Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

LinkRunner vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG comparison

LinkRunner and NetAlly EtherScope nXG are both solutions in the Network Troubleshooting category. LinkRunner is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0, while NetAlly EtherScope nXG is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. LinkRunner holds a 9.4% mindshare in NT, compared to NetAlly EtherScope nXG’s 8.3% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of LinkRunner users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetAlly EtherScope nXG users who would recommend it.
LinkRunner
Read 20 LinkRunner reviews
  • 1,991 Views
  • 1,991 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
NetAlly EtherScope nXG
Read 23 NetAlly EtherScope nXG reviews
  • 1,376 Views
  • 1,266 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 11, 2024

LinkRunner and NetAlly EtherScope nXG are two prominent network testing devices. NetAlly EtherScope nXG has the upper hand due to its advanced features and comprehensive functionality.

Features:LinkRunner offers simplicity, essential network testing tools, and affordability. NetAlly EtherScope nXG provides Wi-Fi analysis, automated testing capabilities, and a broader range of features.

Room for Improvement:LinkRunner could use more advanced testing features and a better screen. EtherScope nXG needs more frequent software updates and occasional bug fixes. Reviewers have fewer suggestions for EtherScope nXG, indicating a more polished product.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:LinkRunner is known for its quick setup and excellent customer service. EtherScope nXG is praised for detailed deployment guides but has a more complex setup. Both products receive high marks for customer service, with NetAlly slightly ahead due to extensive support resources.

Pricing and ROI:LinkRunner is favored for its lower upfront cost and rapid return on investment due to its basic functionality. Despite the higher price, NetAlly EtherScope nXG justifies its cost with a high ROI from its advanced features and versatility in various networking scenarios.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed LinkRunner vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG Report (Updated: February 2026).
Buyer's Guide
LinkRunner vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG
February 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 882,032 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

LinkRunner
Ranking in Network Troubleshooting
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NetAlly EtherScope nXG
Ranking in Network Troubleshooting
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Network Diagnostics (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Network Troubleshooting category, the mindshare of LinkRunner is 9.4%, down from 20.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetAlly EtherScope nXG is 8.3%, down from 12.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Troubleshooting Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
LinkRunner9.4%
NetAlly EtherScope nXG8.3%
Other82.3%
Network Troubleshooting
 

Featured Reviews

Jesse_B - PeerSpot reviewer
Jesse_B
Manager of networks and infrastructure at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
Impressive ease of use, gives comprehensive results in seconds, and saves a lot of time and resources
I've found the VLAN test feature to be most valuable. That's because not many devices do VLAN tests. Normally, I have to send a center technician to check a line and see if it's alive. If it's working, then I have to send a network technician out to log into a switch and see which port it's on and on which VLAN that port is. That's two persons and two separate visits. This device does all of this in a matter of seconds, and that has saved me a lot of time, troubleshooting, and resources. Its ease of use is very impressive. LinkRunner allows me to have my technicians run tests that are normally too complex and require a network specialist. AutoTest works with just one click. AutoTest does a lot of testing that would normally require a network specialist to log in to a switch and check out VLAN based on a port. My technicians don't have to log in to the switch anymore. They can just do AutoTest and information is provided online. So, I no longer have to send a specialist. I can have my technician run these very complex tests. It saves me on resources, time, and site visits. When it comes to troubleshooting, based on my experience, it has given very useful and very helpful information, especially for my field technicians. It has reduced my visits and the amount of presence because it gives a very comprehensive report on your network tests. It tests multiple variables and multiple parameters and gives a very informative report that makes it easy to pinpoint what is the root cause. There are many tools in this one solution. It's basically a bunch of toolkits or tool sets in one device, which makes it very powerful testing equipment.
Read full review
Doug Dickerson - PeerSpot reviewer
Doug Dickerson
Manager at Northwestern
Handheld form factor, intuitive interface that is easy to use, helps us quickly troubleshoot network problems
It would be helpful if this product interfaced with AirWave. The battery life should be improved. The real negative to the product is the horrible battery life. We had hoped for it to be able to deliver configurations to our network switches, and I think they're developing something for that. However, it doesn't do that now. We were hoping that we would, as we replace or refresh network components, be able to use this tool to push a config file to the switch. For example, the Aruba switches that we're deploying come with a Bluetooth function where we can push configs from our phones. It would be much more convenient to use this device, rather than using our personal cell phones to do it. I think that the capability is there, but it just hasn't been figured out yet.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Having the results sent directly, via email, from the LinkRunner itself makes it really great for logging different things that you're trying to document within your organization. You can have a paper trail of what your organization has as far as infrastructure goes."
"It is fast in providing results. It is pretty accurate."
"In terms of network validation, and copper and fiber Ethernet configuration, I can't imagine life without LinkRunner devices. The minute I got the 10G, everybody was fighting over it. They had never used such a device before and it was just breathtaking for them to very quickly see the validation you can gain from these devices."
"LinkRunner 10G is very handy for onsite troubleshooting and implementations. We can quickly identify the links in terms of 1G, 2.5G, 5G, and 10G on the copper side, and also from 1G up to 10G on the fiber side. It is very handy for me because we deal with a lot of banks. Especially for the provisioning of new services, we use this tool to identify the link capacity and do the necessary testing to ensure all the circuits are ready before the handover to the next team to operate the technology. This is something that saves a lot of time as compared to the old days."
"It provides a way to test 10Gig connectivity. Previously, we had to hook up a switch. That was our only way. Now, with LinkRunner, we can test on the fly if an SFP is bad or if the switch has the right configuration on it."
"The AutoTest feature makes it easy for you on both ends. It's an excellent feature, especially if you're by yourself. You plug one end in and you hit AutoTest. It sits and waits for you to plug in the other end and it starts testing."
"I've found the VLAN test feature to be most valuable. That's because not many devices do VLAN tests. Normally, I have to send a center technician to check a line and see if it's alive. If it's working, then I have to send a network technician out to log into a switch and see which port it's on and on which VLAN that port is. That's two persons and two separate visits. This device does all of this in a matter of seconds, and that has saved me a lot of time, troubleshooting, and resources."
"AutoTest is very helpful. It's very streamlined and it's very easy to set up and very easy to identify what we want to achieve. It's probably the feature we use the most. It provides us with LLTD, which is very useful."
More LinkRunner pros
"It cuts the time down in half. You don't need to get a laptop out and do different testing. We can just grab this one tool, bring it, and do all our network testing, surveying, and reviews to figure out what the problems are with just one device, instead of having to use multiple people and devices to do that. You cut down time by 50% because you won't normally need multiple people onsite. A lot of times, you can do everything with one person and one tool."
"The wireless aspect of it has been super valuable. The AirMagnet Survey feature is very useful for site surveys. For a long time, it used to be done on laptops, and now, we can do this simply on a handheld with one technician. The data automatically gets uploaded to the cloud so that our more experienced technicians can review the data and pull it into AirMagnet. This feature has saved tons of time. It's not easy to approximate the time saved, but for each survey, I'm taking a junior technician and getting him to do a role that a senior technician used to do. So, there is a cost-saving of at least 50%."
"My impression of the ease of use is that it definitely is easy to use both the handheld device and the app walking around."
"One of the standout features is its ability to serve as an advanced handheld packet analyzer. It excels in discovering both wired and wireless networks and automatically documenting them, which is really valuable. The tool provides insights from the physical layer up to layer seven, including HTTP, which helps diagnose network issues effectively. This automated documentation feature sets NetAlly apart from competitors, enhancing efficiency and accuracy in network management and recommendations. When the EtherScope nXG identifies a problem, it alerts us, allowing us to use more advanced tools for deeper analysis. Regarding PoE testing capabilities, I haven't explored them extensively, but I'm aware of their importance, especially for detecting issues like overloading switches with too many PoE devices. Integrators are becoming more cautious about these issues, but specialized tools like those from other vendors may offer features like microburst dashboards, which EtherScope nXG currently doesn't provide."
"One of the key measurements that we use out of the device is the channel utilization measurement, how much traffic is on the air in a given channel. That's the most valuable feature for us. The ability to make a very fast measurement of how much traffic is on the air is a key value. Otherwise we'd have to do a packet capture and do some analysis. It speeds up our testing."
"Being able to do a Wi-Fi walk-around survey with a handheld tool is one of the most valuable features of NetAlly EtherScope nXG."
"One of the biggest pros of AirMapper is that you just hit upload to the cloud and you can use anything with a web browser to look at it and manipulate it, view it, and even share it. The fact that you can review it now on any computer that has web access is phenomenal, versus using the client. That's been fantastic."
"I like EtherScope's WiFi scanning, heat map, and load testing. It's an excellent tool that sets you straight, so you don't need to beat around the bush or wait for other people. It's easy to share the reports with other people."
More NetAlly EtherScope nXG pros
 

Cons

"It is a great tool, but in the long-term, they can make its processor more powerful to do more functions. They can upgrade the hardware to make it run faster and more efficiently from the process point of view. That'll be beneficial because the technology is evolving and the network traffic is going higher and higher. We have to leverage better spec products to handle the traffic load."
"One area where LinkRunner could be improved is the battery life. Depending on which tests are run, it gets a decent six to eight hours. However, sometimes we need to do back-to-back shifts to meet a deadline, and we need access to an outlet to keep it plugged in and charging. It takes about an hour or two to charge."
"It runs tests quickly, but it takes a while to boot up. It's somewhat disappointing that LinkRunner takes some time to turn on. When I arrive in the space, I usually spend the first two minutes waiting."
"It is very stable. That being said, there is one feature that is not quite as stable as the rest of the product. You can leave it plugged into a location where you're doing some work and connect to it remotely by a program called VNC... sometimes that function breaks down, if you've been running for a couple of days... if you're remotely controlling it, you're probably not right next to it. That can be modestly annoying."
"It does take a little while to boot up if it's turned off."
"If it weren't for the battery, it would probably get an eight out of 10. But because of the battery, it's infuriating and it's not reliable."
"I wish they had software that could create continuous streams of traffic. I'm not sure if that's possible with LinkRunner, but it would be very helpful in some of the test case scenarios that clients are looking for, in regards to quality of service"
"Being really nitpicky about the LinkRunner G2, I wish the form factor was a little bit smaller. However, I'm sure that the size of the unit is compromised by the fact that the battery is large. If that were to mean having less battery life, I would not change it."
More LinkRunner cons
"There is room for improvement in the battery life and price."
"On a hardware spec, it'd be nice to have something above 10-Gigs."
"The largest complaint that we get is the battery life on the unit. If you are using it heavily, you get about five hours of usage out of it. In an eight hour day, that is not perfect for us. We would like more battery usage. The battery thing is annoying."
"For my usage, I thought the training would be maybe an hour, but I ended up having to spend an additional four to eight hours just to make sure I could adequately translate the data. So, using the tool was not that difficult, but translating the data is where there is a breakdown in what you are demonstrated and what you can actually do."
"If I could reset it remotely, meaning reboot the unit, that would be helpful. One time, the test would not respond; the script would lock up. I had to go and manually reboot it. If I could have sent a command to reboot and it would have automatically connected to the wireless, that would have made it perfect. That was the only thing that it did not do."
"The reporting could be better, with more accurate measurements of loss over cables, impedance, etc. The mapping also needs to be improved. You should be able to do free formatting of the topology."
"I would love to see port profiles. This is something I've expressed to them. The ability for a technician to plug it into a switch port, and say, "Okay, this port will be an access point or this port will be a phone and desktop PC," thus choosing a profile. It will then push a configuration to the device it's connected to and verify that the switch port is correctly configured, so I can hand this to a phone tech who doesn't have any access to a network switch to be able to make changes. They can go out and plug this into a port, then they are able to push a profile to the switch port through the device. That would be pretty fantastic as a next step for this device."
"The only improvement I can come up with is the battery life. If they could improve the battery life, that would be great."
More NetAlly EtherScope nXG cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They offer one price. I do like paying for support because I get software updates that way."
"Compared to another company's product, LinkRunner is cheaper, but it's still about $1,000 too expensive, considering that the operating system is a free operating system. The OS has just been tweaked to give you a graphical interface. I don't think it's priced right."
"We... decided to go with NetAlly for the price and the bang for the buck."
"I would buy another one if I had a chance but they're too expensive. If they made it a bit cheaper, I think a lot of network engineers and network administrators would immediately jump onto it."
"It was difficult to sell this to my management because the price is really high compared to other testing tools. However, we've seen a pretty good return on investment considering our outcomes and the time we have saved. The first year has been great."
"I didn't have to buy it, but if I was going to have my choice, I wouldn't buy it just because of the price point. It works pretty well to do one thing. For the cost, it is definitely not worth it. There are other products out there that can do the same thing for probably 70% less. I am not aware of any additional costs."
"The price was fine. You pay for the unit, and there are no licensing or maintenance fees."
"The area where the product could be improved is by having a lower cost so that I could have more than one. The price is competitive, but everybody would always like to see the price go down. I'd buy another one if it were cheaper."
More LinkRunner pricing and cost advice
"The pricing was a little bit high, but I understand that when you are getting multiple tools."
"It's a pricey device, but I see value in it from a business perspective."
"If we were to purchase separate meters to do similar things, it would be double or triple the cost for us to have each toolkit available. Being a small business, putting that much money on a single truck is not cost-effective. Instead, we could put the analyzer, network heat map, and cable tester all in one meter. That is why we went for it."
"We paid for the additional maintenance on it (for an extra year) to get that extra coverage. This was the first time that we had this solution in-house, and it was pretty pricey. So, we wanted to make sure that anything went wrong, then we could get it repaired."
"The pricing can be a little bit high for a handheld tool, mostly because, potentially, people do not understand what's in the package. However, NetAlly offers great bundled deals. We got a significantly good deal by ordering a package of these devices that had a whole test kit together. So, while it's very high, the value is certainly there, and the vendor does offer value-added features to offset that cost."
"The stuff is expensive. I really do wish the price would come down. I don't really call support. I haven't had a problem. But it's really expensive and every year I have to pay them a ton of money. I don't want to make up reasons to justify that cost, but I'm not using the support."
"It is relatively high-priced and it should certainly not get any more expensive. I would like it to be $1,000 less, and I think everyone would say that. And of course, maintenance is also a recurring cost."
"The pricing is very expensive, but this tool is the best."
More NetAlly EtherScope nXG pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Troubleshooting solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
882,032 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
University
11%
Healthcare Company
9%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Educational Organization
10%
Government
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetAlly EtherScope nXG?
In terms of pricing, EtherScope isn't cheap. It's a significant investment, and not a budget option.
See all answers
What needs improvement with NetAlly EtherScope nXG?
The main area for improvement that stands out is the lack of a microburst dashboard, which some other vendors offer. However, NetAlly has carved out its niche by focusing on comprehensive network a...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for NetAlly EtherScope nXG?
We mainly use NetAlly EtherScope nXG for troubleshooting. Linksprinter helps us solve problems and understand how things work. For example, SpamTitan is automatic, but beginners might not understan...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

LinkSprinter vs LinkRunner Logo
LinkSprinter vs LinkRunner
Compared 19% of the time
IxChariot vs LinkRunner Logo
IxChariot vs LinkRunner
Compared 18% of the time
AirCheck G3 vs LinkRunner Logo
AirCheck G3 vs LinkRunner
Compared 16% of the time
AirMagnet Survey PRO vs LinkRunner Logo
AirMagnet Survey PRO vs LinkRunner
Compared 13% of the time
OneTouch AT Network Assistant vs LinkRunner Logo
OneTouch AT Network Assistant vs LinkRunner
Compared 9% of the time
More LinkRunner Competitors
AirCheck G3 vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG Logo
AirCheck G3 vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG
Compared 18% of the time
AirMagnet Survey PRO vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG Logo
AirMagnet Survey PRO vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG
Compared 17% of the time
Wireshark vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG Logo
Wireshark vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG
Compared 13% of the time
OneTouch AT Network Assistant vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG Logo
OneTouch AT Network Assistant vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG
Compared 12% of the time
IxNetwork VE vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG Logo
IxNetwork VE vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG
Compared 6% of the time
More NetAlly EtherScope nXG Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
LinkRunner
January 2026
LinkRunner reportDownload LinkRunner product report
Buyer's Guide
NetAlly EtherScope nXG
January 2026
NetAlly EtherScope nXG reportDownload NetAlly EtherScope nXG product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
EtherScope nXG, EtherScope, netAlly EtherScope, OptiView XG
 

Overview

LinkRunner AT 3000 & 4000. Next Generation Copper and Fiber Ethernet AutoTester. Fast and comprehensive validation of network links and powerful copper and fiber network connectivity troubleshooting. Tests from 10Mbps to 10Gbps, PoE, VLAN, switch port, path analysis, packet capture, topology mapping and so much more!

NetAlly

Multi-technology, all-in-one handheld network tester that enables engineers and technicians to get more done faster, from deployment to maintenance and documentation of their ever-changing Wi-Fi and Ethernet access networks.

The Etherscope nXG is the the industry’s first handheld analyzer for Wi-Fi 6/6E surveying (with AirMapper™ Site Survey), troubleshooting, and analysis.

NetAlly
 

Sample Customers

Philips Healthcare, HCA Healthcare, University of South Dakota, Memorial Hermann, Baltimore County Public Schools, Aaramrak.
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
LinkRunner vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG
February 2026
Free Report: LinkRunner vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG
Find out what your peers are saying about LinkRunner vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
882,032 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our LinkRunner vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG report.
See our list of best Network Troubleshooting vendors.

We monitor all Network Troubleshooting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.