Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle SOA Suite vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle SOA Suite
Ranking in SOA Governance
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (9th)
TIBCO ActiveMatrix
Ranking in SOA Governance
4th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Server (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the SOA Governance category, the mindshare of Oracle SOA Suite is 26.9%, down from 31.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix is 10.3%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
SOA Governance
 

Featured Reviews

Manoj Satpathy - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 7, 2024
Provides good performance and error handling, but its initial setup is complex and could be improved
We use Oracle SOA Suite for application integration in our company. We were using the on-premises version of the product. Since Oracle SOA Suite has its own engine, you can build your integrations, deploy, and use them. We used the Oracle BPEL Process Manager for Orchestration when we had a lot of business logic. Oracle Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) and Oracle VPN come under the Oracle SOA integration platform. Compared to other solutions like SnapLogic, Oracle SOA Suite is not easy to use. Oracle SOA Suite is suitable for customers with a big complex integration process, where performance and infrastructure stability are more important. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Use TIBCO ActiveMatrix?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is not very high as compared to its competitors."
"The product is moderately priced."
"Based on my knowledge, Oracle SOA Suite doesn't have user-based licensing. It has a system-based licensing model, so you pay for whole systems. Oracle SOA Suite is an expensive solution, so it's a four out of ten for me."
"It is necessary to evaluate the requirement regarding the platform usage and what the main operation area of the platform will be."
"Oracle pricing is expensive. Support is based on your license. AWS is much better than Oracle in this regard."
"Oracle SOA Suite is an expensive solution."
"This product is WebLogic based, hence it can be both resource hungry as well as expensive from a licensing point of view."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SOA Governance solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle SOA Suite?
The solution's XSLT or XSL Transformation feature was very useful.
What needs improvement with Oracle SOA Suite?
The solution’s initial setup is complex and could be improved. A big challenge for Oracle SOA Suite is that you don't get too many technical resources.
Which solution do you prefer: TIBCO ActiveMatrix or Camunda?
Here are the reasons many prefer Camunda over TIBCO ActiveMatrix: Camunda is an open-source project that is free to use and modify, saving you money and giving you more flexibility. It has a larg...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

SOA Suite
ActiveMatrix
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

7-Eleven, Arcor SAIC, Banca Transilvania, Eaton Corporation, Emdeon, Ferrovial, Griffith University, National Instruments, Pella Corporation, Vodafone Group Plc,
Vodafone Hutchison Australia (VHA)
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, SAP, Aurea and others in SOA Governance. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.