Google Security Operations vs Wazuh comparison

Google Security Operations

Read 46 Wazuh reviews

23,303 Views
14,680 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Google Security Operations and Wazuh compete in cybersecurity solutions, with Google excelling in pricing and support while Wazuh leads in features and perceived value.

Features: Google Security Operations provides advanced threat detection, integrated response capabilities, and comprehensive monitoring with its cloud-native infrastructure. Wazuh offers open-source security analytics, host intrusion detection, and regulatory compliance, making it versatile and cost-effective. Google has stronger integration with other Google services, while Wazuh is notable for flexibility and extensibility.

Room for Improvement: Google Security Operations could improve by expanding its offering beyond Google Cloud to draw a wider user base, enhancing multi-platform compatibility, and providing more open-source tools. Wazuh would benefit from more user-friendly deployment processes, enhanced out-of-the-box support options to reduce reliance on technical expertise, and improved UI design for a better user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Security Operations integrates seamlessly within Google Cloud, easing deployment and offering reliable customer service. Wazuh, known for its open-source nature, allows for greater customization but may require more technical expertise during deployment. It benefits from community-driven support, offering in-depth solutions through shared user experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Google Security Operations provides scalable pricing, appealing to enterprises with consolidated billing strategies, with ROI gained through enhanced security and streamlined operations. Wazuh, being open-source, minimizes setup costs, offering significant savings, especially for smaller organizations or those with existing tech infrastructure. Google's cost may be justified by its system integration, while Wazuh provides cost-efficiency for scalable security on a budget.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Security Operations vs. Wazuh Report (Updated: March 2025).

Google Security Operations vs. Wazuh

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Security Operations

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

32nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (16th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (10th)

Wazuh

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

2nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (1st), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Google Security Operations is 0.5%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wazuh is 14.3%, down from 14.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2203269

Cloud Senior lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Real-time threat detection and alarm management have improved security operations

Google SecOps is extremely useful for threat detection and hunting. It provides a detailed pipeline for detection and is beneficial for real-time threat monitoring when integrated with Mandiant. The tool's integration capabilities are effective, and it helps in managing alarms for normal threats efficiently. Overall, Google SecOps is a very useful service for security operations.

Read full review

Sandip_Patel

Student at Dakota State University

Evaluating robust file monitoring with insights for community support improvements

Wazuh's most valuable features include file monitoring and compliance reporting, which do not require excessive costs. These aspects are vital as they provide alerts for changes and facilitate the monitoring of compliance. The platform is also relatively easy to set up and operate. Reports are straightforward to extract and prove useful for compliance requirements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, Google SecOps is a very useful service for security operations."

"The most valuable feature of Siemplify is the playbooks that can be created."

"The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user interface is generally straightforward, although recent changes may require some adjustment and Siemplify's integrations and capabilities offer potential support for various compliance requirements."

"Without hyperbole, I have never, in my entire career, encountered a vendor or a vendor community as awesome as Siemplify. Siemplify and the Siemplify Community quite literally made it possible for our SOC to increase almost five-fold in our number of clients and number of analysts and to go from a Monday to Friday 9-5 shop to a 24/7 shop all in the span of under a year and a half and all while continually adding capabilities and improving the services we offer to our clients."

"Google SecOps is extremely useful for threat detection and hunting."

"The product is easy to customize."

"It's very easy to integrate Wazuh with other environments, cloud applications, and on-prem applications. So, the advantage is that it's easy to implement and integrate with other solutions."

"It is a stable solution."

"The solution is easy to maintain."

"Wazuh automatically scans the host for CIS benchmarks for the latest updates and vulnerabilities and gives a host score. It provides a percentage of perceived risk due to of non patches or any missing patches on that work."

"I like Wazuh because it is a lot like ELK, which I was already comfortable with, so I didn't have to learn from scratch."

"Regarding Wazuh, I find the SCA (Security Configuration Assessment) features most valuable. It's crucial for asset management and inventory, allowing us to monitorendpoints and servers' changes easily. This is particularly important for my customers, who aren't heavily focused on incident response but rely on asset management and inventories. Wazuh's compliance management features are very supportive, especially in regions like the Americas and Europe. However, it's less effective in the ANZ (Australia and New Zealand) region since Wazuh doesn't cater to the specific compliance standards there, such as those required in Australia. I appreciate that Wazuh fully complies with PCI DSS and GDPR standards, allowing us to generate necessary reports."

"Some of the strengths of Wazuh that stand out for us include its scalability when deployed on Azure, its open-source nature, which allows for customization based on our needs, and its compatibility with various security solutions like threat intelligence platforms."

More Wazuh pros

Cons

"The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions."

"We often encounter minor issues that could be improved, but we maintain communication with the developers and submit feature requests. Recently, I requested enhancements such as improved search functionality within playbooks and expanded options for exporting case data."

"I'm inclined to say that I'd love to see some Machine Learning capabilities integrated into the platform, however, I just attended a demo this morning where Siemplify gave a sneak peek into some Machine Learning capabilities that they are currently developing and have roadmapped for release soon."

"The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions."

"Building the playbooks could be easier and the integration could improve. It is a difficult process, such as what API connections need to be made."

"The support channel is not optimal, and extensive research is required on our part to implement Wazuh effectively."

"Alerts should be specific rather than repeatedly triggered by integrating multiple factors. This issue needs improvement to create a more efficient alert system."

"Wazuh doesn't cover sources of events as well as Splunk. You can integrate Splunk with many sources of events, but it's a painful process to take care of some sources of events with Wazuh."

"Scalability is a constraint in the on-prem version of Wazuh in terms of the volume of logs we can manage."

"We would like to see more improvements on the cloud."

"Wazuh needs more security and features, particularly visualization features and a health monitor."

"It would be better if they had a vulnerability assessment plug-in like the one AlienVault has. In the next release, I would like to have an app with an alerting mechanism."

"A more structured approach, perhaps with modular UI components, to facilitate easier integration and navigation within the Wazuh platform for custom integrations would be beneficial."

More Wazuh cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Wazuh is free and open source."

"It is an open-source product."

"Wazuh is totally free and open source. There are no licensing costs, only support costs if you need them."

"Wazuh is an open-source tool, which means it is freely available for use."

"The product price is neither too high nor too low."

"Wazuh is open-source, but you must consider the total cost of ownership. It may be free to acquire, but you spend a lot of time and effort supporting the product and getting it to a point where it's useful."

"Wazuh is a cheaply priced product."

"Wazuh is not an expensive solution."

More Wazuh pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Retailer

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Siemplify?

The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user inter...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Siemplify?

The pricing for Google SecOps and Microsoft Sentinel is almost the same, with no significant differences.

What needs improvement with Siemplify?

The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions. Google SecOps reports could be more detailed, similar to the comprehensive descriptions provided by Microso...

What do you like most about Wazuh?

Integrates with various open-source and paid products, allowing for flexibility in customization based on use cases.

What needs improvement with Wazuh?

There is room for improvement by integrating more AI into Wazuh. It requires constant nurturing, as I have to provide it with code and specific requirements. This maintenance can be quite labor-int...

What is your primary use case for Wazuh?

We use Wazuh as a SIEM solution because it is open source, highly customizable, and continually expanding. Our clients can request various solutions for their issues, which Wazuh is able to address.

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Google Security Operations

Comparisons

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Security Operations

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Google Security Operations

Compared 16% of the time

Google Chronicle Suite vs Google Security Operations

Compared 15% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Google Security Operations

Compared 11% of the time

More Google Security Operations Competitors

Security Onion vs Wazuh

Compared 15% of the time

Elastic Stack vs Wazuh

Compared 13% of the time

AlienVault OSSIM vs Wazuh

Compared 8% of the time

Graylog vs Wazuh

Compared 7% of the time

Elastic Security vs Wazuh

Compared 5% of the time

More Wazuh Competitors

Product Reports

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

April 2025

Download Google Security Operations product report

Download Wazuh product report

March 2025

Also Known As

Siemplify ThreatNexus

No data available

Overview

Google Security Operations provides advanced threat detection and response capabilities. Tailored for cybersecurity professionals, it integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure, offering a proactive approach to managing security challenges.

Designed for enterprises requiring robust threat management, Google Security Operations harnesses the power of Google's infrastructure to deliver comprehensive insights into potential vulnerabilities and attack vectors. Leveraging AI and machine learning, users benefit from enhanced accuracy and speed in identifying threats, making it a crucial tool in maintaining cybersecurity resilience. Its adaptability allows businesses to customize security protocols, ensuring alignment with specific security strategies.

What are the most crucial features of Google Security Operations?

Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify potential threats quickly.
Automated Response: Streamlines response measures to mitigate risks efficiently.
Scalability: Designed to grow with the security demands of an organization.
Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with existing security tools and platforms.

What benefits do users gain from Google Security Operations?

Improved Security Posture: Strengthens defenses against emerging threats.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for extensive manual monitoring efforts.
Enhanced Decision Making: Provides detailed insights for informed security strategies.
Operational Efficiency: Increases the effectiveness of cybersecurity teams.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Google Security Operations is implemented to address specific regulatory and compliance requirements. Its adaptive features support cybersecurity frameworks, ensuring data protection and risk management standards are met effectively.

Google

Wazuh is an enterprise-ready platform used for security monitoring. It is a free and open-source platform that is used for threat detection, incident response and compliance, and integrity monitoring. Wazuh is capable of protecting workloads across virtualized, on-premises, containerized, and cloud-based environments.

It consists of an endpoint security agent and a management server. Additionally, Wazuh is fully integrated with the Elastic Stack, allowing users the ability to navigate through security alerts via a data visualization tool.

Wazuh’s agent can run on many different platforms, and is lightweight. It can successfully perform the tasks needed to detect threats in order to trigger responses automatically.
Wazuh manages the agents, can analyze agent data, and can scale horizontally.
Elastic Stack is where alerts are indexed and stored.

Wazuh Capabilities

Some of Wazuh’s most notable capabilities include:

Intrusion detection: Wazuh’s agents can detect hidden files, cloaked processes, or unregistered network listeners, as well as inconsistencies in system call responses. Wazuh’s server component uses a signature-based approach to intrusion detection, using its regular expression engine to analyze collected log data and look for indicators of compromise.
Log data analysis: Wazuh can read operating system and application logs, and securely forward them to a central manager for rule-based analysis and storage.
Integrity monitoring: File integrity monitoring can help identify changes in content, ownership, permissions, and attribute of files. Wazuh’s file integrity monitoring can be used in conjunction with threat intelligence.
Vulnerability detection: Wazuh agents can identify well-known vulnerable software so you can see where your weak spots are and take action before an attack can exploit them.
Configuration assessment: System and application configurations are monitored to make sure they are compliant with security policies. Periodic scans are used to detect applications that are known to be vulnerable, insecurely configured, or unpatched.
Incident response: Wazuh responds actively when active threats need to be addressed. It can perform countermeasures like blocking access to a system when a threat source is identified.
Regulatory compliance: Wazuh includes the security controls required to be compliant with industry regulations and standards.
Cloud security: Wazuh’s light-weight and multi-platform agents are commonly used to monitor cloud environments at the instance level. In addition, Wazuh helps monitor cloud infrastructure at an API level.
Security for containers: With Wazuh, you have increased security visibility into hosts and containers, allowing for easier detection of threats, anomalies, and vulnerabilities.

Wazuh Benefits

Some of the most valued benefits of Wazuh include:

No vendor lock-in
No license costs
Uses lightweight, multi-platform agents
Free community support

Wazuh Offers

Annual support and maintenance
Assistance with deployment and configuration
Training and instructional hands-on courses

Reviews From Real Users

"It's very easy to integrate Wazuh with other environments, cloud applications, and on-prem applications. So, the advantage is that it's easy to implement and integrate with other solutions." - Robert C., IT Security Consultant at Microlan Kenya Limited

“The MITRE ATT&CK correlation is most valuable.” - Chief Information Security Officer at a financial services firm

Sample Customers

FedEx Mondelez Intenrational Check Point Trustwave Atos Cyberint Bae Systems Crowe Longwall Security Telefonica Nordea HCL

Information Not Available