Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Search vs Elastic Search comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Search
Ranking in Search as a Service
7th
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Elastic Search
Ranking in Search as a Service
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
Indexing and Search (1st), Cloud Data Integration (11th), Vector Databases (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Search as a Service category, the mindshare of Azure Search is 14.6%, up from 12.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Search is 12.2%, up from 7.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Search as a Service
 

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Heikal - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides efficient documentation features, but its support services need improvement
We use the solution to link the Active Directory account to Office 365 The solution's most valuable features are Word, Excel, and documentation. The solution's stability and support could be better. We have been using the solution for three to four years. I rate the solution's stability a six…
Saurav Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements
Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time analytics with Elastic benefits us due to the huge traffic volume in our organization, which reaches up to 60,000 requests per second. With logs of approximately 25 GB per day, manually analyzing traffic behavior, payloads, headers, user agents, and other details is impractical.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Offers a tremendous amount of flexibility and scalability when integrating with applications."
"The product is pretty resilient."
"The solution's initial setup is straightforward."
"The search functionality time has been reduced to a few milliseconds."
"It provides good access capabilities to various platforms."
"Because all communication is done via the REST API, data is retrieved quickly in JSON format to reduce overhead and latency.​"
"The product is extremely configurable, allowing you to customize the search experience to suit your needs."
"Creates indexers to get data from different data sources."
"The solution is quite scalable and this is one of its advantages."
"I am impressed with the product's Logstash. The tool is fast and customizable. You can build beautiful dashboards with it. It is useful and reliable."
"I have found the sort capability of Elastic very useful for allowing us to find the information we need very quickly."
"The most valuable features are the detection and correlation features."
"The most valuable features are its user-friendly interface and seamless navigation."
"I appreciate that Elastic Enterprise Search is easy to use and that we have people on our team who are able to manage it effectively."
"The most valuable features are the ease and speed of the setup."
"I really like the visualization that you can do within it. That's really handy. Product-wise, it is a very good and stable product."
 

Cons

"For SDKs, Azure Search currently offers solutions for .NET and Python. Additional platforms would be welcomed, especially native iOS and Android solutions for mobile development."
"It would be good if the site found a better way to filter things based on subscription."
"They should add an API for third-party vendors, like a security operating center or reporting system, that would be a big improvement."
"The after-hour services are slow."
"Adding items to Azure Search using its .NET APIs sometimes throws exceptions."
"The pricing is room for improvement."
"The initial setup is not as easy as it should be."
"The solution's stability could be better."
"It should be easier to use. It has been getting better because many functions are pre-defined, but it still needs improvement."
"Kibana should be more friendly, especially when building dashboards."
"Elasticsearch could improve by honoring Unix environmental variables and not relying only on those provided by Java (e.g. installing plugins over the Unix http proxy)."
"Scalability and ROI are the areas they have to improve."
"They should improve its documentation. Their official documentation is not very informative. They can also improve their technical support. They don't help you much with the customized stuff. They also need to add more visuals. Currently, they have line charts, bar charts, and things like that, and they can add more types of visuals. They should also improve the alerts. They are not very simple to use and are a bit complex. They could add more options to the alerting system."
"There is an index issue in which the data starts to crash as it increases."
"I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. We faced a few issues."
"The different applications need to be individually deployed."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the solution's pricing is ok compared to other cloud devices."
"The solution is affordable."
"I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, where one is the low price, and ten is the high price."
"The cost is comparable."
"​When telling people about the product, I always encourage them to set up a new service using the free pricing tier. This allows them to learn about the product and its capabilities in a risk-free environment. Depending on their needs, the free tier may be suitable for their projects, however enterprise applications will most likely required a higher, paid tier."
"For the actual costs, I encourage users to view the pricing page on the Azure site for details.​"
"This is a free, open source software (FOSS) tool, which means no cost on the front-end. There are no free lunches in this world though. Technical skill to implement and support are costly on the back-end with ELK, whether you train/hire internally or go for premium services from Elastic."
"To access all the features available you require both the open source license and the production license."
"The pricing model is questionable and needs to be addressed because when you would like to have the security they charge per machine."
"The premium license is expensive."
"ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs."
"We are using the free version and intend to upgrade."
"The tool is not expensive. Its licensing costs are yearly."
"We use the free version for some logs, but not extensive use."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Search as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Azure Search?
The after-hour services are slow. It could be better.
What is your primary use case for Azure Search?
We use the solution to link the Active Directory account to Office 365.
What do you like most about ELK Elasticsearch?
Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time anal...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ELK Elasticsearch?
I am not directly involved with pricing or setup costs. While I know a portion is open-source, a paid version might be necessary.
What needs improvement with ELK Elasticsearch?
An improvement would be to have an interface that allows easier navigation and tracing of logs. The current system requires manually inputting dates to verify alerts. A visual timeline that pinpoin...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

XOMNI, Real Madrid C.F., Weichert Realtors, JLL, NAV CANADA, Medihoo, autoTrader Corporation, Gjirafa
T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Search vs. Elastic Search and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.