Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortra's Cobalt Strike vs SafeBreach comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortra's Cobalt Strike
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
9th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SafeBreach
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) category, the mindshare of Fortra's Cobalt Strike is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SafeBreach is 7.6%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2519427 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 30, 2024
Compact, versatile, creates shell codes for bypassing antivirus and built-in report templates streamline the process
Probably its delivery methods could be improved. It might need some improvements on its spear phishing module. You can clone a web page, and then you can spear phish a target, and the target connects to your beacon. I believe that it needs to be more modernized to the current standards of multi-factor authentication bypass. Although there are already tools that actually do that, like Evilginx that’s been used as a proxy server, I truly believe Cobalt Strike could do something like that. I believe if Cobalt modernize this specific feature to try to bypass multi-factor authentication, it’s gonna be something. I’m not aware if it’s actually a feature in the latest Cobalt Strike updates, but from my version, I don’t see that it’s possible right now. I don’t think AI is at the stage where it can conduct such complex operations. AI is mostly being used to create phishing templates, very simple stuff. AI is not mature enough to do something more complex, although I truly believe that in a few years, it might have such capabilities.
Dmytro Petrashchuk - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 14, 2022
Breach and attach simulation solution used to test security tools with a valuable library of hacking data
This is a breach and attach simulation solution and we use it to test different security tools and to check how effective our client's infrastructure is.  The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods. It can run different attacks in a safe manner without…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It also made a lot of post-exploitation activities easier."
"The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods."
"The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection."
 

Cons

"Probably its delivery methods could be improved."
"I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support."
"There is room for improvement in the interface. It is not always easy to find the options that you need and not everything is customizable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's expensive."
"The pricing is more expensive than other options on the market today."
"The price starts from about $140,000 so this solution is expensive in my opinion. Maintenance and support is included in the license cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortra's Cobalt Strike?
As far as I know, at my previous job, our Red Teamers were using Cobalt Strike. It was heavily customized for their own engagement. The license is about € 6,000.00 per year or maybe more. It’s very...
What needs improvement with Fortra's Cobalt Strike?
Probably its delivery methods could be improved. It might need some improvements on its spear phishing module. You can clone a web page, and then you can spear phish a target, and the target connec...
What is your primary use case for Fortra's Cobalt Strike?
I use it a lot for independent research. I have a copy with me on my Kali box. There’s a good reason that it’s currently the best C2 in the market right now. It’s because of its versatility; you ca...
What do you like most about SafeBreach?
The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SafeBreach?
The pricing is more expensive than other options on the market today.
What needs improvement with SafeBreach?
I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support.
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
PayPal, ICON, Netflix, Johnson & Johnson, CVS Health, Pepsi, Kellogg's, Cisco, Deloitte
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.