Falcon LogScale vs Mezmo comparison

CrowdStrike and Mezmo are both solutions in the Log Management category. CrowdStrike is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.3, while Mezmo is ranked #54. CrowdStrike holds a 0.6% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Mezmo’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Mezmo users who would recommend it.

Falcon LogScale

Read 3 Falcon LogScale reviews

998 Views
774 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mezmo

Read 2 Mezmo reviews

431 Views
248 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Falcon LogScale

Mezmo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Mezmo and Falcon LogScale are key players in the log management and analysis category. Falcon LogScale has an edge with its robust feature set, while Mezmo stands out for cost-effectiveness and customer support.

Features: Mezmo's simplicity and efficient log aggregation aid quick insights. Users value its straightforward approach that doesn't overwhelm with complexity. On the other hand, Falcon LogScale is praised for its advanced analytical tools and scalability, catering well to complex requirements. It combines depth and breadth in functionality, attracting enterprises looking for comprehensive log management solutions.

Room for Improvement: Users of Mezmo see opportunities for enhancing data ingestion speed and optimizing performance to handle larger data loads. They also suggest more reporting options for customized insights. For Falcon LogScale, users express a need for better integration with third-party tools, increased flexibility in deployment options, and improvements in user interface for simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mezmo is known for easy deployment and high-quality customer service, ensuring users feel supported from the start. Falcon LogScale, though more complex to deploy, benefits from detailed documentation and skilled support teams, making it suited for larger organizations requiring a robust setup and smooth problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Mezmo is appealing with low setup costs and favorable ROI, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious businesses. Falcon LogScale, while having higher initial costs, offsets this with high ROI through its extensive features, proving valuable for enterprises that prioritize advanced analytics over initial expenditure.

To learn more, read our detailed Falcon LogScale vs. Mezmo Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Falcon LogScale vs. Mezmo

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Falcon LogScale

Ranking in Log Management

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mezmo

Ranking in Log Management

54th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (76th), Observability Pipeline Software (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Falcon LogScale is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mezmo is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Shaik Shaheer

Security | SIEM Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management

It allows us to efficiently manage and store our data. Its compression and archiving features not only reduce storage costs but also minimize the infrastructure resources needed for data backup. Since we have multiple security solutions in place, it allows us to streamline data handling. We can selectively send security-related events to the SIEM while directing other non-security events from various tools to Falcon LogScale. This flexibility ensures that we have access to all the data we need when required, and we can easily export this data from it as necessary, optimizing our data management and making it readily available for analysis or other purposes.

Read full review

Theodore Omtzigt

President and Founder at STILLWATER SUPERCOMPUTING INC

Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently

Scalability could be improved. We are using it through the IBM cloud deployment and on some of the data centers that are very heavily used, there is a significant lag in the event stream, sometimes 10, 15 minutes behind, which makes the RCA impossible. If an event hits but you don't have the information to look at it, then it's tricky. This is probably not an issue of the product itself, but more a deployment issue. There is something on the IBM side that needs some readjustment to make certain these lags don't happen too often. We now use other tools for back-up in that area. But if you really want to do SIEM type work, then that is an aspect that needs some improvement. It's hard to tell if it's the product or the IBM deployment of it. The user interface is really very productive interactively but for an additional feature, it would be nice if we somehow could encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team so that specific types of actions can be carried out quickly. In particular, when we deal with a customer issue, it may pertain to a particular transaction through the system and each transaction has a unique ID. It would be great if we could query that ID and request all transactions that pertain to a specific ID. For now, we need to find the events, then extract the ID. Once we have that, we can go through the UI to set up the query and filter it to give us a transaction. But it would be really nice if we could simply say, "Here's the ID. Give me all the transactions."

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."

"One of the key features is the fast search functionality, enabling us to get results within a few seconds."

"The fast search and index-free data retention are very valuable."

"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."

"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."

Cons

"The price could be lower."

"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."

"The integration could improve."

"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."

"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Falcon LogScale?

It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Falcon LogScale?

The integration could improve. Easy parser writing should be an option to ingest log in a human-readable format for unsupported devices. For visibility perspective, the dashboard should be more use...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Falcon LogScale?

Initially, the log was for log management. We store our logs for achieving compliance and log retention for longer periods. This function, LogScale, is now a platform where we can do correlation as...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Elastic Stack vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 44% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 26% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 9% of the time

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 7% of the time

More Falcon LogScale Competitors

Datadog vs Mezmo

Compared 60% of the time

Cribl vs Mezmo

Compared 40% of the time

More Mezmo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

March 2025

Download Falcon LogScale product report

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Mezmo

April 2025

Download Mezmo product report

Also Known As

No data available

LogDNA

Overview

Falcon LogScale is a modern log management tool that offers robust features for organizations seeking efficient log analysis. It provides high-speed log ingestion and query capabilities, enabling detailed insights into system performance and security events.

Falcon LogScale provides an efficient way for IT teams to handle massive volumes of log data. Its architecture supports rapid ingestion and real-time querying, making it ideal for security and operational analytics. With customizable search capabilities, it allows deep analysis to detect anomalies and troubleshoot issues effectively. Users appreciate its scalability and performance-driven approach, making it suitable for large infrastructures.

What are the most important features of Falcon LogScale?

High-Speed Log Ingestion: Manages vast amounts of log data swiftly and efficiently.
Real-Time Querying: Enables quick analysis and insights into current data.
Scalability: Designed to grow with the expanding needs of large organizations.
Customizable Searching: Offers granular search options for precise data examination.

What benefits or ROI should be anticipated?

Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Streamlines log analysis processes.
Improved Security Posture: Identifies security threats quickly through powerful search and alert capabilities.
Cost-Effective Scaling: Offers scalable solutions that grow with business needs.
Time Savings: Reduces time spent on log data management and analysis.

Falcon LogScale is particularly beneficial in industries requiring detailed compliance reporting and real-time threat detection, such as finance and healthcare. It's implemented to support security operations and incident response teams by providing timely insights and operational efficiencies.

CrowdStrike

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Falcon LogScale vs. Mezmo

April 2025

Free Report: Falcon LogScale vs. Mezmo

Find out what your peers are saying about Falcon LogScale vs. Mezmo and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Falcon LogScale vs. Mezmo report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.