Google Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR comparison

Google and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Google is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.7, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. Google holds a 1.3% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Splunk’s 7.2% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Google Security Operations

Read 3 Google Security Operations reviews

775 Views
493 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Splunk SOAR

Read 43 Splunk SOAR reviews

4,898 Views
2,961 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Google Security Operations

Splunk SOAR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 29, 2024

Google Security Operations and Splunk SOAR are leading contenders in cybersecurity, focusing on security information and event management tools. Google Security Operations holds an advantage with better integration and scalability, while Splunk SOAR shines in automation capabilities, enhancing security posture.

Features: Google Security Operations offers seamless integration with Google Cloud services, strong threat intelligence, and scalability benefits. Splunk SOAR provides comprehensive automation, advanced orchestration functionalities, and efficient incident response mechanisms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Security Operations facilitates straightforward cloud-based deployment, making it user-friendly in cloud environments. Splunk SOAR presents flexible deployment options tailored to diverse environments, though its extensive customization offers complexity. Google's deployment process is more streamlined, while Splunk allows intricate configuration to suit specific infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Google Security Operations often incurs lower initial setup costs due to its cloud-native framework, reducing infrastructure expenditures. Splunk SOAR may demand higher initial investment because of its feature-rich platform but promises significant ROI by minimizing manual tasks through automation. Google's pricing is cost-efficient, whereas Splunk justifies higher costs with long-term automation benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,340 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Security Operations

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (38th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (10th)

Splunk SOAR

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Google Security Operations is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk SOAR is 7.2%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

Cyrus Robinson, CISSP, CEH, CHFI, MCSE, MCITP, MCSA

SOC Director at Ingalls Information Security

Great for reporting and ticketing for SOC MxDR client environments and has a great, supportive community

There are so many incredible features in the Chronicle SOAR platform that it's difficult to narrow down the list, however, if I had to choose, I would say that the most valuable features are the playbook builder and the integrations. The playbook builder allows us to establish workflows for the various case types that our analysts encounter within the SOC. These can be as granular or as high level as they need to be depending upon our business objectives and alert priorities. In turn, the tremendous number of integrations in the marketplace and the IDE (to custom-develop new integrations) are what make the playbooks as powerful as they are. Together, the integrations and playbooks make it simple to integrate powerful new capabilities and workflows.

Read full review

Shubham Sinha.

Senior Principal Information Security Analyst at Veritas Technologies LLC

Helped eliminate repetitive and redundant tasks, but custom functions and reporting need a lot of work

The visibility of the solution’s playbook viewer depends on the right you assign to the analyst. SOAR has the flexibility to distinguish between the roles of analyst and owner. If the analyst's role is to just work on a ticket, they cannot view the playbook design platform. That is limited to the owner. That can be both a good and bad thing. A major problem I have faced in SOAR's rights distribution is roles and responsibilities. Suppose I am initially granted user rights or analyst rights, but later on, I also get admin rights. SOAR is unable to amend the limitations of my role. I raised a support ticket with Splunk about this. They said it's a bug in their 5.3.5 version. To fix this, I had to reinstall the entire platform from scratch, just to amend the rights and responsibilities of one role. This bug was not fixed. Also, the latest GUI is terrible. The previous one was better. Another point is that while using Splunk SOAR in an investigation is not difficult, there are some complex parameters. We have SOAR case management, but the licensing is going to put a big hole in your pocket. Also, there is an issue with investigation node addition. When you are doing node additions you cannot grant the entire environment to have SOAR visibility into the incident. So when you integrate it with an ITSM tool, like ServiceNow or Jira for ticketing purposes, there is a challenge. When you do nodes for investigation on a regular basis, sometimes it does not update our ServiceNow platform, which is terrible. It is a redundant activity for an analyst to update that in the case management as well as in the ITSM tool. Although SOAR provides integration, the functionality of investigation and nodes is terrible when it comes to integration. An additional area for improvement is custom function creation. It's terrible. A newbie cannot create custom functions right away. They would require a solid understanding first. Also, the reporting is really awful. If I want to do a report for a customized time period, such as the last three days or the last four days, or from the 10th to the 12th of June, that is not available in SOAR at all. That kind of feature is available in Cortex XSOAR. Reporting is a real challenge.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Without hyperbole, I have never, in my entire career, encountered a vendor or a vendor community as awesome as Siemplify. Siemplify and the Siemplify Community quite literally made it possible for our SOC to increase almost five-fold in our number of clients and number of analysts and to go from a Monday to Friday 9-5 shop to a 24/7 shop all in the span of under a year and a half and all while continually adding capabilities and improving the services we offer to our clients."

"The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user interface is generally straightforward, although recent changes may require some adjustment and Siemplify's integrations and capabilities offer potential support for various compliance requirements."

"The most valuable feature of Siemplify is the playbooks that can be created."

"It's pretty easy when it comes to setting up assets. If you want to fetch emails or call a REST API, you can set up an asset and grab that information."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its searchability and ease of action on the logs. I can easily search within the logs and take action on them, and I can trace them back to my environment because the way the logs are written is very helpful for us."

"I have found all the security automation platform features of Splunk SOAR to be good. The Automation playbook development is highly useful."

"In Splunk SOAR, I find the playbooks valuable. We get to create multiple playbooks, and within each playbook, there is a different type of investigation attached to it, which helps out an analyst or new analysts coming on board."

"I like the integration capabilities of Phantom. It has a lot of integrations with other products. Its searching methodologies are also good. It is also easy to understand and easy to create playbooks."

"The automation part of the product is great."

"When you design a playbook, you can integrate multiple log sources and define rules... After that, the platform automatically compiles all these activities and, based on the results, the analyst only has to indicate whether the result is a true or false positive. That reduces the time and effort involved."

"The product’s integration with other Splunk products is valuable."

More Splunk SOAR pros

Cons

"We often encounter minor issues that could be improved, but we maintain communication with the developers and submit feature requests. Recently, I requested enhancements such as improved search functionality within playbooks and expanded options for exporting case data."

"I'm inclined to say that I'd love to see some Machine Learning capabilities integrated into the platform, however, I just attended a demo this morning where Siemplify gave a sneak peek into some Machine Learning capabilities that they are currently developing and have roadmapped for release soon."

"Building the playbooks could be easier and the integration could improve. It is a difficult process, such as what API connections need to be made."

"Unfortunately, not all of our analysts are iPhone users or iOS users. The mobile app is only supported on iOS. Our analysts who have Android do not have that benefit. That would be a nice thing to have so that we can have it across the board and not just for iOS."

"SOAR is probably the most unreliable product Splunk has and that's because most of it is content driven from what you put into it. There are certain parts of it that have a little bit of difficulty at volume too. It's always changing. There is new stuff coming out for it that's going to make it a little bit better, but it does have some drawbacks."

"Various aspects of the playbook development process itself can be optimized."

"Splunk's support for integration is subpar and has room for improvement."

"Splunk SOAR can improve IoT/OT security-related case studies or your use cases. Their integration with identity and access management (IAM) solutions is a bit shaky. They don't have good integration with a lot of IAM solutions. They do have good capability in terms of user access management internally, but even with privileged user access, they have a good module. However, if they have to integrate with solutions, such as CyberArk or IBM IAM solutions they are lacking, the visibility of user access is not that much."

"Suppose I am initially granted user rights or analyst rights, but later on, I also get admin rights. SOAR is unable to amend the limitations of my role. I raised a support ticket with Splunk about this. They said it's a bug in their 5.3.5 version. To fix this, I had to reinstall the entire platform from scratch.."

"It would be ideal if we could automate processes even more."

"It could be easier to implement."

More Splunk SOAR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"In my opinion, the price is high, but if you want good products, you have to be willing to pay for them."

"Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all the functions and tie together the data. It's the perfect tool for our needs."

"We renewed it this year. This year was the first time there was a dramatic increase in the price. It was kind of non-negotiable. It was just a high increase. We had internal communications, and it was definitely a surprise to us. In a short time frame, we renewed it this year. Prices are going up everywhere, but they are not always justifiable, at least not to our eyes. The pricing this year was definitely a big shock."

"The cost is high and the licensing is on an annual basis."

"I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."

"When we first purchased our Splunk SOAR license, it was based on an event-count model. It was based on the number of events. I had strong opinions at the time that automation should not be stifled by the amount of automation you can accomplish, so the previous structure was not as beneficial for us. Later that year, we got told or saw at a conference that they announced user-based pricing. We are now in a renewal period, so we migrated to a user-based license model, which is more appropriate for us so that we no longer have to worry about stifling our automation based on the quantity."

"Splunk SOAR is an expensive solution for an organization of our size."

"The tool is not cheap."

More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,340 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

16%

Retailer

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Siemplify?

The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user inter...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Siemplify?

We often encounter minor issues that could be improved, but we maintain communication with the developers and submit feature requests. Recently, I requested enhancements such as improved search fun...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Siemplify?

Siemplify has streamlined various tasks such as configuring playbooks, integrations, and running reports. It helps automate security incident response processes through configuration setup and prov...

See all answers

What do you like most about Splunk Phantom?

Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?

I rate Splunk SOAR two out of 10 for affordability. Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?

The dashboard could be improved and some other features. SOAR should integrate network capabilities, allowing us to also monitor the WLAN network. Splunk is also expensive and difficult for beginne...

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Google Security Operations

Compared 39% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Security Operations

Compared 23% of the time

More Google Security Operations Competitors

Cortex XSIAM vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 27% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 17% of the time

Tines vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Resilient vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 3% of the time

More Splunk SOAR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

February 2025

Download Google Security Operations product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR

January 2025

Download Splunk SOAR product report

Also Known As

Siemplify ThreatNexus

Phantom

Overview

Google Security Operations provides advanced threat detection and response capabilities. Tailored for cybersecurity professionals, it integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure, offering a proactive approach to managing security challenges.

Designed for enterprises requiring robust threat management, Google Security Operations harnesses the power of Google's infrastructure to deliver comprehensive insights into potential vulnerabilities and attack vectors. Leveraging AI and machine learning, users benefit from enhanced accuracy and speed in identifying threats, making it a crucial tool in maintaining cybersecurity resilience. Its adaptability allows businesses to customize security protocols, ensuring alignment with specific security strategies.

What are the most crucial features of Google Security Operations?

Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify potential threats quickly.
Automated Response: Streamlines response measures to mitigate risks efficiently.
Scalability: Designed to grow with the security demands of an organization.
Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with existing security tools and platforms.

What benefits do users gain from Google Security Operations?

Improved Security Posture: Strengthens defenses against emerging threats.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for extensive manual monitoring efforts.
Enhanced Decision Making: Provides detailed insights for informed security strategies.
Operational Efficiency: Increases the effectiveness of cybersecurity teams.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Google Security Operations is implemented to address specific regulatory and compliance requirements. Its adaptive features support cybersecurity frameworks, ensuring data protection and risk management standards are met effectively.

Google

Splunk SOAR offers features like automation and orchestration of manual tasks, speeding up work, detection and response to advanced and emerging threats.

Go from overwhelmed to in-control

Automate manual tasks. Address every alert, every day. Establish repeatable procedures that allow security analysts to stop being reactive and focus on mission-critical objectives to protect your business.

Force multiply your team

Orchestrate and automate repetitive tasks, investigation and response to increase efficiency and productivity, and do more with the people you already have. Make a team of three feel like a team of 10.

From 30 minutes to 30 seconds

Work faster with Splunk SOAR. Respond to threats in seconds. Lower your mean time to respond (MTTR) by automating security tasks and workflows across all of your security tools.

End-to-end security operations made easy

Take advantage of Splunk Enterprise Security and Splunk SOAR joining forces to provide a seamless and intuitive SecOps platform to prevent, detect and respond to advanced and emerging threats.

Splunk

Sample Customers

FedEx Mondelez Intenrational Check Point Trustwave Atos Cyberint Bae Systems Crowe Longwall Security Telefonica Nordea HCL

Recorded Future, Blackstone

Buyer's Guide

Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR

January 2025

Free Report: Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,340 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.