Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR comparison

Google and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Google is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.7, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. Google holds a 1.1% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Splunk’s 9.1% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
Google Security Operations
Read 3 Google Security Operations reviews
  • 1,047 Views
  • 611 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Splunk SOAR
Read 43 Splunk SOAR reviews
  • 5,755 Views
  • 3,400 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 29, 2024

Google Security Operations and Splunk SOAR are leading contenders in cybersecurity, focusing on security information and event management tools. Google Security Operations holds an advantage with better integration and scalability, while Splunk SOAR shines in automation capabilities, enhancing security posture.

Features: Google Security Operations offers seamless integration with Google Cloud services, strong threat intelligence, and scalability benefits. Splunk SOAR provides comprehensive automation, advanced orchestration functionalities, and efficient incident response mechanisms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Security Operations facilitates straightforward cloud-based deployment, making it user-friendly in cloud environments. Splunk SOAR presents flexible deployment options tailored to diverse environments, though its extensive customization offers complexity. Google's deployment process is more streamlined, while Splunk allows intricate configuration to suit specific infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Google Security Operations often incurs lower initial setup costs due to its cloud-native framework, reducing infrastructure expenditures. Splunk SOAR may demand higher initial investment because of its feature-rich platform but promises significant ROI by minimizing manual tasks through automation. Google's pricing is cost-efficient, whereas Splunk justifies higher costs with long-term automation benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 814,485 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Security Operations
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
16th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Splunk SOAR
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Google Security Operations is 1.1%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk SOAR is 9.1%, down from 9.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
 

Featured Reviews

CR
Apr 26, 2023
Great for reporting and ticketing for SOC MxDR client environments and has a great, supportive community
There are so many incredible features in the Chronicle SOAR platform that it's difficult to narrow down the list, however, if I had to choose, I would say that the most valuable features are the playbook builder and the integrations. The playbook builder allows us to establish workflows for the various case types that our analysts encounter within the SOC. These can be as granular or as high level as they need to be depending upon our business objectives and alert priorities. In turn, the tremendous number of integrations in the marketplace and the IDE (to custom-develop new integrations) are what make the playbooks as powerful as they are. Together, the integrations and playbooks make it simple to integrate powerful new capabilities and workflows.
Read full review
Ryan Plas - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 12, 2024
Offers playbook automation that helps reduce the manual and tedious work for users
When it comes to Splunk SOAR's ability to provide end-to-end visibility into our company's cloud-native environment, I would say that we are not using the cloud portions of it. I don't know if that's super relevant to what we are doing in our organization. I am 100 percent sure that Splunk SOAR helped reduce your mean time to resolve, but I don't have any metrics on hand but I know it has dramatically decreased. The tool has helped with the business resilience part. I think having it as a platform has been a solid portion of the product that we offer to people. Spunk SOAR has definitely saved my time in alert triage. When some of the tedious enrichment and lookup stuff happens, the analyst doesn't have to deal with such areas, and they can just jump in and see relevant data all in one pane of glass, which has been super helpful for speeding things up. The unified platform helps consolidate networking, security, and IT observability tools. The consolidation of tools impacts our organization as it just helps focus the SOC analyst on a single unified place to find information. It helps keep things streamlined and regular so they know where to look for certain stuff they want. It really helps people with training. It is a really easy tool to onboard people into because everything is right there in the product itself. The product is really great. I would love to see more SOAR innovation going into the tool, especially the on-premises version since it is what we use in our company. I feel the tool needs to encourage continuous improvements, but as a product itself, my company is really happy with the solution. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Without hyperbole, I have never, in my entire career, encountered a vendor or a vendor community as awesome as Siemplify. Siemplify and the Siemplify Community quite literally made it possible for our SOC to increase almost five-fold in our number of clients and number of analysts and to go from a Monday to Friday 9-5 shop to a 24/7 shop all in the span of under a year and a half and all while continually adding capabilities and improving the services we offer to our clients."
"The most valuable feature of Siemplify is the playbooks that can be created."
"The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user interface is generally straightforward, although recent changes may require some adjustment and Siemplify's integrations and capabilities offer potential support for various compliance requirements."
"The most valuable feature is the API connector, depending on how it's formatted and who made the actual app offering for it. The REST API is my favorite component. It's very easy to use. The filters are also really valuable. Those are the two primary features but I enjoy using the rest of it."
"The customization continues to be excellent."
"We are not a 24/7 SOC, so the most valuable feature of Splunk SOAR is the auto-response to threats when we are not in the office and the notifications that it sends to the on-call engineer."
"The most valuable features of Splunk SOAR are the easy integration with other solutions, including other Splunk solutions. The most important playbooks we need on the market come already on the Frontend. However, nowadays, Splunk changed its name, it's not Frontend anymore, it's Splunk Store. This is a very strong point."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk SOAR that stands out is it has a great SOAR. The automation and orchestration module is highly mature. A lot of use cases are on user entity and behavioral analytics (UEBA), which is artificial intelligence and machine learning-based (AIML)."
"It has definitely saved a decent amount of time for our analysts so they can focus on other tasks."
"Our customers find it easy to conduct searches and consider it an excellent content management system."
"The best feature is the integration and the custom Python code that we can write. Splunk SOAR provides us with both of these capabilities, allowing us to integrate different security solutions with Splunk SOAR and take remediation actions directly on those security tools."
More Splunk SOAR pros
 

Cons

"We often encounter minor issues that could be improved, but we maintain communication with the developers and submit feature requests. Recently, I requested enhancements such as improved search functionality within playbooks and expanded options for exporting case data."
"I'm inclined to say that I'd love to see some Machine Learning capabilities integrated into the platform, however, I just attended a demo this morning where Siemplify gave a sneak peek into some Machine Learning capabilities that they are currently developing and have roadmapped for release soon."
"Building the playbooks could be easier and the integration could improve. It is a difficult process, such as what API connections need to be made."
"It would be ideal if we could automate processes even more."
"In my opinion, the focus should be on improving its simplicity, specifically the interface, and configuration."
"have put a number of ideas on the ideas.splunk.com site for feature requests for the Splunk SOAR product. I posted one of them about three years ago, which finally got implemented in the latest release that just got announced, so the time to implement new features and things like that is a little bit concerning."
"The UI can be more customizable for the clients."
"SOAR is probably the most unreliable product Splunk has and that's because most of it is content driven from what you put into it. There are certain parts of it that have a little bit of difficulty at volume too. It's always changing. There is new stuff coming out for it that's going to make it a little bit better, but it does have some drawbacks."
"Various aspects of the playbook development process itself can be optimized."
"There is a lot of room for improvement with the UI."
"The tool's response is slower because it has to search through a huge dataset, which can be improved for latency."
More Splunk SOAR cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The cost is high and the licensing is on an annual basis."
"Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all the functions and tie together the data. It's the perfect tool for our needs."
"The tool is not cheap."
"Splunk SOAR is more expensive compared to other options for SOAR."
"I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."
"I found the price of Splunk SOAR to be good."
"The licensing cost is reasonable."
"It's very overpriced because it is based on the number of users. There is no bulk licensing."
More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
814,485 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Educational Organization
7%
Retailer
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Siemplify?
The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user inter...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Siemplify?
We often encounter minor issues that could be improved, but we maintain communication with the developers and submit feature requests. Recently, I requested enhancements such as improved search fun...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Siemplify?
Siemplify has streamlined various tasks such as configuring playbooks, integrations, and running reports. It helps automate security incident response processes through configuration setup and prov...
See all answers
What do you like most about Splunk Phantom?
Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?
I rate Splunk SOAR two out of 10 for affordability. Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?
The dashboard could be improved and some other features. SOAR should integrate network capabilities, allowing us to also monitor the WLAN network. Splunk is also expensive and difficult for beginne...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Google Security Operations Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Google Security Operations
Compared 30% of the time
Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Security Operations Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Security Operations
Compared 14% of the time
Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Google Security Operations Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Google Security Operations
Compared 13% of the time
More Google Security Operations Competitors
Cortex XSIAM vs Splunk SOAR Logo
Cortex XSIAM vs Splunk SOAR
Compared 25% of the time
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR
Compared 21% of the time
ServiceNow Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR
Compared 8% of the time
Torq vs Splunk SOAR Logo
Torq vs Splunk SOAR
Compared 7% of the time
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Splunk SOAR Logo
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Splunk SOAR
Compared 1% of the time
More Splunk SOAR Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
September 2024
Google Security Operations reportDownload Google Security Operations product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk SOAR
October 2024
Splunk SOAR reportDownload Splunk SOAR product report
 

Also Known As

Siemplify ThreatNexus
Phantom
 

Learn More

Google
Splunk
 

Overview

Google Security Operations provides advanced threat detection and response capabilities. Tailored for cybersecurity professionals, it integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure, offering a proactive approach to managing security challenges.

Designed for enterprises requiring robust threat management, Google Security Operations harnesses the power of Google's infrastructure to deliver comprehensive insights into potential vulnerabilities and attack vectors. Leveraging AI and machine learning, users benefit from enhanced accuracy and speed in identifying threats, making it a crucial tool in maintaining cybersecurity resilience. Its adaptability allows businesses to customize security protocols, ensuring alignment with specific security strategies.

What are the most crucial features of Google Security Operations?
  • Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify potential threats quickly.
  • Automated Response: Streamlines response measures to mitigate risks efficiently.
  • Scalability: Designed to grow with the security demands of an organization.
  • Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with existing security tools and platforms.
What benefits do users gain from Google Security Operations?
  • Improved Security Posture: Strengthens defenses against emerging threats.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for extensive manual monitoring efforts.
  • Enhanced Decision Making: Provides detailed insights for informed security strategies.
  • Operational Efficiency: Increases the effectiveness of cybersecurity teams.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Google Security Operations is implemented to address specific regulatory and compliance requirements. Its adaptive features support cybersecurity frameworks, ensuring data protection and risk management standards are met effectively.

Splunk SOAR offers features like automation and orchestration of manual tasks, speeding up work, detection and response to advanced and emerging threats. 

Go from overwhelmed to in-control

Automate manual tasks. Address every alert, every day. Establish repeatable procedures that allow security analysts to stop being reactive and focus on mission-critical objectives to protect your business.

Force multiply your team

Orchestrate and automate repetitive tasks, investigation and response to increase efficiency and productivity, and do more with the people you already have. Make a team of three feel like a team of 10.

From 30 minutes to 30 seconds

Work faster with Splunk SOAR. Respond to threats in seconds. Lower your mean time to respond (MTTR) by automating security tasks and workflows across all of your security tools.

End-to-end security operations made easy

Take advantage of Splunk Enterprise Security and Splunk SOAR joining forces to provide a seamless and intuitive SecOps platform to prevent, detect and respond to advanced and emerging threats.

 

Sample Customers

FedEx Mondelez Intenrational Check Point Trustwave Atos Cyberint Bae Systems Crowe Longwall Security Telefonica Nordea HCL
Recorded Future, Blackstone
Buyer's Guide
Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR
October 2024
Free Report: Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
814,485 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR report.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.