No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Elastic Search vs Weka comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Search
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
92
Ranking in other categories
Indexing and Search (1st), Cloud Data Integration (5th), Search as a Service (1st), Vector Databases (3rd)
Weka
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Data Mining (4th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

Elastic Search and Weka aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Elastic Search is designed for Indexing and Search and holds a mindshare of 11.3%, down 25.8% compared to last year.
Weka, on the other hand, focuses on Data Mining, holds 8.0% mindshare, down 20.3% since last year.
Indexing and Search Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Elastic Search11.3%
OpenText Knowledge Discovery (IDOL)6.0%
Lucidworks6.0%
Other76.7%
Indexing and Search
Data Mining Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Weka8.0%
IBM SPSS Modeler17.4%
IBM SPSS Statistics17.2%
Other57.400000000000006%
Data Mining
 

Featured Reviews

Anurag Pal - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Lead at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Search and aggregations have transformed how I manage and visualize complex real estate data
Elastic Search consumes lots of memory. You have to provide the heap size a lot if you want the best out of it. The major problem is when a company wants to use Elastic Search but it is at a startup stage. At a startup stage, there is a lot of funds to consider. However, their use case is that they have to use a pretty significant amount of data. For that, it is very expensive. For example, if you take OLTP-based databases in the current scenario, such as ClickHouse or Iceberg, you can do it on 4GB RAM also. Elastic Search is for analytical records. You have to do the analytics on it. According to me, as far as I have seen, people will start moving from Elastic Search sooner or later. Why? Because it is expensive. Another thing is that there is an open source available for that, such as ClickHouse. Around 2014 and 2012, there was only one competitor at that time, which was Solr. But now, not only is Solr there, but you can take ClickHouse and you have Iceberg also. How are we going to compete with them? There is also a fork of Elastic Search that is OpenSearch. As far as I have seen in lots of articles I am reading, users are using it as the ELK stack for logs and analyzing logs. That is not the exact use case. It can do more than that if used correctly. But as it involves lots of cost, people are shifting from Elastic Search to other sources. When I am talking about pricing, it is not only the server pricing. It is the amount of memory it is using. The pricing is basically the heap Java, which is taking memory. That is the major problem happening here. If we have to run an MVP, a client comes to me and says, "Anurag, we need to do a proof of concept. Can we do it if I can pay a 4GB or 16GB expense?" How can I suggest to them that a minimum of 16GB is needed for Elastic Search so that your proof of concept will be proved? In that case, what I have to suggest from the beginning is to go with Cassandra or at the initial stage, go with PostgreSQL. The problem is the memory it is taking. That is the only thing.
reviewer1522338 - PeerSpot reviewer
Phd at a educational organization with 51-200 employees
Using data mining and visualization has improved my research and student learning process
In my opinion, Weka is very useful. I think perhaps a new function with a new algorithm in data mining could be developed. The algorithms currently available in Weka are very good, and all functions are very useful. I have found that I need to use Weka with R and different databases, which has been very useful for me. I am satisfied with Weka's visualization tool. Weka is very easy to use, is very complete, and provides many benefits to the end user. It has many algorithms in data mining and many algorithms to prepare data for the next process in data mining. Weka has many graphical interfaces, though it may not have as many tools for analyzing results.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features are the detection and correlation features."
"The fact that you can dump any type of format in the database without any specific reformatting is fantastic."
"The most valuable feature of Elastic Enterprise Search is the opportunity to search behind and between different logs."
"The products comes with REST APIs."
"A positive feature of ELK is that it directly interacts with Elasticsearch, the UI is very nice, and performance wise it's quite good too."
"The most valuable feature is the out of the box Kibana."
"The initial installation and setup were straightforward."
"The best feature of Elastic Search that I appreciate is its monitoring capability."
"If they want their task done faster, and they do not have enough coding expertise, this is definitely an excellent solution to choose from."
"The path of machine learning in classification and clustering is useful. The GUI can get you results. No programming is needed. No need to write down your script first or send to your model or input your data."
"It doesn’t cost anything to use the product."
"In Weka, anyone can access the program without being a programmer, which is a good feature since the entry cost is very low."
"I mainly use this solution for the regression tree, and for its association rules. I run these two methodologies for Weka."
"Weka is very easy to use, is very complete, and provides many benefits to the end user."
"Weka eliminates the need for coding, allowing you to easily set parameters and complete the majority of the machine learning task with just a few clicks."
"I think Weka is definitely a good investment, that is why we still use it."
 

Cons

"It was not possible to use authentication three years back. You needed to buy the product's services for authentication."
"More AI would be beneficial. I would also appreciate more simplicity in dashboards."
"They should improve its documentation. Their official documentation is not very informative."
"I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. We faced a few issues."
"Ratio aggregation is not supported in this solution."
"They could simplify the Filebeat and Logstash configuration piece. There are a lot of manual steps on the operating system."
"Elastic needs to work on their Machine Learning offering because currently they have been trying to make it a black box which doesn't work for a serious user (a Data Scientist) as it doesn't give any control over the underlying algorithm."
"The solution's integration and configuration are not easy. Not many people know exactly what to do."
"While it might offer insights for basic warehouse tasks, it falls short of deeper understanding and results."
"Weka is not horizontally scalable. If I had to run a large dataset over Weka I would have to have a very large usage."
"If you have one missing value in your dataset and this missing value belongs to a specific attribute and the attribute is a numeric attribute and there is only one missing data, whenever you import this data, the problem is that Weka cannot understand that this is a numeric field; it converts everything into a string, and there is no way to convert the string into numerical math."
"Not particularly user friendly."
"Weka could be more stable."
"Weka is a little complicated and not necessarily suited for users who aren't skilled and experienced in data science."
"The visualization of Weka is subpar and could improve. Machine learning and visualization do not work well together. For example, we want to know how we can we delete empty cells or how can we fill in the empty cells without cleaning the data system and putting it together."
"The product is good, but I would like it to work with big data. I know it has a Spark integration they could use to do analysis in clusters, but it's not so clear how to use it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing structure depends on the scalability steps."
"We are paying $1,500 a month to use the solution. If you want to have endpoint protection you need to pay more."
"It can move from $10,000 US Dollars per year to any price based on how powerful you need the searches to be and the capacity in terms of storage and process."
"The premium license is expensive."
"I rate Elastic Search's pricing an eight out of ten."
"It can be expensive."
"The solution is not expensive because users have the option of choosing the managed or the subscription model."
"We are using the free open-sourced version of this solution."
"Currently, I am using an open-source version so I don't know much about the price of this solution."
"The solution is free and open-source."
"As far as I know, Weka is a freeware tool, and I am not aware if they have an online solution or if it is a commercial product."
"We use the free version now. My faculty is very small."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Indexing and Search solutions are best for your needs.
886,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
6%
Educational Organization
16%
University
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business38
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise46
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ELK Elasticsearch?
Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time anal...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ELK Elasticsearch?
On the subject of pricing, Elastic Search is very cost-efficient. You can host it on-premises, which would incur zero cost, or take it as a SaaS-based service, where the expenses remain minimal.
What needs improvement with ELK Elasticsearch?
From the UI point of view, we are using most probably Kibana, and I think they can do much better than that. That is something they can fine-tune a little bit, and then it will definitely be a good...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Search vs. Weka and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
886,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.