Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitHub Actions vs SemaphoreCI comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Actions
Ranking in Build Automation
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SemaphoreCI
Ranking in Build Automation
27th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of GitHub Actions is 10.1%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SemaphoreCI is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

MohamedMostafa1 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 27, 2024
Handles scalability well, automatically managing execution infrastructure without requiring additional configurationsThe automation feature of GitHub Actions is
We mainly use GitHub Actions for our CI/CD process. Whenever there's a change in our source code, we integrate and configure it using GitHub Actions to ensure code quality before merging it into our main branch I find the automation feature of GitHub Actions most valuable for our building…
Use SemaphoreCI?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is free and open platform, so I would rate it 1 out of 10."
"Regarding cost, as an enterprise, we negotiate our license and expenses, so I can't provide a specific rating for that."
"Price-wise, GitHub Actions is okay. If I want to use the product's advanced features, then I need to pay the licensing charges for the solution."
"The tool's price is okay and reasonable."
"It's low-priced. Not high, but definitely low."
"For our basic usage, we didn't have to pay."
"The product is slightly more expensive than some alternatives."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Actions?
I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to j...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Actions?
The product is slightly more expensive than some alternatives, like Bitbucket, but the additional cost is minimal.
What needs improvement with GitHub Actions?
There could be more integration options with different platforms.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Dribble, Art Sy, 500px, General Assembly, CrunchBase, Lexmark
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Google, Jenkins and others in Build Automation. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.