Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fireworks AI vs Hugging Face comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fireworks AI
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
16th
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Hugging Face
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2588646 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 6, 2024
Enhanced text-to-image creation with solid API and fine-tuning support
We primarily use Fireworks AI for text-to-image generation. We are developing a platform for artists to sell their art styles, where the system helps them tune a model and then sell images generated from their signature Fireworks AI has helped our organization by enabling us to create a platform…
AshishKumar11 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 25, 2024
Open-sourced, reliable, and enables organizations to finetune data for business requirements
Hugging Face is a website that provides various open-source models. We use them to finetune models for our business. It is just like ChatGPT, but ChatGPT has paid sources. If we have to call an API, we must pay for it. However, Hugging Face has various open-source models like Llama 2 and Llama 3…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Fireworks AI has a solid API and is quite easy to interact with."
"My preferred aspects are natural language processing and question-answering."
"It is stable."
"What I find the most valuable about Hugging Face is that I can check all the models on it and see which ones have the best performance without using another platform."
"The tool's most valuable feature is that it shows trending models. All the new models, even Google's demo models, appear at the top. You can find all the open-source models in one place. You can use them directly and easily find their documentation. It's very simple to find documentation and write code. If you want to work with AI and machine learning, Hugging Face is a perfect place to start."
"The solution is easy to use compared to other frameworks like PyTorch and TensorFlow."
"Hugging Face provides open-source models, making it the best open-source and reliable solution."
"The tool's most valuable feature is that it's open-source and has hundreds of packages already available. This makes it quite helpful for creating our LLMs."
"There are numerous libraries available, and the documentation is rich and step-by-step, helping us understand which model to use in particular conditions."
 

Cons

"When using the API, it does not return information about the charges for image generation, which would be useful for our solution."
"Hugging Face could improve by implementing a search engine or chat bot feature similar to ChatGPT."
"I believe Hugging Face has some room for improvement. There are some security issues. They provide code, but API tokens aren't indicated. Also, the documentation for particular models could use more explanation. But I think these things are improving daily. The main change I'd like to see is making the deployment of inference endpoints more customizable for users."
"I've worked on three projects using Hugging Face, and only once did we encounter a problem with the code. We had to use another open-source embedding from OpenAI to resolve it. Our team has three members: me, my colleague, and a team leader. We looked at the problem and resolved it."
"The area that needs improvement would be the organization of the materials. It could be clearer and more systematic. It would be good if the layout was clear and we could search the models easily."
"The solution must provide an efficient LLM."
"Initially, I faced issues with the solution's configuration."
"Most people upload their pre-trained models on Hugging Face, but more details should be added about the models."
"It can incorporate AI into its services."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I recall seeing a fee of nine dollars, and there's also an enterprise option priced at twenty dollars per month."
"The tool is open-source. The cost depends on what task you're doing. If you're using a large language model with around 12 million parameters, it will cost more. On average, Hugging Face is open source so you can download models to your local machine for free. For deployment, you can use any cloud service."
"The solution is open source."
"Hugging Face is an open-source solution."
"We do not have to pay for the product."
"So, it's requires expensive machines to open services or open LLM models."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
University
17%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
University
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Hugging Face?
My preferred aspects are natural language processing and question-answering.
What needs improvement with Hugging Face?
Hugging Face could improve by implementing a search engine or chat bot feature similar to ChatGPT. This would aid developers in easily finding how to fine-tune models with specific data or get mode...
What is your primary use case for Hugging Face?
I use Hugging Face primarily to work with open LLM models. I recently started using the open LOM models and also use embedding models. I use these models to train custom data and monitor our deskto...
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in AI Development Platforms. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.