ACCELQ Automate vs Eggplant Test comparison

ACCELQ and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. ACCELQ is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.7. ACCELQ holds a 1.2% mindshare in TAt, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ACCELQ users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

ACCELQ Automate

Read 1 ACCELQ Automate review

836 Views
680 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Read 17 Eggplant Test reviews

2,995 Views
1,658 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

ACCELQ Automate

Eggplant Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ACCELQ Automate and Eggplant Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

ACCELQ Automate

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (10th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of ACCELQ Automate is 1.2%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Eggplant Test is 3.6%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Provides good stability and a valuable object identification feature

We evaluated data testing for millions of records. As per architecture, it can efficiently run a few thousands of records. However, we couldn't implement it for millions of records. Thus, it works well for a small amount of data. We have 30 users for it in our organization and use it daily. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Tayyaba Noreen

Student at SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY

Empowers effective test automation with comprehensive platform coverage and scalability

There was no free trial in it. So, I studied it through a page that tells how it works. It will be good if a free trial is provided for users. Moreover, I would like to give some feedback on the installation process. There are other tools that are much easier to install and get started with. Eggplant could improve its installation process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform contributes to faster test release cycles."

"The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests."

"DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options."

"The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR."

"The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them."

"The solution is a stable one."

"We are able to now automate tests, which so far have been manual."

"GUI testing is the strength of the tool. The tool works as expected, and the support response from eggPlant, as a company, has been quick and substantial."

"Everything is happening on the layout or display that is used by the user. Eggplant prompts processes, like 'click here,' or 'look for this image.' Eggplant makes it possible for QA people and BAs, working in the actual display, to check if the software is providing the right images, the right text, and the right results. They don't have to go inside the code or to the TCP/IP layer. Everything is happening at the highest level."

More Eggplant Test pros

Cons

"The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details."

"In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing."

"Since there are very few customers in the Indian region, there is no training available, and it's challenging to find skilled talent."

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

"The solution would crash from time to time."

"The language is too specific; it is just for Eggplant."

"Eggplant Test should emphasize on improving its offering in non-Windows environments."

"Its performance and stability could be better."

"There was no free trial in it."

More Eggplant Test cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Healthcare Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACCELQ Automate?

The platform contributes to faster test release cycles.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ACCELQ Automate?

I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ACCELQ Automate?

The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details. Additionally, there could be a capability to automatically generate automation scripts extracting the user data fr...

See all answers

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Eggplant Manager?

The solution is a stable one.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

Eggplant Test is a bit expensive compared to its competitors.

See all answers

Comparisons

Katalon Studio vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 28% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 17% of the time

Testsigma vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 16% of the time

Functionize vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 11% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 7% of the time

More ACCELQ Automate Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 21% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 17% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 10% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs Eggplant Test

Compared 2% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

November 2024

Download ACCELQ Automate product report

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

December 2024

Download Eggplant Test product report

Also Known As

No data available

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Learn More

ACCELQ

Keysight Technologies

Overview

The most powerful test automation tool for web, desktop, mainframes and more.

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Sample Customers

FISCHER, optanix, ERICSSON, BenifitMall, QuickPivot, DIGITALFUEL, westcreek

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

November 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.