ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG comparison

ExtraHop Networks and NetAlly are both solutions in the Network Diagnostics category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #11, while NetAlly is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0. ExtraHop Networks holds a 0.9% mindshare in ND, compared to NetAlly’s 7.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetAlly users who would recommend it.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Read 8 ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reviews

15 Views
9 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Read 23 NetAlly EtherScope nXG reviews

166 Views
49 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2024

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations and NetAlly EtherScope nXG compete in the IT and Network Management category. NetAlly EtherScope nXG seems to have the upper hand due to its feature-rich offering despite pricing considerations.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) offers extensive network monitoring, advanced threat detection, and detailed analytics. NetAlly EtherScope nXG provides comprehensive network testing tools, portability, and ease of use in varied environments.

Room for Improvement: ExtraHop Reveal(x) needs more intuitive configurations, enhanced reporting capabilities, and better integration with existing systems. NetAlly EtherScope nXG requires improved battery life, better integration with other network tools, and more user-friendly interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop Reveal(x) is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. NetAlly EtherScope nXG also has an easy setup but a steeper learning curve, with both products receiving positive service reviews.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop Reveal(x) offers good value for money with reasonable setup costs and favorable ROI. NetAlly EtherScope nXG, though perceived as more expensive, is considered worth the investment due to its extensive features and reliable performance.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Ranking in Network Diagnostics

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (70th), IT Operations Analytics (15th), Network Packet Capture (7th)

NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Ranking in Network Diagnostics

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Troubleshooting (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Diagnostics category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.9%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetAlly EtherScope nXG is 7.6%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Diagnostics

Featured Reviews

Out West

Project Manager and IT Management Consultant at a integrator with 1,001-5,000 employees

Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations

We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.

Read full review

Doug Dickerson

Manager at Northwestern

Handheld form factor, intuitive interface that is easy to use, helps us quickly troubleshoot network problems

It would be helpful if this product interfaced with AirWave. The battery life should be improved. The real negative to the product is the horrible battery life. We had hoped for it to be able to deliver configurations to our network switches, and I think they're developing something for that. However, it doesn't do that now. We were hoping that we would, as we replace or refresh network components, be able to use this tool to push a config file to the switch. For example, the Aruba switches that we're deploying come with a Bluetooth function where we can push configs from our phones. It would be much more convenient to use this device, rather than using our personal cell phones to do it. I think that the capability is there, but it just hasn't been figured out yet.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are many valuable features in this product, but probably the biggest is the customization capability it has."

"Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."

"Wire data analytics."

"The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network."

"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."

"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space."

"The whole product is valuable because it's really a bunch of features that make up the one testing utility. Between auto tests, wireless assessments, its ability to do iPerf speed and traffic testing, as well as packet captures — all of those really contribute to a very successful product and allow me to do my job in a better manner."

"One of the key measurements that we use out of the device is the channel utilization measurement, how much traffic is on the air in a given channel. That's the most valuable feature for us. The ability to make a very fast measurement of how much traffic is on the air is a key value. Otherwise we'd have to do a packet capture and do some analysis. It speeds up our testing."

"I like EtherScope's WiFi scanning, heat map, and load testing. It's an excellent tool that sets you straight, so you don't need to beat around the bush or wait for other people. It's easy to share the reports with other people."

"It cuts the time down in half. You don't need to get a laptop out and do different testing. We can just grab this one tool, bring it, and do all our network testing, surveying, and reviews to figure out what the problems are with just one device, instead of having to use multiple people and devices to do that. You cut down time by 50% because you won't normally need multiple people onsite. A lot of times, you can do everything with one person and one tool."

"When it comes to that remote troubleshooting perspective of being able to survey an area to see if there are problems, make adjustments, and then have that same individual resurvey that same area, I don't have to send people to a week long class on how to use the device. I know I am getting consistent results, which can verify near real-time, and whether or not the changes that I have implemented solve the problem."

"My impression of the ease of use is that it definitely is easy to use both the handheld device and the app walking around."

"The most valuable features are the WiFi troubleshooting, network validation, and cabling validation, and the fact that it's an all-in-one tool. You don't have to carry different tools. The multi-technology functionality and its ability to do WiFi and wired Ethernet analysis in one device are the best aspects."

"Among those features that are important are the AutoTest to create a profile and then see that the network connection is in line with that profile. Also, the LANBERT test to have an idea about the quality of the cable. It is often the case that you have no reports on the cable infrastructure, so this test is also very valuable for us."

More NetAlly EtherScope nXG pros

Cons

"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."

"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."

"Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."

"They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."

"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."

"We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services."

"AirMapper is very quick and easy once everything is on there, but I would like to see an improvement on how you get things on there. Currently, rather than being able to build up buildings or a site of things, every map is an individual piece. We should be able to set up an AirMapper survey easily and more effectively. At the moment, we just have separate floor plans. It'd be great to be able to build a building and tell where different floors are so that if it hears an AP on the floor below, it doesn't put two APs, one on that floor and one on the other floor, and it knows that there are two floors here. One is on top of the other, and it won't put the AP at both places. It would put it on one of the floors where it would be strongest. This would be one of the biggest improvements."

"NetAlly EtherScope nXG's reporting and table qualification could be improved."

"There is room for improvement in the battery life and price."

"I would love to see port profiles. This is something I've expressed to them. The ability for a technician to plug it into a switch port, and say, "Okay, this port will be an access point or this port will be a phone and desktop PC," thus choosing a profile. It will then push a configuration to the device it's connected to and verify that the switch port is correctly configured, so I can hand this to a phone tech who doesn't have any access to a network switch to be able to make changes. They can go out and plug this into a port, then they are able to push a profile to the switch port through the device. That would be pretty fantastic as a next step for this device."

"The only issue that I have ever had is the battery life. It does drain a little bit quickly... While it's true that by the time I'm finished with my assessment it's usually dead, I have usually finished what I need to do and everything has been pushed to Link-Live. But occasionally, I might need a backup battery if I need to do something for multiple hours."

"The reporting could be better, with more accurate measurements of loss over cables, impedance, etc. The mapping also needs to be improved. You should be able to do free formatting of the topology."

"I use the NetAlly site and one of the things I don't like about the topology map, something I wish I could fix, is that the map kind of jiggles if you don't adjust any of the settings."

"NetAlly doesn't have a spectrum analyzer. I have to use other tools to view the spectrum, and this is a problem."

More NetAlly EtherScope nXG cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."

"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."

"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."

"It's very expensive. I wish I could buy a few more and give them to all the people who could use it, or perhaps send it to a client, given that some of its features are easy to use. But sending something worth $8,000 or $9,000 is nerve-racking. It would be nice that if it were a lot less expensive."

"In terms of pricing, EtherScope isn't cheap. It's a significant investment, and not a budget option."

"As a business owner, it was a high price. However, it was well worth it. We have gotten our money out of it and continue to get our money out of it. For the price and usability, it is definitely worth it. The Wi-Fi survey capabilities alone justifies the price. Having all the other tools in it really adds to that."

"It's a pricey device, but I see value in it from a business perspective."

"It's the best 10Gig network tester for the price on the market."

"It is relatively high-priced and it should certainly not get any more expensive. I would like it to be $1,000 less, and I think everyone would say that. And of course, maintenance is also a recurring cost."

"It is worth it. The cost benefit of Link-Live is massive because it is included with the cost of the device and the licensing. A lot of people miss that part of it. It is not just the device that you get but it is the ability to look at all of that data later on. You're not having to do all of that on the device. You can just be there, use the device, and then look at the data from the comfort of your office or home afterward."

"If we were to purchase separate meters to do similar things, it would be double or triple the cost for us to have each toolkit available. Being a small business, putting that much money on a single truck is not cost-effective. Instead, we could put the analyzer, network heat map, and cable tester all in one meter. That is why we went for it."

More NetAlly EtherScope nXG pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Diagnostics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

58%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

10%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about NetAlly EtherScope nXG?

Being able to do a Wi-Fi walk-around survey with a handheld tool is one of the most valuable features of NetAlly EtherScope nXG.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetAlly EtherScope nXG?

In terms of pricing, EtherScope isn't cheap. It's a significant investment, and not a budget option.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetAlly EtherScope nXG?

The main area for improvement that stands out is the lack of a microburst dashboard, which some other vendors offer. However, NetAlly has carved out its niche by focusing on comprehensive network a...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 22% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 15% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 15% of the time

LiveAction LiveNX vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 12% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors

LinkRunner vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Compared 50% of the time

AirCheck G3 vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Compared 27% of the time

AirMagnet Survey vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Compared 13% of the time

LinkSprinter vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Compared 10% of the time

More NetAlly EtherScope nXG Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

March 2025

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations report

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report

Buyer's Guide

NetAlly EtherScope nXG

March 2025

Download NetAlly EtherScope nXG product report

Also Known As

No data available

EtherScope nXG, EtherScope, netAlly EtherScope, OptiView XG

Overview

The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

ExtraHop Networks

Multi-technology, all-in-one handheld network tester that enables engineers and technicians to get more done faster, from deployment to maintenance and documentation of their ever-changing Wi-Fi and Ethernet access networks.

The Etherscope nXG is the the industry’s first handheld analyzer for Wi-Fi 6/6E surveying (with AirMapper™ Site Survey), troubleshooting, and analysis.

NetAlly

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG

March 2025

Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG report.

See our list of best Network Diagnostics vendors.

We monitor all Network Diagnostics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.