Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Chrome Enterprise vs Windows Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 7, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Adopting Google Chrome Enterprise cuts costs by converting existing devices to Chromebooks, saving on infrastructure and IT support.
Sentiment score
4.9
Windows Server enhances efficiency and stability, provides competitive advantage and cost savings through virtualization, making it a worthwhile investment.
We're very competitive commercially and technically because of it.
We've seen value in Windows Server because the systems work smoothly without any problems.
Windows Server offers excellent value for money, particularly when compared to alternatives.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.3
Google Chrome Enterprise offers extensive documentation and prompt support but struggles with delays and direct contact challenges.
Sentiment score
6.1
Microsoft's customer service is generally good, but response times and expertise vary by region and support agreements.
The online support often redirects us to FAQs instead of connecting to a real person.
There could be more detailed guidance on new installations like Google Authenticator, as the process is often vague and lacks fine-tuned information.
Our in-house team can also solve most issues.
If you go through a partner who sells or supports Windows, the support could be around seven out of ten, because Windows relies on these partners for assistance.
Microsoft's technical support for Windows Server has been lacking, with rare responses even with premium support.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Google Chrome Enterprise efficiently scales with user growth, supporting diverse needs and excelling in remote management and cloud environments.
Sentiment score
8.3
Windows Server is scalable, supporting medium to large enterprises, but complexity arises with growth, especially in advanced environments.
Firefox is slightly more efficient as it uses less memory.
I rate its scalability a ten out of ten.
It's definitely scalable.
The solution is used extensively in our organization, and we have plans to increase the usage.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Google Chrome Enterprise is praised for its stability and reliability, receiving high ratings despite being resource-intensive on lower-end processors.
Sentiment score
7.9
Users praise Windows Server's stability and performance, noting improvements, minimal crashes, and reliability for various applications despite occasional update issues.
Google Chrome Enterprise is stable, and I haven't faced any stability problems.
We have experienced no blue screens or crashes and often achieved an uptime of 2,000 to 3,000 days without any issues whatsoever.
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
The tool is stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Google Chrome Enterprise needs better performance, enhanced features, improved user experience, and AI integration to satisfy user demands.
Windows Server needs better integration, security, stability, performance, pricing, support, compatibility, and seamless cloud integration improvements.
If we have a laptop with basic configuration, it eats up a lot of RAM and slows down the system.
This causes hesitation in installing them due to concerns about hidden costs and inadequate information.
The solution should improve its stability.
From a security perspective, sometimes, malware attacks and hackers take advantage of the tool's vulnerabilities.
Deploying antivirus and firewall software on the server is advisable, but having an external firewall adds an extra layer of security.
 

Setup Cost

Google Chrome Enterprise provides cost-effective, flexible pricing with discounts in educational sectors and valued security features.
Enterprise buyers find Windows Server licensing costly and complex, often preferring simpler, more affordable alternatives like Linux.
It's a bit on the higher side, but we prefer to stick with it because of the security, ease of maintenance, and the company's reputation.
It is quite expensive.
Previously, a Windows Server with two processors cost around two 154 euros annually, but now it is estimated to be around 3,000 to 4,000 euros for the same configuration.
On a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I rate it ten out of ten.
 

Valuable Features

Google Chrome Enterprise offers user-friendly security, extensive extensions, and cloud integration, making it ideal for organizational use.
Windows Server is user-friendly and integrates seamlessly, offering stability, performance, scalability, and robust security for enterprise applications.
The security it offers is an advantage, which is crucial for us due to HIPAA compliance concerns.
Google Chrome Enterprise is my preferred browser over Firefox and Microsoft Edge.
Windows Server is a stable and scalable solution.
The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that every Microsoft product is scalable, flexible, secure, and available on a certain budget.
The IP directory is the most valuable feature.
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Chrome Enterprise
Ranking in Operating Systems (OS) for Business
12th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Browsers (1st)
Windows Server
Ranking in Operating Systems (OS) for Business
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
188
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Operating Systems (OS) for Business category, the mindshare of Google Chrome Enterprise is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Server is 9.0%, up from 8.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Operating Systems (OS) for Business
 

Featured Reviews

Harsha Ramamurthy - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides flexibility for remote work and offers good performance
My company has a product servicing team of 12 people, consisting of network engineers who call themselves network support, and the other teams in my company refer to them as the setup servicing team. Though not all of them manage Google, some of them do it when required. In terms of the manageability benefits offered by the product to my company's team, I would say that there was not much of a learning curve involved when we migrated from Microsoft to Google around two years ago, and it was pretty easy to integrate. I have not utilized Google Chrome's flexibility for remote work. The solution has some good points in terms of scalability and ease of use. However, my company doesn't like the UX component of the product, and it is also one of the reasons why we miss Microsoft Teams. I can recommend the product to others after considering their needs. If a user has more money to invest, they should choose Microsoft. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
NirajSingh - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly platform streamlining client connectivity
We are using Windows Server to connect our client software. We use it to access client systems and work on SQL databases Rather than purchasing and setting up infrastructure, we are using Windows Server, which obviously saves some costs. Windows Server is fulfilling our daily work-life purposes.…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
848,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Chrome Enterprise?
The solution's most valuable feature is its browser, which offers good performance.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Chrome Enterprise?
It's a bit on the higher side, but we prefer to stick with it because of the security, ease of maintenance, and the company's reputation.
What needs improvement with Google Chrome Enterprise?
It's a bit bulky. If we have a laptop with basic configuration, it eats up a lot of RAM and slows down the system.
What needs improvement with Windows Server?
I think there is room for improvement in the stability of older versions. Additionally, Windows Server could be more power-efficient, especially for individuals doing labs or studies on personal co...
What is your primary use case for Windows Server?
Windows Server ( /products/windows-server-reviews ) is the operating system we run on our servers. We use it in the IT department, primarily as the OS for our servers.
 

Also Known As

Chrome Enterprise
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Netflix, Coca Cola, Pinterest, Toyota, Vertex, LafargeHolcim, MedXM, DOT Comm, Whirlpool
Rakuten, Rackspace, Tyco
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Chrome Enterprise vs. Windows Server and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
848,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.