Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.4
erwin Data Intelligence enhances data accuracy, cuts costs, and boosts productivity, yielding significant ROI through efficiency and time savings.
Sentiment score
7.8
Microsoft Purview Data Governance enhances data management, reduces risks, and boosts reputations, offering long-term advantages across industries.
Clients benefit from using a one-stop-shop solution, increasing their visibility across different platforms.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.6
erwin Data Intelligence by Quest offers responsive and knowledgeable support with varying resolution times and generally high customer satisfaction.
Sentiment score
5.8
Microsoft Purview support varies; quick and knowledgeable or delayed and less informed, rating six to ten overall.
They're skillful people who know what they're doing in their space.
Overall, it doesn't meet our expectations.
The support could be better, particularly with consulting.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Erwin Data Intelligence is scalable for various user needs, despite lacking advanced cloud tools, with effective metadata handling.
Sentiment score
7.8
Microsoft Purview offers scalable data management, seamlessly integrates with Azure, handles numerous sources efficiently, but may incur high costs.
With automation, you can label five documents or 50,000 with the same amount of clicks.
The product is scalable and works across multi-cloud and multi-platform environments.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Erwin Data Intelligence by Quest is stable and reliable, with minor issues resolved quickly, ensuring continued user confidence.
Sentiment score
7.4
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is stable with minimal issues, requires careful patch management, and supports a 99.9% SLA.
It can take seven days to 24 hours to determine whether a policy is effective.
 

Room For Improvement

Erwin Data Intelligence needs enhanced API consistency, UI simplicity, better large dataset handling, and improved AI, support, and integration features.
Microsoft Purview needs improved integration, functionality, and support in data lineage, API, compliance, notifications, and third-party connections.
Auto-tagging should be available at lower levels of licensing.
A watermark feature or similar tools to help enhance security for end users could be added.
It's essential to know if a feature isn't working due to missing licenses.
 

Setup Cost

erwin Data Intelligence offers competitive pricing with user and module licenses, potential discounts, and automation for cost efficiency.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is cost-effective with flexible pricing but may require additional licenses for certain features.
The feature might be available in the console, but it won't work without the proper license, creating confusion.
The experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing was smooth, as most Purview functionalities were included in the e5 licenses we migrated to for other reasons.
 

Valuable Features

Erwin Data Intelligence enhances data governance with automation, metadata management, visualization, and seamless integration for efficient data handling.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance enhances data protection, classification, and compliance across multi-cloud environments with intuitive tools and automation features.
The sensitivity labeling is the most valuable feature because it is the foundation for automating the encryption process and ensuring proper data handling across the organization.
It provides a comprehensive view of the entire ecosystem's threats and compliance in real time.
Purview's ability to connect to iOS, Mac, and Android devices is critical.
 

Categories and Ranking

erwin Data Intelligence by ...
Ranking in Data Governance
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Purview Data Gove...
Ranking in Data Governance
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
Microsoft Security Suite (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of erwin Data Intelligence by Quest is 2.6%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Governance is 27.8%, down from 28.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Governance
 

Featured Reviews

Roy Pollack - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution provides more profound insights into legacy data movements, lineages, and definitions in the short term.
We have loaded over 300,000 attributes and more than 1000 mappings. The performance is slow, depending on the lineage or search. This is supposed to be fixed in the later versions, but we haven't upgraded yet. The integration with various metadata sources, including erwin Data Modeler, isn't smooth in the current version. It took some experimentation to get things working. We hope this is improved in the newer version. The initial version we used felt awkward because Erwin implemented features from other companies into their offering.
James McDowall - PeerSpot reviewer
The sensitivity and retention options in Purview are excellent
Some of the menu headings may not be easy to understand for some people. For example, when I first used Purview, I noticed that one of the self-compliance centers had changed its name. Microsoft has done a huge amount of updates, and sometimes it's hard to keep track of what Purview can do. We almost constantly have to explore it. Maybe Microsoft could have a 365 roadmap where we can look at upcoming features, or some kind of bulletin announcement for Purview users that explains new features and what they can do in simple terms. We could also look at the menu settings. In my experience of using Purview, we've never used it as an exclusive system for IT professionals or technical staff. We were very keen that other specialists around the business made use of some of these features because we thought that some of what Purview could do was relevant to other departments as well as IT. For example, we have HR managers and financial staff who use it. I think that some of the terminology in Purview is pitched toward IT and tech professionals, and it may not be immediately understood by other specialists. This is something that could be improved.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
9%
Insurance Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?
The data mapping manager is the most valuable feature.
What needs improvement with erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?
The data quality assessment requires third-party components and a separate license. I would like to have better integration around the data quality. I would appreciate the inclusion of a non-struct...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?
It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?
The auto-tagging feature should be available at a lower licensing level.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?
Auto-tagging should be available at lower levels of licensing. Right now, a high level of licensing is needed for auto-tagging, and this feature should be made available at a lower license level.
 

Also Known As

erwin DG, erwin Data Governance
Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oracle, Infosys, GSK, Toyota Motor Sales, HSBC
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.