SAS Data Management vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest comparison

erwin by Quest and SAS are both solutions in the Data Governance category. erwin by Quest is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4, while SAS is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.5. erwin by Quest holds a 2.7% mindshare in DG, compared to SAS’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of erwin by Quest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SAS users who would recommend it.

erwin Data Intelligence by ...

Read 18 erwin Data Intelligence by Quest reviews

4,232 Views
1,100 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAS Data Management

Read 16 SAS Data Management reviews

545 Views
452 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

erwin Data Intelligence by ...

SAS Data Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

SAS Data Management and erwin Data Intelligence by Quest are major competitors in the data management and intelligence sector. While SAS excels at data integration and quality, erwin Data Intelligence has a strong edge in metadata management and data literacy due to its comprehensive tooling and impact analysis.

Features: SAS Data Management offers robust data quality and integration solutions, a user-friendly interface for non-technical users, and powerful automation scripts. Users appreciate its ability to sort and categorize data efficiently and its extensive access to various data sources. Erwin Data Intelligence is recognized for its centralized source of data truth, comprehensive data lineage capabilities, and Smart Data Connectors. Its strong metadata management, business glossary, and visual dashboards enhance data literacy across organizations and streamline management tasks.

Room for Improvement:SAS Data Management could improve in areas like high costs, limited use cases outside ETL, and unfriendly licensing models. Challenges with third-party database connectivity and complex installation also require attention. Erwin Data Intelligence could benefit from better module integration, consistent APIs, and enhanced data cataloging. The complexity of its UI and limited support for handling large datasets or unstructured databases are noted as challenges. Both products need better analytics and machine learning integrations to stay competitive.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:SAS Data Management is primarily on-premises, with mixed customer service experiences post-acquisition, reflecting issues in expert availability. Erwin provides a versatile deployment across cloud and on-premises environments and is praised for its consistent, responsive customer service, with strong collaboration during problem-solving.

Pricing and ROI:SAS Data Management presents a high-cost option, challenging for smaller businesses despite significant ROI within the pharmaceutical sector. Erwin Data Intelligence is viewed as more cost-effective for larger enterprises with strategic pricing that aligns with its robust features, offering a positive long-term ROI for data governance and management.

To learn more, read our detailed SAS Data Management vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

SAS Data Management vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

erwin Data Intelligence by ...

Ranking in Data Governance

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAS Data Management

Ranking in Data Governance

26th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (37th), Data Quality (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of erwin Data Intelligence by Quest is 2.7%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Data Management is 0.7%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Roy Pollack

Advisor Application Architect at CPS Energy

The solution provides more profound insights into legacy data movements, lineages, and definitions in the short term.

We have loaded over 300,000 attributes and more than 1000 mappings. The performance is slow, depending on the lineage or search. This is supposed to be fixed in the later versions, but we haven't upgraded yet. The integration with various metadata sources, including erwin Data Modeler, isn't smooth in the current version. It took some experimentation to get things working. We hope this is improved in the newer version. The initial version we used felt awkward because Erwin implemented features from other companies into their offering.

Read full review

Vivek Trivedi

Head finance transformation at Ahli United Bank Ksc

Has robust data governance capabilities and efficient financial alerting features

The platform's robust data governance capabilities ensure strong compliance with regulatory standards. Our dedicated data governance team is responsible for setting policies and monitoring data access and usage. Additionally, we have a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and an independent InfoSec team that work together to enforce these policies. This multi-layered approach ensures that data governance is effectively managed and compliant with all necessary regulations. It is integrated with SQL and Power BI servers for executive management dashboard reporting. This integration supports comprehensive data analysis and reporting needs, which was a key factor in our decision. The value of using vCenter lies in its comprehensive data infrastructure management. It significantly enhances our reporting, day-to-day decision-making, and analytics capabilities. Integrating SaaS with vCenter adds value by streamlining key functions and improving overall organizational efficiency. The solution can be considered expensive, particularly due to infrastructure, maintenance, and ownership costs. The long-term savings and efficiencies gained from using vCenter can justify the investment for large organizations. However, the high costs might not be justifiable for smaller organizations with less data and fewer resources. Conducting a thorough cost-benefit analysis based on the organization's specific needs and scale is recommended. I rate it an eight.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a central place for everybody to start any ETL data pipeline builds. This tool is being heavily used, plus it's heavily integrated with all the ETL data pipeline design and build processes. Nobody can bypass these processes and do something without going through this tool."

"We always know where our data is, and anybody can look that up, whether they're a business person who doesn't know anything about Informatica, or a developer who knows everything about creating data movement jobs in Informatica, but who does not understand the business terminology or the data that is being used in the tool."

"Being able to capture different business metrics and organize them in different catalogs is most valuable. We can organize these metrics into sales-related metrics, customer-related metrics, supply chain-related metrics, etc."

"Data Intelligence allows us to automate multiple tasks we had previously done manually, such as restructuring the metadata for our purposes, setting up ETL flows, and defining the data tables we create. It also enables us to standardize our approach and our technical processes."

"The solution gives us data lineage which means we can see an impact if we make a change. The ability for us to have that in this company is brilliant because we used to have 49 data stewards from some 23 different groups within six major departments. Each one of those was a silo unto itself. The ability to have different glossaries — but all pointed to the same key terms, key concepts, or key attributes — has made life really simple."

"The solution saves time in data discovery and understanding our entire organization's data."

"The data mapping manager is the most valuable feature."

"They have just the most marvelous reports called mind maps, where whatever you are focused on sits in the middle. They have this wonderful graphic spiderweb that spreads out from there where you can see this thing mapped to other logical bits or physical bits and who's the steward of it. It's very cool and available to your business teams through a portal."

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest pros

"The solution is very stable. We haven't faced any issues with glitches or bugs. We haven't had any crashes."

"This is an established product with powerful data analysis and varied options for user entry points."

"I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize."

"The platform's robust data governance capabilities ensure strong compliance with regulatory standards."

"In terms of which features I have found most valuable, I would say the importing and exporting features. Additionally, the data sorting, categorizing and summarizing features, especially how it can summarize based on categories. These are the key features."

"The tool is reliable, quick, and powerful."

"The technical support is excellent."

"Its robustness is valuable. It is a full-fledged suite. We have a data warehouse model, and there are also a lot of data quality management tools. The repository and all other tools are there. So, it is a full package in terms of reporting tools."

More SAS Data Management pros

Cons

"The metadata ingestion is very nice because of the ability to automate it. It would be nice to be able to do this ingestion, or set it up, from one place, instead of having to set it up separately for every data asset that is ingested."

"The solution's Arabic language processing is limited. The results are limited when you use the interface in Arabic."

"The fact that I sometimes have to go in and out of different applications, even though it's all part of the whole erwin suite, perhaps means it could be architected a little bit better. I think they do have some ideas for improvements there."

"The integration with various metadata sources, including erwin Data Modeler, isn't smooth in the current version. It took some experimentation to get things working. We hope this is improved in the newer version. The initial version we used felt awkward because Erwin implemented features from other companies into their offering."

"Really huge datasets, where the logical names or the lexicons weren't groomed or maintained well, were the only area where it really had room for improvement. A huge data set would cause erwin to crash. If there were half a million or 1 million tables, erwin would hang."

"The versioning can sometimes be confusing because we use the publishing feature for the mapping. Technical analysts sometimes have two versions, and they should know that the public version is the correct one."

"There may be some opportunities for improvement in terms of the user interface to make it a little bit more intuitive. They have made some good progress. Originally, when we started, we were on version 9 or 10. Over the last couple of releases, I've seen some improvements that they have made, but there might be a few other additional areas in UI where they can make some enhancements."

"One big improvement we would like to see would be the workflow integration of codeset mapping with the erwin source to target mapping. That's a bit clunky for us. The two often seem to be in conflict with one another. Codeset mappings that are used within the source to target mappings are difficult to manage because they get locked."

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest cons

"I would like the tool to include the ability to automate the modifications of the integrations."

"Very little needs to improve but perhaps a nicer graphic interface and remaining competetive in the growing field of data analytics."

"One problem is accessing the data using a solution other than SAS. The SAS data, which we create in the SAS, cannot be accessed by other tools. We can't open those data in other applications. So we need to have that application in place."

"The solution could use better documentation."

"Integration and cloud migration are areas where we see potential for improvement."

"We find we often have to go back and re-train users when there are changes made to the solution because the changes are not intuitive."

"The pricing of the solution needs to be improved. They need to work to make it more affordable."

"With SAS Data Management, you have to purchase an external driver, configure all of the tables for all of the data that you will extract from Salesforce. It's not a straightforward process."

More SAS Data Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is too high."

"There is an additional fee for the server maintenance."

"erwin was at a good price. The federal government wouldn't buy something if the pricing wasn't good."

"You buy a seat license for your portal. We have 100 seats for the portal, then you buy just the development licenses for the people who are going to put the data in."

"We operate on a yearly subscription and because it is an enterprise license we only have one. It is not dependent on the number of users."

"The price is reasonable and competitive. When you get into forward and reverse-engineering, the cost could go up. However, if you are a large organization, you would probably be able to access different packages. If, however, you don't need forward and reverse-engineering, then the price is relatively cheap."

"erwin's pricing was cheaper than its competitors."

"erwin is cheaper than other solutions and this should appeal to other buyers. It has a good price tag."

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest pricing and cost advice

"While it is even free for personal use on the cloud, it can be expensive for desktop installations and enterprise use."

"The solution is expensive."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"The licensing model for vCenter is a perpetual license with yearly payments."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Non Profit

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

13%

Insurance Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The data mapping manager is the most valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The price is reasonable, and a subscription is required.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The data quality assessment requires third-party components and a separate license. I would like to have better integration around the data quality. I would appreciate the inclusion of a non-struct...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAS Data Management?

I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Data Management?

The licensing model for vCenter is a perpetual license with yearly payments. This model ensures continuous updates and support while managing initial setup costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAS Data Management?

Integration and cloud migration are areas where we see potential for improvement. A more seamless integration process and transitioning to a cloud-based environment would enhance user-friendliness ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 37% of the time

Collibra Governance vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 18% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 10% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 9% of the time

Collibra Lineage vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 7% of the time

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest Competitors

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Data Management

Compared 18% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAS Data Management

Compared 13% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs SAS Data Management

Compared 13% of the time

Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs SAS Data Management

Compared 11% of the time

SSIS vs SAS Data Management

Compared 9% of the time

More SAS Data Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

December 2024

Download erwin Data Intelligence by Quest product report

Buyer's Guide

SAS Data Management

November 2024

Download SAS Data Management product report

Also Known As

erwin DG, erwin Data Governance

SAS Data Management Platform, Data Management Platform, DataFlux

Learn More

erwin by Quest

SAS

Overview

The erwin Data Intelligence Suite (erwin DI) combines data catalog and data literacy capabilities for greater awareness of and access to available data assets, guidance on their use, and guardrails to ensure data policies and best practices are followed. Automatically harvest, transform and feed metadata from a wide array of data sources, operational processes, business applications and data models into a central data catalog. Then make it accessible and understandable within context via role-based views. This complete metadata-driven approach to data governance facilitates greater IT and business collaboration.

Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.

Sample Customers

Oracle, Infosys, GSK, Toyota Motor Sales, HSBC

Data Management, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Absa, Aegon, Allianz Global Corporate & SpecialtyAusgrid, Bank of Queensland, Bell, BMC Software, Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force, Stockholm County Council, Telus, The Travel Corporation, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance

Buyer's Guide

SAS Data Management vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

December 2024

Free Report: SAS Data Management vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Find out what your peers are saying about SAS Data Management vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAS Data Management vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.