Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.4
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway offers high returns through efficient cloud management, security assurance, and reduced resource needs for organizations.
Sentiment score
7.8
Perception Point Advanced Email Security enhances protection, cuts false positives, and reduces workload, providing efficient, cost-effective email threat management.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway support varies in efficiency; response times and expertise depend on package and location.
Sentiment score
7.7
Perception Point offers efficient, professional 24/7 email security support, praised for prompt, knowledgeable service and high customer engagement.
There are instances where both the response time and technical support quality need improvement.
Customer service and support are good, but there is room for improvement in response time.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is highly scalable, supporting large enterprises, with successful expansion through hardware or cloud solutions.
Sentiment score
8.0
Perception Point Advanced Email Security excels in scalable, cloud-based infrastructure, ensuring seamless adaptability and performance for growing businesses.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is stable and reliable, though some users report minor latency and connectivity issues.
Sentiment score
8.4
Perception Point Advanced Email Security is highly stable and reliable, with minimal downtime and strong user satisfaction in performance.
 

Room For Improvement

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway needs enhancements in authentication, reporting, scalability, interface, integration, and support for better performance.
Perception Point needs improved threat detection, user interface, and integration with added DLP, phishing protection, and security training features.
They need to enhance their CASB solutions since currently, the cloud index support is low compared to competitors.
Integration and end-user interaction can be improved as the current system does not allow end-users to send back information to the platform, unlike Google Workspace or competitive tools like Ironscales.
 

Setup Cost

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway offers flexible, user-based pricing; costs vary by environment, user count, and feature additions.
Perception Point Advanced Email Security provides fair pricing, flexible configurations, and value, suitable for diverse budgets and strategic ROI.
 

Valuable Features

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway excels in security, flexible policies, real-time analytics, and user-friendly management for comprehensive internet safety.
Perception Point offers advanced email security with robust threat detection, user-friendly interface, and efficient scanning without MX changes.
As organizations move away from legacy applications and data centers, the SASE architecture and ZTNA-based operations become essential.
Perception Point Advanced Email Security has a correct price point and offers very good email filtering capabilities.
 

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway
Ranking in Internet Security
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (8th), Web Content Filtering (1st)
Perception Point Advanced E...
Ranking in Internet Security
6th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (17th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Internet Security category, the mindshare of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is 6.8%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perception Point Advanced Email Security is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Internet Security
 

Featured Reviews

Shipra Gupta - PeerSpot reviewer
Simple to set up, reliable, and offers great reporting
On the DLP, we are on version 8.9.1, and on the Web Gateway, we are on version 8.5.4. We are using both on-premises and cloud deployments. We are integrators. I am mainly dealing in Forcepoint, including Forcepoint Web Gateway, Forcepoint DLP, and a little bit of Forcepoint Email as well. The presales part of the onboarding process has to be very, very proper. Whatever requirements the users are looking for, that should be put on paper, however. Otherwise, if they're expecting something else and the solution is providing something else, this sometimes creates an issue at a later date. Clients need to know what they are getting into. I’d rate the solution eight out of ten.
Jijin Joseph - PeerSpot reviewer
Gives in-depth analysis reports to end users for any malicious content found in emails
Our users would like the solution to scan outgoing emails. So, if my system is compromised, and I have malicious content in my system, then there is a possibility that I send malicious email to my colleague. There is a dependency on AWS cloud.This means if the cloud service is down, which may impact the perception point's email delivery.So it would be great if there is any HA for the solution. I would like a user-friendly configuration, like APIs. This solution is API-friendly configuration by following the steps provided. It would be great if it could be automate it, like the Avanan.Also, it would be good if Perception Point Advanced Email Security could have an MSP model. During the early stages of working with this solution, there were some constraints and issues.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Internet Security solutions are best for your needs.
849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Retailer
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway?
The product's user management is an area where my company does not face any challenges.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway?
The price for Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is normal, rated around five to six out of ten.
What needs improvement with Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway?
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway ( /products/forcepoint-secure-web-gateway-reviews ) could be improved by offering a SaaS-based service, which is increasingly being adopted in the market. They need to...
What do you like most about Perception Point Advanced Email Security?
The most valuable feature is the technical support services.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perception Point Advanced Email Security?
In Brazil, the dollar price affects the cost. Perception Point Advanced Email Security is about 50 percent less expensive.
What needs improvement with Perception Point Advanced Email Security?
There are always places for improvement, but this needs deeper thought and planning. Integration and end-user interaction can be improved as the current system does not allow end-users to send back...
 

Also Known As

Forcepoint SWG, Websense Web Security, Forcepoint TRITON
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Adventist Health, Alphawest, Amadori, Anoka County, Compartamos Banco, Davies Turner, EverBank, iGATE, Karlstad Municipality, Lake Michigan Credit Union, Scavolini, Smurfit Kappa, Toyota
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs. Perception Point Advanced Email Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.