Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Functionize vs mabl comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Functionize
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
16th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
mabl
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
28th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (35th), Regression Testing Tools (18th), API Testing Tools (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Functionize is 2.0%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of mabl is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2541093 - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides efficient test automation for web applications and has good technical support services
The platform's most valuable features include its recorder, which allows users to create test cases with minimal effort, significantly simplifying the process. Vision AI enhances image recognition capabilities, improving the accuracy and efficiency of visual testing. The audit trail feature helps track changes and maintain compliance, which is particularly important in regulated industries. Smart fix automatically resolves issues, reducing manual intervention, while the self-healing feature ensures that test cases remain accurate and functional, even when system changes occur.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Insurance Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Functionize?
The product helps reduce overall costs by decreasing reliance on manual testers and speeding up testing cycles.
What needs improvement with Functionize?
The solution currently does not support mobile applications. It would significantly improve its versatility.
What is your primary use case for Functionize?
We use the product to transition customers from manual to automated testing, particularly for web applications. It involves reducing team sizes, accelerating testing strategies, and providing speci...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Salesforce, Mastercard, Google, HP Enterprise, Cisco, Farmers Insurance, The General
Arch Insurance Group, Internet Travel Solutions, CareerBuilder, LOB, Building Engines, MaestroQA, TeamLeader, Piece of Cake
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.