Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Sophos Network Access Control comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
9.0
Fortinet FortiNAC's support is responsive with effective community forums, but faces issues with expertise, documentation, and communication.
Sentiment score
6.9
Sophos Network Access Control support is praised for responsiveness, knowledgeable reps, fast resolutions, and reliable local availability despite time zone delays.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.7
Fortinet FortiNAC faces challenges in user-friendliness, integration, learning curve, support, compatibility, pricing, and configuration complexity.
Sentiment score
4.8
Sophos Network Access Control needs better integration, reduced resource use, and improved interface, pricing, and AI features for enhancement.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Fortinet FortiNAC is highly scalable, adaptable for various environments, and praised for flexible licensing and system integration.
Sentiment score
6.7
Sophos Network Access Control is scalable and modular, ideal for medium and large enterprises, but may be costly for smaller entities.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Fortinet FortiNAC pricing is high but competitive, offering feature-rich value, with reasonable maintenance for prioritized visibility and control.
No sentiment score available
Sophos Network Access Control offers flexible, modular pricing, considered mid-range, varying by enterprise needs and configuration requirements.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Fortinet FortiNAC is generally stable, with occasional issues during updates and HA setups, improving in recent versions.
Sentiment score
8.5
Sophos Network Access Control is highly praised for stability, reliability, and seamless integration, with users rating it very highly.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.3
Fortinet FortiNAC delivers IoT visibility, compliance checks, automation, security, user-friendly interfaces, and integration, enhancing device management flexibility.
Sentiment score
8.1
Sophos Network Access Control excels in security, OSI integration, scalability, user-friendly interface, and reliable support with low resource use.
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiNAC
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sophos Network Access Control
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiNAC is 17.7%, up from 15.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sophos Network Access Control is 1.3%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Access Control (NAC)
 

Featured Reviews

Batu Akalin - PeerSpot reviewer
I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor
I like FortiNAC's integration with other Fortinet devices. They work together well, but the solution also works with other network devices. FortiNAC has improved our security posture because we made some use-case scenarios for unauthorized devices. When unauthorized device IDs enter our network, and the associated team sees a new device, they can block the attackers.
Marco-VIVALDELLI - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable with good security capabilities and an easy setup
The user interface, in terms of managing the product, could be better. For example, having some sort of configuration scanner could be useful. I need some sort of base solution that I can provide to the company to set up a first level of service for the company. That way, I can install the product and set up a first level of security. After that, we can run some analysis with the company, with the key manager, and so on, and then customize the product to better suit their needs. It would help us create more tailored policies. That said, we need to have some base configuration that we can use as a kickoff in terms of saying, "Okay, this is a first-level configuration; that is enough to guarantee a correct level of protection from your point of view." And in this way, there is the possibility in the weeks to follow to customize the product better and more effectively over time to introduce a second level of features more specific to a single company. What could be an improvement, and what more competitors are doing, is introducing more advanced features in terms of artificial intelligence. This product needs more AI. It's useful to introduce systems to help prevent problems and better identify issues. The product needs to centralize information from devices and work to create a common database where an AI algorithm could have access to all of the information worldwide and therefore become better at predicting issues and finding problems. They need to widen their vision in the way competitors are to provide a higher level of security going forward.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
34%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
10%
Educational Organization
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is the biggest difference between Aruba ClearPass and FortiNAC?
I've done quite a lot of work with ClearPass, and not a lot with FortiNAC/Bradford. ClearPass incorporates a number of different functions including ClearPass Guest for creating complex wireless g...
How does Cisco ISE compare with Fortinet FortiNAC?
Cisco ISE uses AI endpoint analytics to identify new devices based on their behavior. It will also notify you if someone plugs in with a device that is not allowed and will block it. The user exper...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiNAC?
The support responds to our queries within two to four hours.
What do you like most about Sophos Network Access Control?
Sophos Network Access Control has a useful interface, and I like its dashboard, which is very useful for us to check everything.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Network Access Control?
I am not able to say much on the financial specifics as it pertains to the sales unit.
What needs improvement with Sophos Network Access Control?
For now, I may not be able to say exactly what needs improvement. However, continuous development in specific areas might be required.
 

Also Known As

FortiNAC, Bradford Networks, Bradford Networks Sentry, Network Sentry Family
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Isavia, Pepperdine University, Medical University of South Carolina, Columbia University Medical Center, Utah Valley University
Rushmoor Borough Council
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiNAC vs. Sophos Network Access Control and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.