GNU Make vs TeamCity comparison

GNU and JetBrains are both solutions in the Build Automation category. GNU is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0, while JetBrains is ranked #10 with an average rating of 6.0. GNU holds a 0.6% mindshare in BA, compared to JetBrains’s 6.8% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of GNU users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

GNU Make

Read 6 GNU Make reviews

218 Views
186 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

TeamCity

Read 28 TeamCity reviews

2,643 Views
2,335 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

GNU Make

TeamCity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GNU Make and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed GNU Make vs. TeamCity Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

GNU Make vs. TeamCity

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,690 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

GNU Make

Ranking in Build Automation

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TeamCity

Ranking in Build Automation

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of GNU Make is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamCity is 6.8%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

reviewer2561757

Software at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Oct 24, 2024

Enhances productivity with efficient dependency handling and a straightforward setup

GNU Make is used as a build system tool. Most people don't use GNU Make directly but utilize other systems like CMake to generate Make files, which are then run by GNU Make. This is common for tasks like compiling C++ code. In the industry, AI developers, for example, use GNU Make in their work…

Read full review

Omakoji Idakwoji

Software Engineer at Home Depot

Jul 25, 2022

Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans

We use it for running unit tests for merge requests on github. We also use it to build executable artifacts and also for running security scans Time to deployment has been reduced. It has helped in preventing us from deploying breaking changes into production. If the pipelines are configured…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Makefiles are extremely easy to work with using any preferred editor. GNU Make can be run directly from the terminal, not requiring any time wasted on clicking."

"Setup is extremely straightforward."

"Full-featured syntax allows building strategies as simple or as complex as one wishes, and declarative approach fits the task really well. Wide adoption also means that everybody knows what GNU Make is and how to use it."

"I have not encountered any scalability issues with GNU Make. It is as scalable as the project's structure is, and then some."

"The initial setup of GNU Make is straightforward."

"GNU Make is such an essential tool that it is almost impossible to imagine working without it. Not having it, developers would probably have to resort to doing everything manually or via shell scripts."

"VCS Trigger: Provides excellent source control support."

"We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted."

"TeamCity's GUI is nice."

"It provides repeatable CI/CD throughout our company with lots of feedback on failures and successes to the intended audiences via email and Slack."

"Time to deployment has been reduced in situations where we want to deploy to production or deploy breaking changes."

"I have not yet implemented the remote build feature, but this will be a big plus. We want to be able to build legacy products on a build agent without developers needing to have obsolete tool sets installed on their local PC."

"One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies."

"The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine."

More TeamCity pros

Cons

"GNU Make does not provide traditional customer support."

"GNU Make requires using the Tab symbol as the first symbol of command line for execution. In some text editors this can be problematic, as they automatically insert spaces instead of tabs."

"Vanilla GNU Make does not support any kind of colored output. A wrapper named colormake exists to work around this, but native (opt-in) support would be welcome."

"Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted."

"It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there."

"REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings."

"Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone) to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly."

"I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does."

"We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US."

"I would like to see an improvement where TeamCity alerts us via email or another medium if there are discrepancies between the code in the staging environment and what has been deployed to production, such as missing updates."

"The integration between other solutions and TeamCity could be smoother."

More TeamCity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no price for this product. No licensing. It’s open-source."

"GNU Make is free and open source software."

"Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."

"The licensing is on an annual basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GNU Make?

GNU Make is a free solution that comes with Linux, which positively impacts operational costs by eliminating licensing fees.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GNU Make?

I am not familiar enough with it to suggest any specific new features or areas for improvement. It occupies its niche well.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GNU Make?

See all answers

What do you like most about TeamCity?

One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamCity?

Compared to new technologies, TeamCity is more expensive and is an older tool compared to tools like GitLab.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamCity?

TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Jenkins vs GNU Make

Compared 100% of the time

More GNU Make Competitors

GitLab vs TeamCity

Compared 38% of the time

GitHub Actions vs TeamCity

Compared 16% of the time

CircleCI vs TeamCity

Compared 13% of the time

Harness vs TeamCity

Compared 10% of the time

Tekton vs TeamCity

Compared 8% of the time

More TeamCity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

October 2024

Download GNU Make product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamCity

October 2024

Download TeamCity product report

Learn More

GNU

JetBrains

Overview

Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia

Buyer's Guide

GNU Make vs. TeamCity

October 2024

Free Report: GNU Make vs. TeamCity

Find out what your peers are saying about GNU Make vs. TeamCity and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GNU Make vs. TeamCity report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.