ACCELQ Automate vs Functionize comparison

ACCELQ and Functionize are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. ACCELQ is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0, while Functionize is ranked #16 with an average rating of 10.0. ACCELQ holds a 1.2% mindshare in TAt, compared to Functionize’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ACCELQ users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Functionize users who would recommend it.

ACCELQ Automate

Read 1 ACCELQ Automate review

867 Views
705 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Functionize

Read 1 Functionize review

941 Views
852 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ACCELQ Automate

Functionize

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ACCELQ Automate and Functionize based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

ACCELQ Automate

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

19th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Functionize

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

16th

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of ACCELQ Automate is 1.2%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Functionize is 1.9%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Provides good stability and a valuable object identification feature

We evaluated data testing for millions of records. As per architecture, it can efficiently run a few thousands of records. However, we couldn't implement it for millions of records. Thus, it works well for a small amount of data. We have 30 users for it in our organization and use it daily. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2541093

QA Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides efficient test automation for web applications and has good technical support services

The platform's most valuable features include its recorder, which allows users to create test cases with minimal effort, significantly simplifying the process. Vision AI enhances image recognition capabilities, improving the accuracy and efficiency of visual testing. The audit trail feature helps track changes and maintain compliance, which is particularly important in regulated industries. Smart fix automatically resolves issues, reducing manual intervention, while the self-healing feature ensures that test cases remain accurate and functional, even when system changes occur.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform contributes to faster test release cycles."

"The platform's most valuable features include its recorder, which allows users to create test cases with minimal effort, significantly simplifying the process."

Cons

"The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details."

"The solution currently does not support mobile applications. It would significantly improve its versatility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized."

"The product helps reduce overall costs by decreasing reliance on manual testers and speeding up testing cycles."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Healthcare Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACCELQ Automate?

The platform contributes to faster test release cycles.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ACCELQ Automate?

I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ACCELQ Automate?

The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details. Additionally, there could be a capability to automatically generate automation scripts extracting the user data fr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Functionize?

The product helps reduce overall costs by decreasing reliance on manual testers and speeding up testing cycles.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Functionize?

The solution currently does not support mobile applications. It would significantly improve its versatility.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Functionize?

We use the product to transition customers from manual to automated testing, particularly for web applications. It involves reducing team sizes, accelerating testing strategies, and providing speci...

See all answers

Comparisons

Katalon Studio vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 31% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 18% of the time

Testsigma vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 16% of the time

Eggplant Test vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 10% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 7% of the time

More ACCELQ Automate Competitors

Testim vs Functionize

Compared 34% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Functionize

Compared 27% of the time

mabl vs Functionize

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Functionize

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Functionize

Compared 5% of the time

More Functionize Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

October 2024

Download ACCELQ Automate product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

October 2024

Download Functionize product report

Learn More

ACCELQ

Functionize

Overview

The most powerful test automation tool for web, desktop, mainframes and more.

Functionize delivers an autonomous testing platform that incorporates AI and machine learning technologies to automate the painstaking software testing process.

Sample Customers

FISCHER, optanix, ERICSSON, BenifitMall, QuickPivot, DIGITALFUEL, westcreek

Salesforce, Mastercard, Google, HP Enterprise, Cisco, Farmers Insurance, The General

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

October 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.