Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs PyCharm comparison

OpenText and JetBrains are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2, while JetBrains is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5. OpenText holds a 11.5% mindshare in SCAS, compared to JetBrains’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Read 17 Fortify Static Code Analyzer reviews

1,809 Views
1,210 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

PyCharm

Read 11 PyCharm reviews

155 Views
40 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

PyCharm

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Fortify Static Code Analyzer and PyCharm compete in the software development tools category, focusing on security and integrated development environments, respectively. Fortify seems to have the upper hand in vulnerability identification and security integration, while PyCharm holds an advantage in user-friendliness and Python development support.

Features: Fortify Static Code Analyzer is equipped with robust security features, providing detailed analysis and vulnerability identification for over 30 programming languages. It automates security testing and integrates with CI/CD pipelines. PyCharm offers smart code analysis, debugging capabilities, and strong support for Python development. It integrates with GitHub and includes a large library of plugins, enhancing virtual environment management.

Room for Improvement: Fortify Static Code Analyzer could improve by reducing false positives, enhancing user experience, and expanding language support. Simplifying the configuration process and improving plugin integration across IDEs are also desirable. PyCharm could enhance resource management and navigation while expanding support for more languages. Improving integration capabilities with various tools and optimizing performance to consume less memory are recommended.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify Static Code Analyzer is often deployed on-premises or in hybrid cloud environments, with users valuing its proactive technical support but desiring quicker resolutions. PyCharm is also deployed on-premises, with users generally satisfied with available online resources for issue resolution, reducing the need for direct support. Customer service for PyCharm is well-rated, with high user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Fortify Static Code Analyzer is perceived as expensive with high licensing costs, making it more suitable for enterprises. Many users report significant ROI due to its comprehensive security features. PyCharm offers a free community edition, enhancing accessibility, and its professional edition is reasonably priced. Users find PyCharm's pricing competitive and appreciate the cost-effectiveness of its community edition.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. PyCharm Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. PyCharm

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PyCharm

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of Fortify Static Code Analyzer is 11.5%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PyCharm is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Provides extensive language support and enhances secure coding practices

The deployment of Fortify Static Code Analyzer needs to be simplified. It should be easier to install, perhaps through a container-based approach where everything is combined into one image or pack of containers. This change would facilitate easier installations and ensure all necessary components are connected and ready to use.

Read full review

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

Convenient to use and surely increases the effectiveness of software development

The solution does not support some features of OpenCV even though it is part of a PyCharm package. Open CV is used to develop software that involves computer vision tasks. It seems the solution is not fully updated to use the latest PyCharm packages. I would like even more support toward robotics-related software tools. For example, support of ROS, ROS 1, and ROS 2 development would ensure that I continue to use the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reference provided for each issue is extremely helpful."

"We write software, and therefore, the most valuable aspect for us is basically the code analysis part."

"I like the Fortify taxonomy as it provides us with a list of all of the vulnerabilities found. Fortify release updated rule packs quarterly, with accompanying documentation, that lets us know what new features are being released."

"I recommend this product due to its good pricing, extensive language support, valuable features, and additional features like Fortify Academy."

"The integration Subset core integration, using Jenkins is one of the good features."

"You can really see what's happening after you've developed something."

"Automating the Jenkins plugins and the build title is a big plus."

"Its flexibility is most valuable. It is such a flexible tool. It can be implemented in a number of ways. It can do anything you want it to do. It can be fully automated within a DevOps pipeline. It can also be used in an ad hoc, special test case scenario and anywhere in between."

More Fortify Static Code Analyzer pros

"The product's IDE feature is quite user-friendly."

"The solution has a great debugging feature."

"The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone."

"We have integrated the tool with GitHub. PyCharm provides easy integration with GitHub, allowing us to push changes directly. Many plugins are available on PyCharm for GitHub integration, including GitHub Copilot for auto code completion and GitHub Copilot Chat for assistance with code-related queries."

"Good syntax highlighting and very it's very customizable."

"PyCharm has an excellent user experience, and I appreciate its cross-platform capabilities."

"The solution has a nice environment and extensions that make it easy to develop software."

"The automated package installation is helpful. I like the code highlighting features. A huge library of plugins is available, including AI coding tools, though I don't use those myself. The debugging tools are good, showing errors and problem lines."

More PyCharm pros

Cons

"The generation of false positives should be reduced."

"Their licensing is expensive."

"I know the areas that they are trying to improve on. They've been getting feedback for several years. There are two main points. The first thing is keeping current with static code languages. I know it is difficult because code languages pop up all the time or there are new variants, but it is something that Fortify needs to put a better focus on. They need to keep current with their language support. The second thing is a philosophical issue, and I don't know if they'll ever change it. They've done a decent job of putting tools in place to mitigate things, but static code analysis is inherently noisy. If you just take a tool out of the box and run a scan, you're going to get a lot of results back, and not all of those results are interesting or important, which is different for every organization. Currently, we get four to five errors on the side of tagging, and it notifies you of every tiny inconsistency. If the tool sees something that it doesn't know, it flags, which becomes work that has to be done afterward. Clients don't typically like it. There has got to be a way of prioritizing. There are a ton of filter options within Fortify, but the problem is that you've got to go through the crazy noisy scan once before you know which filters you need to put in place to get to the interesting stuff. I keep hearing from their product team that they're working on a way to do container or docker scanning. That's a huge market mover. A lot of people are interested in that right now, and it is relevant. That is definitely something that I'd love to see in the next version or two."

"Fortify's software security center needs a design refresh."

"False positives need improvement in the future. Fortify's vulnerability remediation guidance helps improve code security, but I think they need to improve the focus of the solution, as it still contains many bugs and needs a thorough review."

"It comes with a hefty licensing fee."

"Streamlining the upgrade process and enhancing compatibility would make it easier for us to keep our security tools up-to-date."

"Not all languages are supported in Fortify."

More Fortify Static Code Analyzer cons

"There is room for improvement in memory usage. It uses too much memory. It can get a bit heavy, especially when you have too many open files and the system becomes very slow."

"One issue with JetBrains tools, including PyCharm, is their heavy resource usage. They can be slow to start, especially when beginning a new project, as it takes some time to index."

"They should improve the product's interactiveness."

"Notebooks in PyCharm is not as intuitive as it could be."

"The solution does not support some features of OpenCV even though it is part of a PyCharm package."

"The solution is heavy because running it on laptops consumes a lot of memory and power. Typically, a laptop battery might last about eight to nine hours, but with the tool running, it reduces to two hours or one and a half hours at most. It is designed to handle large projects and heavy tasks, making it resource-intensive. For smaller projects, use IDEs like Visual Studio Code."

"The navigation can be better."

"PyCharm's use of system resources can get pretty heavy. Loading, in particular, takes longer than I would like and I think they should optimize it so that it's a bit lighter on the system."

More PyCharm cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer as a seven out of ten since it is a bit expensive."

"Although I am not responsible for the budget, Fortify SAST is expensive."

"The licensing is expensive and is in the 50K range."

"It has a couple of license models. The one that we use most frequently is called their flexible deployment. We use this one because it is flexible and based on the number of code-contributing developers in the organization. It includes almost everything in the Fortify suite for one developer price. It gives access to not just the secure code analyzer (SCA) but also to FSC, the secure code. It gives us accessibility to scan central, which is the decentralized scanning farm. It also gives us access to the software security center, which is the vulnerability management platform."

"The setup costs and pricing for Fortify may vary depending on the organization's needs and requirements."

"From our standpoint, we are significantly better off with Fortify due to the favorable pricing we secured five years ago."

"There is a licensing fee, and if you bring them to the company and you want them to do the installation and the implementation in the beginning, there is a separate cost. Similarly, if you want consultation or training, there is a separate cost. I see it as suitable only for enterprises. I do not see it suitable for a small business or individual use."

"The price of Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be reduced."

"The community edition is free, which is good."

"The price is reasonable."

"I use the free community version, so I'm saving money there."

"The community edition is free and the professional edition has a licensing fee."

"I don't have much info on the pricing, but I would say it is somewhat competitive."

"They have a free Community edition, and they also have a licensed version. They definitely have an annual license. They probably also have a monthly license. Its pricing is good and reasonable. It is a little bit more expensive than the others, but it is well worth it. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

Integrating the Fortify Static Code Analyzer into our software development lifecycle was straightforward. It highlights important information beyond just syntax errors. It identifies issues like pa...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

I rate the pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer as a seven out of ten since it is a bit expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

False positives need improvement in the future. Fortify's vulnerability remediation guidance helps improve code security, but I think they need to improve the focus of the solution, as it still Con...

See all answers

What do you like most about PyCharm?

The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PyCharm?

Customizing the tool can make it complicated.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PyCharm?

I use PyCharm as my main IDE for Python coding.

See all answers

Comparisons

Black Duck vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 35% of the time

Snyk vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 18% of the time

Veracode vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 13% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 8% of the time

GitLab vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 7% of the time

More Fortify Static Code Analyzer Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

March 2025

Download Fortify Static Code Analyzer product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

February 2025

Download PyCharm product report

Also Known As

Fortify Static Code Analysis SAST

No data available

Overview

Fortify Static Code Analyzer (SCA) utilizes numerous algorithms in addition to a dynamic intelligence base of secure coding protocols to investigate an application’s source code for any potential risk of malicious or dangerous threats. Additionally, the solution will prioritize the most critical concerns and give direction on how users can repair those concerns. This solution researches each and every potential route that workflow and data can travel to discover and repair all possible vulnerabilities. Fortify SCA allows users to create safe and secure software quickly. Users are able to discover potential security gaps more quickly with precise outcomes and repair them immediately.

Fortify Static Code Analyzer Benefits

CI/CD pipeline security: Fortify SCA integrates well with third-party tools such as ALM Octane, Atlassian Bamboo, Azure DevOps, Eclipse, Jenkins, and Jira. It offers real-time scan results, immediate recommendations, and collaborative auditing, and finds threats faster. It also discovers and prioritizes weaknesses to reduce risk.
Cost-effective: Improves coding actions by training users as they work to better understand the relationship of static application security testing (SAST). Fortify SCA is able to find more vulnerabilities than other solutions and delivers significantly fewer false positives.
Quick and reliable scanning: Fortify SCA will discover and eradicate weaknesses in byte, binary, or source code. SAST is able to stop the bulk of code issues at the start of development. The solution is able to discover 815 specific categories of risk, works through 27 programming languages and more than one million different APIs. Fortify SCA has a positive rate of 100% in the OWASP 1.2 benchmark.

Fortify Static Code Analyzer Features

Flexible deployment: Using Fortify On Demand, users can work in a complete SaaS environment. Fortify Hosted allows users to use on-premises and SaaS to work in a secure virtual space with complete control. Fortify-On-Prem gives users absolute control of the Fortify SCA solution.
Security assistant: Users have an interactive guide as they create code that provides risk analysis and anticipated outcomes. Security Assistant is an outstanding immediate feedback tool that gives instant results with significantly fewer false positives.
Audit assistant: This feature uses machine learning to reduce manual audit time while prioritizing the most important risks to users' networks. It provides automated audits in minutes. Any manual examinations are reduced, all issues are prioritized in accordance with organizational needs, and Fortify SCA consistently provides audit results to all projects.

Results from Real Users

“Fortify Static Code Analyzer tells us if there are any security leaks or not. If there are, then it's notifying us and does not allow us to pass the DevOps pipeline. If it finds everything's perfect, as per our given guidelines, then it is allowing us to go ahead and start it, and we are able to deploy it.” - Arun D., Senior Architect at a healthcare company.

“Its flexibility is most valuable. It is such a flexible tool. It can be implemented in a number of ways. It can do anything you want it to do. It can be fully automated within a DevOps pipeline. It can also be used in an ad hoc, special test case scenario and anywhere in between.” - Tom H., Director of Security at Merito

OpenText

Be More Productive
Save time while PyCharm takes care of the routine. Focus on the bigger things and embrace the keyboard-centric approach to get the most of PyCharm's many productivity features.

JetBrains

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. PyCharm

March 2025

Free Report: Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. PyCharm

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. PyCharm and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. PyCharm report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.