Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

EfficientIP DNS Firewall vs Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense comparison

EfficientIP and Infoblox are both solutions in the Domain Name System (DNS) Security category. EfficientIP is ranked #15, while Infoblox is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.0. EfficientIP holds a 1.6% mindshare in DS, compared to Infoblox’s 6.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of EfficientIP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Infoblox users who would recommend it.
EfficientIP DNS Firewall
Read 1 EfficientIP DNS Firewall review
  • 276 Views
  • 215 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Infoblox BloxOne Threat Def...
Read 15 Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense reviews
  • 1,781 Views
  • 838 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between EfficientIP DNS Firewall and Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Infoblox, Palo Alto Networks and others in Domain Name System (DNS) Security.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Domain Name System (DNS) Security Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Domain Name System (DNS) Security
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

EfficientIP DNS Firewall
Ranking in Domain Name System (DNS) Security
15th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Infoblox BloxOne Threat Def...
Ranking in Domain Name System (DNS) Security
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Domain Name System (DNS) Security category, the mindshare of EfficientIP DNS Firewall is 1.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense is 6.2%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Domain Name System (DNS) Security
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1080873 - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to set up and use, and has a helpful network device inventory function
The vendor needs to do more to promote this product in certain regions, helping it to gain market share in territories where it is not widely adopted. The problem with this vendor is that they are too focused on revenue and sales numbers. If a partner is not able to generate the revenue that they're expecting, they put them on hold until they can generate interest and traction in their region for the products. It comes down to the management's mindset. They have a good product but they don't have much patience for a territory that is slow to adopt.
Read full review
Igor Van Den Ouden - PeerSpot reviewer
A hybrid solution for DNS security with insights and security reports
The most valuable feature is policy redirecting and security reports. It detects threats and blocks them. Also, it offers DNS handling and data extraction. It provides a centralized view of connected users and incoming data sources. It is integrated via the API to different monitoring systems that send out alerts. We haven't had any false positives due to this solution.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This product has an inventory function to help maintain a list of the equipment, which is quite good."
"Using the reporting, we can tell that we have gained an extra layer of protection. Just by looking at it, we can see what is being blocked before it even makes it to the firewall. It is definitely working."
"When it comes to helping to detect DNS threats, BloxOne is good on all fronts. The number of false positives is very low, close to none. More than once it has detected new names or lookalike names and protected us and saved us from bad characters."
"The reporting ability is helpful. It allows us to control what our users are able to resolve, and then be able to see reports on that."
"The automatic blocklists are most valuable. A box can maintain several lists from which we can choose if we need to block more or less. We don't have to manually manage the lists ourselves. They're automatically updated."
"BloxOne provides automatic sharing of network context data, which affects our speed of threat response and provide real-time threat intelligence. Our security operations needs this to do their work. It makes us feel safer."
"Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense furthers the existing security posture rather than replacing or trying to replace any existing products."
"The most valuable feature is blocklisting. It's good at what I like to describe as the "silly side cases." We have this annoying security architecture that says we must do this, that, and the other, so we try to make it easier on ourselves."
"Infoblox has helped us improve in the way that we look at data as it comes in and out. We monitor and manage queries from every device that sits inside our company, e.g., every user, every laptop, and every query. When you type something into the web, Infoblox will scan or manage that. If it is going somewhere bad, then it will block them. From a metrics perspective, it gives us data, letting us go back and find those impacted or infected clients to either clean their devices or remove them from the network."
More Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense pros
 

Cons

"The vendor needs to do more to promote this product in certain regions, helping it to gain market share in territories where it is not widely adopted."
"Within the past two years, we discovered certain bugs in their products. The resolution of these bugs took a little too much time, especially if our production environment is down for a certain amount of time, then we are losing money. That is hard to convey to Infoblox support, e.g., we actually need the system up and running again within two or three hours. The awareness of these so-called production down incidents is not really easy to convey."
"They could work on the UI of their website and make their website more user-friendly."
"The initial setup is not a simple "click-click-next" installation. It requires some level of experience ."
"The integration of threat intelligence with other solutions is challenging. If I want to expose threat intelligence, I cannot do it via taxi services. I have to call the API, but the customers are not into creating the APIs. The integration of embedded threat intelligence with other platforms should be better. Infoblox should work on this, and it should be easier for the end user to integrate it. It is very easy to deploy this solution. We should be able to integrate it with other platforms, such as the Next-Generation Firewall, with the same ease."
"The onboarding is a little rough at times, and you need to have some information at hand. It is pretty good, but it would be useful to have a few good examples to set up things like data exfiltration."
"The research side and the reporting side need improvement. Both of those are items on the menu. They could use a little bit of cleanup to make their respective information more easily understood."
"The setup was horrible. About a year ago, Infoblox made us re-enroll all our on-prem DNS servers by a set date to a specific version, or it would stop working. I told my colleague, "Oh, here, we have to upgrade the servers and reconnect them to the CSP." That did not go well at all."
"The product could be cheaper."
More Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this product is very reasonable, especially considering that a company's reputation is priceless."
"There is a significant charge for this product but I think that it's worth it when we look at what it's able to prevent."
"The licensing is set up such that you pay for the number of active users that you're defending at the moment."
"When you buy the subscription, there are no additional costs to add any additional buttons."
"It is a very expensive system. You need to go over the licensing before purchase to make sure you're getting what is needed, not anything extra."
"It's a pricey solution because it's for the advanced kind of customer."
"If you only wanted the DNS filtering and none of the other products built into Threat Defense, it would be nicer if they could do that a la carte since we are not really using a lot of the solution."
"Infoblox BloxOne offers pretty good documentation. Check its documentation, then do a PoC. Infoblox is very good at providing PoCs."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Domain Name System (DNS) Security solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
21%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about EfficientIP DNS Firewall?
EfficientIP DNS Firewall is the hero of my network infrastructure. It provides reliable protection against DNS-based cyber threats, ensuring that my systems remain safe from malicious activities. I...
See all answers
What do you like most about Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense?
The most valuable feature is policy redirecting and security reports.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense?
The product is expensive depending on all features. I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense?
The product could be cheaper.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

BlueCat Edge vs EfficientIP DNS Firewall Logo
BlueCat Edge vs EfficientIP DNS Firewall
Compared 67% of the time
Palo Alto Networks DNS Security vs EfficientIP DNS Firewall Logo
Palo Alto Networks DNS Security vs EfficientIP DNS Firewall
Compared 33% of the time
More EfficientIP DNS Firewall Competitors
Cisco Umbrella vs Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense Logo
Cisco Umbrella vs Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense
Compared 37% of the time
Palo Alto Networks DNS Security vs Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense Logo
Palo Alto Networks DNS Security vs Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense
Compared 19% of the time
Zscaler Internet Access vs Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense Logo
Zscaler Internet Access vs Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense
Compared 18% of the time
Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection vs Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense Logo
Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection vs Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense
Compared 10% of the time
EfficientIP DNS Guardian vs Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense Logo
EfficientIP DNS Guardian vs Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense
Compared 7% of the time
More Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Domain Name System (DNS) Security
December 2024
EfficientIP DNS Firewall reportDownload EfficientIP DNS Firewall product report
Buyer's Guide
Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense
December 2024
Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense reportDownload Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
BloxOne Threat Defense, Infoblox ActiveTrust, Infoblox ActiveTrust Cloud
 

Learn More

EfficientIP
Infoblox
 

Overview

DNS Firewall prevents connected devices from becoming infected with malware and blocks their activity by enabling recursive DNS servers to stop or redirect queries from clients that want to access identified malicious domains and/or IPs.

Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense strengthens and optimizes your security posture from the foundation up, giving you the visibility, control and automation to secure the hybrid workplace. Operating at the DNS level, BloxOne Threat Defense uncovers threats that other solutions do not and stops attacks earlier in the threat lifecycle. Through pervasive automation and ecosystem integration, it drives efficiencies in SecOps, increases the effectiveness of the existing security stack, secures digital and work-from-anywhere efforts and lowers the total cost for cybersecurity.

 

Sample Customers

De Montfort University, STMicroelectronics, Leeds Beckett University
Council Rock School District, EagleView, Schneider Electric, Baptist Memorial Health Care, American University
Buyer's Guide
Domain Name System (DNS) Security
December 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Infoblox, Palo Alto Networks and others in Domain Name System (DNS) Security. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Domain Name System (DNS) Security vendors.

We monitor all Domain Name System (DNS) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.