Polyspace Code Prover vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) comparison

MathWorks and Sonar are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. MathWorks is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.8, while Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. MathWorks holds a 1.1% mindshare in AS, compared to Sonar’s 25.6% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of MathWorks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Sonar users who would recommend it.

Polyspace Code Prover

Read 6 Polyspace Code Prover reviews

1,609 Views
1,026 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 114 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

36,750 Views
30,412 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Polyspace Code Prover

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 30, 2024

SonarQube Server and Polyspace Code Prover are competitive products in the code quality and analysis category. Although Polyspace Code Prover is known for its robust static analysis, SonarQube Server has an upper hand in adoption due to its flexibility and integration capabilities.

Features: SonarQube Server provides comprehensive code quality management and a wide integration network with its extensive plugin ecosystem, making it suitable for continuous code inspection across diverse environments. Polyspace Code Prover is distinctive for its advanced static analysis and strong dedication to safety and security-critical systems, which is essential in industries that prioritize safety and reliability.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube Server could enhance its security vulnerability identification features, streamline complex plugins, and improve licensing adaptability for modern CI/CD practices. Polyspace Code Prover might benefit from simplifying its setup process, expanding its integration options, and offering more cost-effective solutions for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube Server is built on an open-source platform, offering easy deployment and strong community support, which simplifies troubleshooting. Polyspace Code Prover, although supported by detailed documentation and professional services, may pose more complex deployment challenges, especially in large-scale enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube Server provides a cost-effective solution through its open-source option, reducing initial investment for organizations aiming for broad code quality oversight. Polyspace Code Prover involves higher setup costs, justified by its specialized features for safety and code verification, delivering more pronounced ROI in environments demanding rigorous code validation.

To learn more, read our detailed Polyspace Code Prover vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Polyspace Code Prover vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Polyspace Code Prover

Ranking in Application Security Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

114

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Polyspace Code Prover is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 25.6%, down from 27.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Aman Singla

Senior Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Easy to setup with reliable outputs and good reliability

It is easy to set up the solution. We can actually modify it using script also. It's pretty easy to link it with our in-house toolchain with the Polyspace configuration settings. If we have small amounts of data, it's quick and you can set it up within ten to 15 minutes. However, depending on the size of the data and the variables, it could take a while since you have to provide a range for all variables. If you have, for example, 500 variables, you'll be configuring a lot. However, the input extremes can be fed using an Excel file or some other format.

Read full review

Wang Dayong

Senior Software Engineering Manager at Hill

Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages

The product provides false reports sometimes. It also fails to understand the context of the code. It reports that a line of code has issues without considering its relation with the previous line. The product should improve the report quality. While it asks us to improve the code quality, it would be good if it also suggests how to improve the quality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product detects memory corruptions."

"The outputs are very reliable."

"When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts, and null pointer dereferences."

"Polyspace Code Prover is a very user-friendly tool."

"Polyspace Code Prover has made me realize it differs from other static code analysis tools because it runs the code. So it's quite distinct in that aspect."

"Can tweak rules and feed them into our build pipelines."

"The fact that the solution does security scanning is valuable."

"My focus is mainly on the DevOps pipeline side of things, and from my perspective, the ease of use and configuration is valuable. It is pretty straightforward to take a deployment pipeline or CI/CD pipeline and integrate SonarQube into it."

"It is a very good tool for analysis and security vulnerability checking."

"It is a very good tool for analysis despite its limitations."

"The code coverage feature is very good."

"The stability is good."

"All the features of the solution are quite good."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

Cons

"I'd like the data to be taken from any format."

"Automation could be a challenge."

"The tool has some stability issues."

"Using Code Prover on large applications crashes sometimes."

"One of the main disadvantages is the time it takes to initiate the first run."

"The product's pricing could be lower."

"SonarQube could improve by adding automatic creation of tasks after scanning and more support for the Czech language."

"The learning curve can be fairly steep at first, but then, it's not an entry-level type of application. It's not like an introduction to C programming. You should know not just C programming and how to make projects but also how to apply its findings to the bigger picture. I've had users who said that they wish it was easier to understand how to configure, but I don't know if that's doable because what it's doing is a very complicated thing. I don't know if it is possible to make a complicated thing trivially simple."

"You may need to purchase add-ons to get the useability you desire."

"Our developers have complained about the Quality Gates and the number of false positives that this product reports."

"Any suggestions for potential improvements may include bill of materials functionality."

"The software testing tool capability could improve. It does not always integrate well. You have to use a specific plugin and the plugin does not always go in Apple's applications."

"The solution is a bit lacking on the security side, in terms of finding and identifying vulnerabilities."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the paid version."

"SonarQube enterprise, I am not sure of the price but from what I understand they are charging a fee. It's is not clear if it is an annual fee or a one-off."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable."

"I use the full trial version of SonarQube."

"It is very expensive. Its price should be improved."

"My guess is that we have a yearly subscription. We use it quite extensively, so a monthly license wouldn't make sense. Yearly subscriptions are usually cheaper. In addition to the standard licensing fee, there is just the cost of running the hardware where it is hosted."

"SonarQube price is a little bit higher than Kiuwan's. Kiuwan also gives a little bit of flexibility in terms of pricing."

"Compared to similar solutions, SonarQube was more accessible to us and had more benefits, with regards to size of the code base and supported languages. Apart from the Enterprise licensing fee, there are no additional costs."

"Get the paid version which allows the customized dashboard and provides technical support."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

38%

Computer Software Company

12%

Transportation Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Polyspace Code Prover?

When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Polyspace Code Prover?

We use the paid version.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polyspace Code Prover?

I'm still trying to use constraints with range propagation, but I can't get it to work properly, and I haven't found any documentation. It require support. There could be an issue with range propag...

See all answers

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Comparisons

Coverity vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 28% of the time

Klocwork vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 18% of the time

CodeSonar vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 9% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 5% of the time

Veracode vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 3% of the time

More Polyspace Code Prover Competitors

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 14% of the time

Coverity vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 8% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Polyspace Code Prover

February 2025

Download Polyspace Code Prover product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

January 2025

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sonar

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

MathWorks

Sonar

Overview

Polyspace Code Prover is a sound static analysis tool that proves the absence of overflow, divide-by-zero, out-of-bounds array access, and certain other run-time errors in C and C++ source code. It produces results without requiring program execution, code instrumentation, or test cases. Polyspace Code Prover uses semantic analysis and abstract interpretation based on formal methods to verify software interprocedural, control, and data flow behavior. You can use it on handwritten code, generated code, or a combination of the two. Each operation is color-coded to indicate whether it is free of run-time errors, proven to fail, unreachable, or unproven.

MathWorks

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

Sample Customers

Alenia Aermacchi, CSEE Transport, Delphi Diesel Systems, EADS, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Korean Air, KOSTAL, Miracor, NASA Ames Research Center

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Polyspace Code Prover vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

January 2025

Free Report: Polyspace Code Prover vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Find out what your peers are saying about Polyspace Code Prover vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Polyspace Code Prover vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.