Fortra's Intermapper vs Nagios Core comparison

Fortra and Nagios are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Fortra is ranked #84, while Nagios is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Fortra holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Nagios’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

Fortra's Intermapper

Read 4 Fortra's Intermapper reviews

376 Views
232 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

Read 51 Nagios Core reviews

4,253 Views
3,272 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Fortra's Intermapper

Nagios Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Fortra's Intermapper and Nagios Core are competing products in network monitoring. Intermapper is favored for its ease of deployment and customer service, whereas Nagios Core is preferred for its comprehensive features and customization.

Features: Intermapper offers real-time network mapping and monitoring with user-friendly dashboards. It provides detailed network visualization, intuitive interface, and built-in alerting capabilities. Nagios Core features an extensive plugin ecosystem, advanced customization options, and scalability. It supports complex monitoring needs and detailed performance metrics analysis.

Room for Improvement: Intermapper could enhance its feature set with more customization options, wider integration capabilities, and expanded analytics. Additionally, increasing its plugin variety could add depth. Nagios Core can improve its user-friendliness, streamline its setup process, and develop professional customer service options instead of relying solely on community support. Simplifying its configuration method would attract a broader user base.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortra's Intermapper is recognized for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, facilitating quick implementation and support. In contrast, Nagios Core, though requiring a more complex setup due to its flexible configuration, lacks dedicated customer service, pushing users towards community-based assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Intermapper has a clear pricing structure favorable for short-term ROI, featuring lower initial setup costs. Nagios Core, with its free open-source model, presents a cost-effective long-term return despite potential additional expenses from customizations and integrations. Intermapper enables predictable cost estimation, while Nagios Core suits those with technical skills and specific needs, offering potential savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra's Intermapper vs. Nagios Core Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. Nagios Core

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,190 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra's Intermapper

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

84th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nagios Core

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Fortra's Intermapper is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.0%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Andrian Lubimov

SVP of Networking and Operations at Skywire Networks

It tremendously cuts down our troubleshooting timeframe, but needs advanced SLA monitoring and reporting

They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit.

Read full review

Nishith-Vyas

Tech Lead at STL Digital Limited

Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements

The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What is really cool about HelpSystems InterMapper is that because of its SNMP base, you can integrate all different makes and models on the same map. You, of course, can have more than one map, but you have an option to have visibility into the entire network from one centralized system. You can monitor IPs, routers, radios, DC power plants, and UPS. You can do it all from one network management and monitoring solution. That's what really makes HelpSystems Intermapper great. Another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper is that you can really bundle different probes under one device. You can have a bundled device. You can monitor the physical status of a host based on the IP availability. You can also monitor services and actually see if anything happens. You can quickly determine whether it is the application layer, host layer, or network layer. HelpSystems Intermapper gives such a unique representation of a network. Ever since we started using HelpSystems InterMapper, we don't have to document everything in a detailed format and store it somewhere. Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing. So, in my opinion, it is awesome. When you have your SNMP topology defined, you don't require a dedicated NMS engineer to manage your system, which is another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper. I see how our operators get so excited by having the ability to map a device or interface and connect interfaces together. HelpSystems InterMapper is also very operator friendly; not just user friendly, but also operator friendly. This is a unique feature, and it works really great."

"It's a nice graphical interface, a nice map, that relates Layer 1 to Layer 3, virtually instantly, to the Helpdesk support staff. It provides a default place to get critical information so we can deploy our staff."

"It's all today portal-based which is a good feature for us."

"The most valuable features are its: log history, real-time monitoring capabilities, accuracy - the number of false positives is very low, and the mapping features."

"It is fairly easy to set up, and we can monitor pretty much everything we want to."

"Nagios monitors our servers, so we know if anything goes wrong and can solve the problem before it happens."

"I would rate the overall solution ten points out of ten."

"Our customers like that Nagios Core is an open source solution. It can be customized to our customers' specific needs."

"We mostly use Nagios Core to integrate with Python and Bash Script."

"The good thing about Nagios Core is it covers everything."

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it offers proper alerting capabilities."

"The most valuable feature is the performance parameters of the system."

More Nagios Core pros

Cons

"They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit."

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it. If we were able to run scripts to bounce ports on switches, that would be great. It's asking a lot, but it's actually very doable because I do it through scripting into other products. If we could incorporate that directly into Intermapper, that would be fantastic."

"It's a smaller solution so tools are not as advanced as you would find in a larger solution"

"Would benefit from aggregations if a particular server goes down."

"Nagios Core is limited in terms of distributed setups, and there is no central view for remote data centers."

"t was a little hard to get our setup represented in the configuration."

"The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak."

"I believe Nagios Core will need to provide an option for big data platforms in the future."

"The interface could be improved."

"The core version is no match for the XI version."

"Nagios Core does not have a graphic display."

More Nagios Core cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The product is cheaply priced."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Nagios Core is free to use."

"We have saved a lot of time, money, and effort in reducing disaster times, which is owed to Nagios quick alerting."

"Nagios Core is an open source solution, and there are no licensing fees."

"It's free."

"Most the plugin features are free."

"The Nagios Core (PNP4Nagios + Core) is free and can be setup by Netadmin within a few hours. The only additional cost is the cloud server."

More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

27%

Government

16%

University

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Nagios Core?

What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 55% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 45% of the time

More Fortra's Intermapper Competitors

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 26% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 18% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 14% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 9% of the time

OP5 Monitor vs Nagios Core

Compared 4% of the time

More Nagios Core Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

March 2025

Download Fortra's Intermapper product report

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core

April 2025

Download Nagios Core product report

Also Known As

HelpSystems Intermapper

No data available

Overview

Fortra's software frees you up to focus on what matters most, aligning IT and business goals to help organizations build a competitive edge. Intermapper is network monitoring software for organizations who want to monitor their IT infrastructure in real time.

With Intermapper, you can visualize all your physical and virtual network components on a live map and get up-to-date performance data on its availability. Powerful and user-friendly, Intermapper helps leading businesses prevent costly outages and maximize uptime for 24/7 availability of network resources.

Features include flexible monitoring for anything with an IP address, free probes to monitor different types of equipment from various vendors, dynamic network mapping, bandwidth monitoring, real-time alerts, and remote access. Our add-on integration with Automate allows you to remediate network failures and conduct network self-healing.

Intermapper runs on Mac, Windows, and Linux.

Fortra

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

Sample Customers

Greater Media Detroit, University of British Columbia, Don's Farm Supply

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. Nagios Core

April 2025

Free Report: Fortra's Intermapper vs. Nagios Core

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra's Intermapper vs. Nagios Core and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra's Intermapper vs. Nagios Core report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.