Polyspace Code Prover and GitGuardian Platform compete in code analysis and security management. GitGuardian Platform appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive security features and effective vulnerability prevention.
Features: Polyspace Code Prover offers static code analysis for detecting code issues, enhancing safety and reliability. Its support and pricing are also noted as valuable features. GitGuardian Platform provides advanced secret detection, security vulnerability prevention, and compliance features. Users recognize its feature set as more robust, enhancing its appeal.
Room for Improvement: Polyspace Code Prover could improve with better integration flexibility, faster analysis speeds, and more intuitive interfaces. GitGuardian Platform requires better alerting mechanisms, a simpler setup process, and enhanced customer service, as mixed reviews indicate areas for development.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Polyspace Code Prover is appreciated for smooth deployment and responsive support. GitGuardian Platform's cloud-based model is valued for easy installation, though its customer service receives mixed feedback, highlighting contrasting deployment experiences.
Pricing and ROI: Polyspace Code Prover is cost-effective, deemed to deliver satisfying ROI. GitGuardian Platform, despite higher setup costs, provides substantial ROI through effective data breach prevention. Its pricing aligns with its security offerings, making it a worthwhile investment.
GitGuardian helps organizations detect and fix vulnerabilities in source code at every step of the software development lifecycle. With GitGuardian’s policy engine, security teams can monitor and enforce rules across their VCS, DevOps tools, and infrastructure-as-code configurations.
Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by more than 500,000 developers and is the #1 app in the security category on the GitHub Marketplace. GitGuardian is also trusted by leading companies, including Instacart, Genesys, Orange, Iress, Beyond Identity, NOW: Pensions, and Stedi.
GitGuardian Platform includes automated secrets detection and remediation. By reducing the risks of secrets exposure across the SDLC, GitGuardian helps software-driven organizations strengthen their security posture and comply with frameworks and standards.
Its detection engine is trained against more than a billion public GitHub commits every year, and it covers 350+ types of secrets such as API keys, database connection strings, private keys, certificates, and more.
GitGuardian brings security and development teams together with automated remediation playbooks and collaboration features to resolve incidents fast and in full. By pulling developers closer to the remediation process, organizations can achieve higher incident closing rates and shorter fix times.
The platform integrates across the DevOps toolchain, including native support for continuously scanning VCS platforms like GitHub, Gitlab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket or CI/CD tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, Travis CI, GitLab pipelines, and many more. It also integrates with ticketing and messaging systems like Splunk, PagerDuty, Jira and Slack to support teams with their incident remediation workflows. GitGuardian is offered as a SaaS platform but can also be hosted on-premise for organizations operating in highly regulated industries or with strict data privacy requirements.
Polyspace Code Prover is a sound static analysis tool that proves the absence of overflow, divide-by-zero, out-of-bounds array access, and certain other run-time errors in C and C++ source code. It produces results without requiring program execution, code instrumentation, or test cases. Polyspace Code Prover uses semantic analysis and abstract interpretation based on formal methods to verify software interprocedural, control, and data flow behavior. You can use it on handwritten code, generated code, or a combination of the two. Each operation is color-coded to indicate whether it is free of run-time errors, proven to fail, unreachable, or unproven.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.