Mule ESB vs Oracle SOA Suite comparison

The compared Salesforce and Oracle solutions aren't in the same category. Salesforce is ranked #2 in E , with an average rating of 7.9, and holds a 25.5% mindshare in the category. Oracle is ranked #8 in AIS , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Mule ESB

Read 49 Mule ESB reviews

4,739 Views
3,944 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Oracle SOA Suite

Read 65 Oracle SOA Suite reviews

1,357 Views
880 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Mule ESB

Oracle SOA Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and Oracle SOA Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Salesforce, Red Hat and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB).

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,791 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mule ESB

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (2nd)

Oracle SOA Suite

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (8th), SOA Governance (1st)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. Mule ESB is designed for Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) and holds a mindshare of 25.5%, up 24.9% compared to last year.
Oracle SOA Suite, on the other hand, focuses on Application Infrastructure, holds 4.1% mindshare, down 4.7% since last year.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

PurbayanSaha

Technology Consultant at Ernst & Young

Has API-led architecture and provides a unique, user-friendly, and scalable architecture for hosting APIs

There's room for improvement in multi-file transfer functionality. It's not convenient when using MuleSoft, and it should have better capability for handling large amounts of data. For example, applications like GoAnywhere can handle huge chunks of data, so the tool should also have something to facilitate that aspect of integration.

Read full review

MANOHAR SADDALA

IT Specialist at Eagle Hills

Enables seamless integration with multiple systems

I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten. It's not much more dynamic, not as dynamic as you may think, like seeing it in the cloud. In order to use it, you need to have the download servers and then scale up your systems. Oracle SOA Suites serves as a middle layer between applications. For example, let's say you have SAP, and we have Salesforce or Oracle ERP system. Users connect to those systems and perform certain activities or transactions on the applications. Now, if any data needs to be synchronized or any integration needs to happen between these applications, we use the Oracle SOA Suite. It acts as the bridge between the applications, not between the users. It's like having endpoints between the applications. Currently, we have 20 endpoints; 20 systems are connected to it, which is great. Oracle SOA Suite is being used daily. We are using it to its maximum potential.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The transformation and the data format are the features that I like the most."

"The most valuable feature is that it's programmer-friendly, so it's very easy to develop APIs."

"The connectivity the solution provides is excellent. There are often too many systems that we have to integrate and this helps with that."

"The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot."

"Once it is started, we don't see any problems on a day to day basis."

"Most of our use cases are for Salesforce. So, the connectors for Salesforce have been really helpful. They've made development two times faster."

"The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave."

"The most powerful feature is DataWeave, which is a powerful language where data can be transformed from one form into another."

More Mule ESB pros

"We were able to scale out using multiple application and web servers balanced by hardware load balancers and Weblogic clustering."

"The Oracle SOA Suite has many useful features, and different organizations may place different emphases on the importance of each feature. Certain features are particularly important to the organization, such as the ability to access databases and transform messages, as well as the use of proxy services to secure web services with usernames and passwords. These features can be critical for enabling effective integration and data exchange between systems and applications."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the option to design, and the development can happen at the same time."

"The product provides transparency in finances."

"The stability of the solution is the most valuable feature."

"It performs better in real-time transactions."

"In case there is something that doesn't work out of the box, you have the flexibility to customize it."

"The most valuable feature of the facility, as the partner link, is to try to use third-party services and logic in your own vehicle to orchestrate the information."

More Oracle SOA Suite pros

Cons

"Lacking some connectors that could be included."

"We would like the ability to use our own code. This would allow us to develop customizations with ease. Additionally, it would be nice to have more analytics or insights on the exchanged information between databases."

"There are limitations with the subscription model that comes with the product."

"The solution isn't as stable as we'd like it to be. There are some ongoing issues and therefore Mule has to provide frequent patches. Mule's core IP should be more stable overall."

"It should have some amount of logging."

"It would be beneficial if users could navigate the UI easily without extensive training or learning curves."

"Limitation on external subscribers to listen to the messages on the bus."

"In order to meet the new trend of active metadata management, we need intelligent APIs that can retrieve new data designs and trigger actions over new findings without human intervention."

More Mule ESB cons

"The installation and adjustment process seems too complex."

"Various parts of SOA, BPEL, and so on, each have their own consoles which need to be accessed individually with different logins. It would be better from an admin perspective if all the consoles were accessible via a single login."

"The deployment could be made easier by including add-ons like Hudson and Maven."

"One area that could be better is the human task feature. It could be improved to provide more functionality and customization options because it has limited options available."

"The interface is too complicated. Making modifications still requires too much technical knowledge."

"Other solutions might be better componets such as Salesforce."

"SOA, OSB, SOA Cloud Service."

"The Maven integration in JDeveloper is very basic and might be enhanced to allow the proper use of Maven."

More Oracle SOA Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Mule ESB is an expensive solution."

"I think the price is very high. If you use TIBCO BW, the license is for the CPU usage, then the IPS, and support. I also think the license for the product is a one-time expense."

"Mule ESB is a costly solution. We pay approximately $80,000 annually for the system. The cost of the number of instances, annual subscription, and cloud hosting services are expensive."

"Plan your licensing model (cloud or on-premises or hybrid) that will allow seamless integration with new partners."

"This product is expensive, but it does offer value for money."

"The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."

"Most of the challenges that I had with this solution were for smaller customers. There is not a good licensing model or pricing model. It is more expensive than other solutions, and that's the downside of MuleSoft. I had to be creative to be able to sell it to the business, but we did. This is something they have to work on because for large companies, it's affordable, but for small and medium businesses, it's very hard to sell."

"The pricing must be improved."

More Mule ESB pricing and cost advice

"Oracle pricing is expensive. Support is based on your license. AWS is much better than Oracle in this regard."

"The pricing is not very high as compared to its competitors."

"Based on my knowledge, Oracle SOA Suite doesn't have user-based licensing. It has a system-based licensing model, so you pay for whole systems. Oracle SOA Suite is an expensive solution, so it's a four out of ten for me."

"This product is WebLogic based, hence it can be both resource hungry as well as expensive from a licensing point of view."

"It is necessary to evaluate the requirement regarding the platform usage and what the main operation area of the platform will be."

"Oracle SOA Suite is an expensive solution."

"The product is moderately priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,791 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company

I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...

See all answers

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?

Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mule ESB?

The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle SOA Suite?

The solution's XSLT or XSL Transformation feature was very useful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle SOA Suite?

Oracle SOA Suite is an expensive solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle SOA Suite?

The solution’s initial setup is complex and could be improved. A big challenge for Oracle SOA Suite is that you don't get too many technical resources.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB

Compared 31% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs Mule ESB

Compared 12% of the time

webMethods.io vs Mule ESB

Compared 7% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs Mule ESB

Compared 6% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs Mule ESB

Compared 6% of the time

More Mule ESB Competitors

WebLogic Suite vs Oracle SOA Suite

Compared 42% of the time

Apache Web Server vs Oracle SOA Suite

Compared 11% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs Oracle SOA Suite

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle SOA Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mule ESB

January 2025

Download Mule ESB product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle SOA Suite

January 2025

Download Oracle SOA Suite product report

Also Known As

No data available

SOA Suite

Overview

For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.

Salesforce

Oracle SOA Suite is a comprehensive, standards-based software suite to build, deploy and manage integration following the concepts of service-oriented architecture (SOA). The components of the suite benefit from consistent tooling, a single deployment and management model, end-to-end security and unified metadata management. Oracle SOA Suite helps businesses lower costs by allowing maximum re-use of existing IT investments and assets, regardless of the environment (OS, application server, etc.) they run in, or the technology they were built upon. Its easy-to-use, re-use focused, unified application development tooling and end-to-end lifecycle management support further reduces development and maintenance cost and complexity.

For more information on Oracle SOA Suite, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot

7-Eleven, Arcor SAIC, Banca Transilvania, Eaton Corporation, Emdeon, Ferrovial, Griffith University, National Instruments, Pella Corporation, Vodafone Group Plc,

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

January 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Salesforce, Red Hat and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,791 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.