GitHub Actions vs JFrog Pipeline comparison

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a good product that offers stability and performance."

"I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to just 8 to 10 minutes through these optimizations."

"The product's most beneficial feature is the ability to create workflows within the solution."

"GitHub Actions is valuable for its ease of use and integration."

"The main benefit is collaboration. It allows us to easily collaborate with other developers, regardless of location. For example, we can collaborate with both our African and German colleagues seamlessly. It's platform-agnostic, so it is flexible and not tied to any OS, so we can work on Linux, Windows, web, and even Oracle applications. It's flexible, reliable, and overall an excellent tool for our needs."

"It is a very stable solution as we have not faced any issues."

"Creating workflows in YAML format is straightforward and easy to comprehend. This includes both understanding and writing workflows. Additionally, the downloading aspect for third-party instances can also be easily done. It's worth noting that vulnerability analysis and similar tasks should be part of our automation through data workflows. Furthermore, we can break down our processes step by step, starting from building, then moving on to analysis, testing, and finally deploying in production and the clear environment. All of these tasks can be efficiently managed within this platform."

"It offers numerous built-in features for pipeline management, release management, and even work item tracking on boards, which makes it a versatile tool that seamlessly integrates with hardware and facilitates optimization."

"Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point with the additional pipelines making it more interesting to see what is happening across your development process in a single pane of glass."

"The platform has some amazing features and the integration option makes it very simple to plug with any of our favorite tools."

"There is a part that detects outdated libraries. If that feature could be more intuitive and informative, that would be nice."

"The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited."

"My company would want to see some AI features in the tool as it can add value to the product."

"The UI could be better."

"In terms of improvements, I think better logging for debugging purposes would be helpful, especially for complex workflows."

"The only issue I have faced is with authorization, particularly when configuring the GitHub token correctly."

"Improvements could be made in terms of time-saving capabilities and resolving potential complexities in centralized workflows."

"The primary area for improvement I see is in artifact management, especially for saving screenshots or videos from failed tests or data-driven actions. Currently, the configuration for saving these artifacts is complex."

"They could work on reducing the number of permissions required while using Bitbucket."

"The tool's price is okay and reasonable."

"For our basic usage, we didn't have to pay."

"Price-wise, GitHub Actions is okay. If I want to use the product's advanced features, then I need to pay the licensing charges for the solution."

"Regarding cost, as an enterprise, we negotiate our license and expenses, so I can't provide a specific rating for that."

"The product is slightly more expensive than some alternatives."

"It's low-priced. Not high, but definitely low."

"It is free and open platform, so I would rate it 1 out of 10."

"The pricing is the cheapest compared to the other platforms out there."