Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR comparison

Google and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Google is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Google holds a 1.6% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Splunk’s 7.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
Google Security Operations
Read 4 Google Security Operations reviews
  • 728 Views
  • 482 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
Splunk SOAR
Read 44 Splunk SOAR reviews
  • 4,577 Views
  • 2,761 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Google Security Operations and Splunk SOAR are products in the security operations field. Google Security Operations holds an edge due to its integrated cloud-native approach, while Splunk SOAR is noted for its strong automation capabilities.

Features: Google Security Operations offers data integration and analysis leveraging Google Cloud's infrastructure, strong threat detection and hunting capabilities, and seamless integration within Google's ecosystem. Splunk SOAR excels in automation thanks to customizable playbooks, versatile third-party integrations, and a mature orchestration module.

Room for Improvement: Google Security Operations could enhance its flexibility to match a wider range of environments, improve third-party integration support, and expand its automation features. Splunk SOAR could refine its user interface for easy adaptability, streamline documentation for less common integrations, and reduce setup complexity for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Security Operations provides streamlined deployment through Google Cloud and offers specialized support leveraging Google's infrastructure. Splunk SOAR requires more setup but offers customizable deployment with thorough documentation and robust community support, providing flexibility in different IT environments.

Pricing and ROI: Google Security Operations typically involves costs related to cloud services with predictable ROI through integrated solutions, enhanced by its seamless cloud integration. Splunk SOAR may involve higher upfront costs due to customization and powerful automation, promising strong ROI via improved operational efficiency and flexibility at a premium.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Security Operations
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
16th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (32nd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (10th)
Splunk SOAR
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Google Security Operations is 1.6%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk SOAR is 7.2%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2203269 - PeerSpot reviewer
Real-time threat detection and alarm management have improved security operations
Google SecOps is extremely useful for threat detection and hunting. It provides a detailed pipeline for detection and is beneficial for real-time threat monitoring when integrated with Mandiant. The tool's integration capabilities are effective, and it helps in managing alarms for normal threats efficiently. Overall, Google SecOps is a very useful service for security operations.
Read full review
Shubham Sinha. - PeerSpot reviewer
Helped eliminate repetitive and redundant tasks, but custom functions and reporting need a lot of work
The visibility of the solution’s playbook viewer depends on the right you assign to the analyst. SOAR has the flexibility to distinguish between the roles of analyst and owner. If the analyst's role is to just work on a ticket, they cannot view the playbook design platform. That is limited to the owner. That can be both a good and bad thing. A major problem I have faced in SOAR's rights distribution is roles and responsibilities. Suppose I am initially granted user rights or analyst rights, but later on, I also get admin rights. SOAR is unable to amend the limitations of my role. I raised a support ticket with Splunk about this. They said it's a bug in their 5.3.5 version. To fix this, I had to reinstall the entire platform from scratch, just to amend the rights and responsibilities of one role. This bug was not fixed. Also, the latest GUI is terrible. The previous one was better. Another point is that while using Splunk SOAR in an investigation is not difficult, there are some complex parameters. We have SOAR case management, but the licensing is going to put a big hole in your pocket. Also, there is an issue with investigation node addition. When you are doing node additions you cannot grant the entire environment to have SOAR visibility into the incident. So when you integrate it with an ITSM tool, like ServiceNow or Jira for ticketing purposes, there is a challenge. When you do nodes for investigation on a regular basis, sometimes it does not update our ServiceNow platform, which is terrible. It is a redundant activity for an analyst to update that in the case management as well as in the ITSM tool. Although SOAR provides integration, the functionality of investigation and nodes is terrible when it comes to integration. An additional area for improvement is custom function creation. It's terrible. A newbie cannot create custom functions right away. They would require a solid understanding first. Also, the reporting is really awful. If I want to do a report for a customized time period, such as the last three days or the last four days, or from the 10th to the 12th of June, that is not available in SOAR at all. That kind of feature is available in Cortex XSOAR. Reporting is a real challenge.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Without hyperbole, I have never, in my entire career, encountered a vendor or a vendor community as awesome as Siemplify. Siemplify and the Siemplify Community quite literally made it possible for our SOC to increase almost five-fold in our number of clients and number of analysts and to go from a Monday to Friday 9-5 shop to a 24/7 shop all in the span of under a year and a half and all while continually adding capabilities and improving the services we offer to our clients."
"Overall, Google SecOps is a very useful service for security operations."
"Google SecOps is extremely useful for threat detection and hunting."
"The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user interface is generally straightforward, although recent changes may require some adjustment and Siemplify's integrations and capabilities offer potential support for various compliance requirements."
"The most valuable feature of Siemplify is the playbooks that can be created."
"SOAR allows custom code to be written and integrates with various technologies through pre-built apps like Windows Remote Management or custom apps we can build ourselves like a secret retrieval app from our vault."
"Our customers find it easy to conduct searches and consider it an excellent content management system."
"So far, the interface is very easy to use."
"The ability to automate Splunk SOAR and customize the playbook use cases is the most valuable feature and is very exciting for me."
"The customization continues to be excellent."
"Its ability to integrate with other systems and applications in our environment is pretty easy. Sometimes if we see any complexity we try to involve a consultant to help us. Everything is through the built-in app. Splunk can connect to any assets through the built-in app. It could be in a platform, firewalls, or endpoints. It's easy if it's an app integration."
"It's pretty easy when it comes to setting up assets. If you want to fetch emails or call a REST API, you can set up an asset and grab that information."
"The solution’s dashboard is really good and customizable. It also has a good UI."
More Splunk SOAR pros
 

Cons

"The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions."
"I'm inclined to say that I'd love to see some Machine Learning capabilities integrated into the platform, however, I just attended a demo this morning where Siemplify gave a sneak peek into some Machine Learning capabilities that they are currently developing and have roadmapped for release soon."
"We often encounter minor issues that could be improved, but we maintain communication with the developers and submit feature requests. Recently, I requested enhancements such as improved search functionality within playbooks and expanded options for exporting case data."
"Building the playbooks could be easier and the integration could improve. It is a difficult process, such as what API connections need to be made."
"The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions."
"Improving the integration ecosystem can raise the quality of the bottom tier of the integrations so that they can work better out of the box."
"The technical support for the Splunk SIEM solution was average."
"And most of the challenges that I have faced with the solution can be found in the documentation itself."
"It would be ideal for us if Splunk SOAR could integrate with Teams."
"Providing Splunk app developers and playbook developers Python Stub files so that way when they create custom code through their IDE, they can have IntelliCode suggestions."
"The application does not work properly and does not pass the log-based configuration. I feel that some kind of review should happen in the application. This review should validate things so that we can get the right information. Splunk does not tell us where the IP address is associated with."
"There is a lot of room for improvement with the UI."
"The creation of playbooks is complex in Splunk SOAR, and the number of integrations needs enhancement. Although it enhances alert handling, it still has a journey to compete with Palo Alto SOAR and FortiSOAR."
More Splunk SOAR cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The tool is not cheap."
"The licensing cost is reasonable."
"When we first purchased our Splunk SOAR license, it was based on an event-count model. It was based on the number of events. I had strong opinions at the time that automation should not be stifled by the amount of automation you can accomplish, so the previous structure was not as beneficial for us. Later that year, we got told or saw at a conference that they announced user-based pricing. We are now in a renewal period, so we migrated to a user-based license model, which is more appropriate for us so that we no longer have to worry about stifling our automation based on the quantity."
"Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all the functions and tie together the data. It's the perfect tool for our needs."
"The cost is high and the licensing is on an annual basis."
"Splunk SOAR is more expensive compared to other options for SOAR."
"Splunk SOAR is an expensive solution for an organization of our size."
"We renewed it this year. This year was the first time there was a dramatic increase in the price. It was kind of non-negotiable. It was just a high increase. We had internal communications, and it was definitely a surprise to us. In a short time frame, we renewed it this year. Prices are going up everywhere, but they are not always justifiable, at least not to our eyes. The pricing this year was definitely a big shock."
More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Retailer
10%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Siemplify?
The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user inter...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Siemplify?
The pricing for Google SecOps and Microsoft Sentinel is almost the same, with no significant differences.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Siemplify?
The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions. Google SecOps reports could be more detailed, similar to the comprehensive descriptions provided by Microso...
See all answers
What do you like most about Splunk Phantom?
Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?
Splunk SOAR is affordable cost-wise only, but not competitive from a technical perspective compared to Palo Alto SOAR and FortiSOAR.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?
The creation of playbooks is complex in Splunk SOAR ( /categories/security-orchestration-automation-and-response-soar ), and the number of integrations needs enhancement. Although it enhances alert...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Security Operations Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Security Operations
Compared 17% of the time
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Google Security Operations Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Google Security Operations
Compared 17% of the time
Google Chronicle Suite vs Google Security Operations Logo
Google Chronicle Suite vs Google Security Operations
Compared 14% of the time
Cortex XSIAM vs Google Security Operations Logo
Cortex XSIAM vs Google Security Operations
Compared 12% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Google Security Operations Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Google Security Operations
Compared 8% of the time
More Google Security Operations Competitors
Cortex XSIAM vs Splunk SOAR Logo
Cortex XSIAM vs Splunk SOAR
Compared 23% of the time
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR
Compared 19% of the time
Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR
Compared 10% of the time
Tines vs Splunk SOAR Logo
Tines vs Splunk SOAR
Compared 10% of the time
Microsoft Sentinel vs Splunk SOAR Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Splunk SOAR
Compared 4% of the time
More Splunk SOAR Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
April 2025
Google Security Operations reportDownload Google Security Operations product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk SOAR
March 2025
Splunk SOAR reportDownload Splunk SOAR product report
 

Also Known As

Siemplify ThreatNexus
Phantom
 

Overview

Google Security Operations provides advanced threat detection and response capabilities. Tailored for cybersecurity professionals, it integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure, offering a proactive approach to managing security challenges.

Designed for enterprises requiring robust threat management, Google Security Operations harnesses the power of Google's infrastructure to deliver comprehensive insights into potential vulnerabilities and attack vectors. Leveraging AI and machine learning, users benefit from enhanced accuracy and speed in identifying threats, making it a crucial tool in maintaining cybersecurity resilience. Its adaptability allows businesses to customize security protocols, ensuring alignment with specific security strategies.

What are the most crucial features of Google Security Operations?

  • Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify potential threats quickly.
  • Automated Response: Streamlines response measures to mitigate risks efficiently.
  • Scalability: Designed to grow with the security demands of an organization.
  • Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with existing security tools and platforms.

What benefits do users gain from Google Security Operations?

  • Improved Security Posture: Strengthens defenses against emerging threats.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for extensive manual monitoring efforts.
  • Enhanced Decision Making: Provides detailed insights for informed security strategies.
  • Operational Efficiency: Increases the effectiveness of cybersecurity teams.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Google Security Operations is implemented to address specific regulatory and compliance requirements. Its adaptive features support cybersecurity frameworks, ensuring data protection and risk management standards are met effectively.

Google

Splunk SOAR offers features like automation and orchestration of manual tasks, speeding up work, detection and response to advanced and emerging threats. 

Go from overwhelmed to in-control

Automate manual tasks. Address every alert, every day. Establish repeatable procedures that allow security analysts to stop being reactive and focus on mission-critical objectives to protect your business.

Force multiply your team

Orchestrate and automate repetitive tasks, investigation and response to increase efficiency and productivity, and do more with the people you already have. Make a team of three feel like a team of 10.

From 30 minutes to 30 seconds

Work faster with Splunk SOAR. Respond to threats in seconds. Lower your mean time to respond (MTTR) by automating security tasks and workflows across all of your security tools.

End-to-end security operations made easy

Take advantage of Splunk Enterprise Security and Splunk SOAR joining forces to provide a seamless and intuitive SecOps platform to prevent, detect and respond to advanced and emerging threats.

Splunk
 

Sample Customers

FedEx Mondelez Intenrational Check Point Trustwave Atos Cyberint Bae Systems Crowe Longwall Security Telefonica Nordea HCL
Recorded Future, Blackstone
Buyer's Guide
Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR
April 2025
Free Report: Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR report.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.