Google Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR comparison

Google and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Google is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.7, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. Google holds a 1.3% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Splunk’s 8.3% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Google Security Operations

Read 3 Google Security Operations reviews

812 Views
504 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Splunk SOAR

Read 43 Splunk SOAR reviews

5,110 Views
3,052 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Google Security Operations

Splunk SOAR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 29, 2024

Google Security Operations and Splunk SOAR are leading contenders in cybersecurity, focusing on security information and event management tools. Google Security Operations holds an advantage with better integration and scalability, while Splunk SOAR shines in automation capabilities, enhancing security posture.

Features: Google Security Operations offers seamless integration with Google Cloud services, strong threat intelligence, and scalability benefits. Splunk SOAR provides comprehensive automation, advanced orchestration functionalities, and efficient incident response mechanisms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Security Operations facilitates straightforward cloud-based deployment, making it user-friendly in cloud environments. Splunk SOAR presents flexible deployment options tailored to diverse environments, though its extensive customization offers complexity. Google's deployment process is more streamlined, while Splunk allows intricate configuration to suit specific infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Google Security Operations often incurs lower initial setup costs due to its cloud-native framework, reducing infrastructure expenditures. Splunk SOAR may demand higher initial investment because of its feature-rich platform but promises significant ROI by minimizing manual tasks through automation. Google's pricing is cost-efficient, whereas Splunk justifies higher costs with long-term automation benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 825,625 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Google Security Operations

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (35th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (10th)

Splunk SOAR

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Google Security Operations is 1.3%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk SOAR is 8.3%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

Cyrus Robinson, CISSP, CEH, CHFI, MCSE, MCITP, MCSA

SOC Director at Ingalls Information Security

Great for reporting and ticketing for SOC MxDR client environments and has a great, supportive community

There are so many incredible features in the Chronicle SOAR platform that it's difficult to narrow down the list, however, if I had to choose, I would say that the most valuable features are the playbook builder and the integrations. The playbook builder allows us to establish workflows for the various case types that our analysts encounter within the SOC. These can be as granular or as high level as they need to be depending upon our business objectives and alert priorities. In turn, the tremendous number of integrations in the marketplace and the IDE (to custom-develop new integrations) are what make the playbooks as powerful as they are. Together, the integrations and playbooks make it simple to integrate powerful new capabilities and workflows.

Read full review

Ryan Plas

SOAR Engineer at Accenture Federal Services

Offers playbook automation that helps reduce the manual and tedious work for users

When it comes to Splunk SOAR's ability to provide end-to-end visibility into our company's cloud-native environment, I would say that we are not using the cloud portions of it. I don't know if that's super relevant to what we are doing in our organization. I am 100 percent sure that Splunk SOAR helped reduce your mean time to resolve, but I don't have any metrics on hand but I know it has dramatically decreased. The tool has helped with the business resilience part. I think having it as a platform has been a solid portion of the product that we offer to people. Spunk SOAR has definitely saved my time in alert triage. When some of the tedious enrichment and lookup stuff happens, the analyst doesn't have to deal with such areas, and they can just jump in and see relevant data all in one pane of glass, which has been super helpful for speeding things up. The unified platform helps consolidate networking, security, and IT observability tools. The consolidation of tools impacts our organization as it just helps focus the SOC analyst on a single unified place to find information. It helps keep things streamlined and regular so they know where to look for certain stuff they want. It really helps people with training. It is a really easy tool to onboard people into because everything is right there in the product itself. The product is really great. I would love to see more SOAR innovation going into the tool, especially the on-premises version since it is what we use in our company. I feel the tool needs to encourage continuous improvements, but as a product itself, my company is really happy with the solution. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Siemplify is the playbooks that can be created."

"The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user interface is generally straightforward, although recent changes may require some adjustment and Siemplify's integrations and capabilities offer potential support for various compliance requirements."

"Without hyperbole, I have never, in my entire career, encountered a vendor or a vendor community as awesome as Siemplify. Siemplify and the Siemplify Community quite literally made it possible for our SOC to increase almost five-fold in our number of clients and number of analysts and to go from a Monday to Friday 9-5 shop to a 24/7 shop all in the span of under a year and a half and all while continually adding capabilities and improving the services we offer to our clients."

"Before its use, analyzing each email would take at least 15 to 20 minutes, with some complex cases taking up to 30 minutes...With the automation provided by Splunk Phantom, we could significantly reduce the amount of time and human effort required to complete this task."

"The most valuable feature is the API connector, depending on how it's formatted and who made the actual app offering for it. The REST API is my favorite component. It's very easy to use. The filters are also really valuable. Those are the two primary features but I enjoy using the rest of it."

"In Splunk SOAR, I find the playbooks valuable. We get to create multiple playbooks, and within each playbook, there is a different type of investigation attached to it, which helps out an analyst or new analysts coming on board."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the playbook automation just because it allows us to reduce the manual actions that SOC has to handle."

"The solution’s dashboard is really good and customizable. It also has a good UI."

"Its ability to integrate with other systems and applications in our environment is pretty easy. Sometimes if we see any complexity we try to involve a consultant to help us. Everything is through the built-in app. Splunk can connect to any assets through the built-in app. It could be in a platform, firewalls, or endpoints. It's easy if it's an app integration."

"The automation part of the product is great."

"When you design a playbook, you can integrate multiple log sources and define rules... After that, the platform automatically compiles all these activities and, based on the results, the analyst only has to indicate whether the result is a true or false positive. That reduces the time and effort involved."

More Splunk SOAR pros

Cons

"We often encounter minor issues that could be improved, but we maintain communication with the developers and submit feature requests. Recently, I requested enhancements such as improved search functionality within playbooks and expanded options for exporting case data."

"I'm inclined to say that I'd love to see some Machine Learning capabilities integrated into the platform, however, I just attended a demo this morning where Siemplify gave a sneak peek into some Machine Learning capabilities that they are currently developing and have roadmapped for release soon."

"Building the playbooks could be easier and the integration could improve. It is a difficult process, such as what API connections need to be made."

"The tool's response is slower because it has to search through a huge dataset, which can be improved for latency."

"We want to see improvements made to the APIs such that we can connect to many different systems and data sources."

"We have playbooks written to extract these events and put them into the workflow since it wasn't structured as expected. It was a miss for us. We couldn't figure out why it broke or what actually happened there. It was something in this feed with legitimate and security events, so we tried to understand the names and what we would call them."

"Splunk's support for integration is subpar and has room for improvement."

"The technical support for the Splunk SIEM solution was average."

"We've had trouble implementing the solution with Microsoft products. There seems to be an integration gap."

"Splunk SOAR should improve its ease of upgrade, which is a pain point for us right now."

"It could be easier to implement."

More Splunk SOAR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I found the price of Splunk SOAR to be good."

"When we first purchased our Splunk SOAR license, it was based on an event-count model. It was based on the number of events. I had strong opinions at the time that automation should not be stifled by the amount of automation you can accomplish, so the previous structure was not as beneficial for us. Later that year, we got told or saw at a conference that they announced user-based pricing. We are now in a renewal period, so we migrated to a user-based license model, which is more appropriate for us so that we no longer have to worry about stifling our automation based on the quantity."

"It's very overpriced because it is based on the number of users. There is no bulk licensing."

"I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."

"In my opinion, the price is high, but if you want good products, you have to be willing to pay for them."

"The tool is not cheap."

"We renewed it this year. This year was the first time there was a dramatic increase in the price. It was kind of non-negotiable. It was just a high increase. We had internal communications, and it was definitely a surprise to us. In a short time frame, we renewed it this year. Prices are going up everywhere, but they are not always justifiable, at least not to our eyes. The pricing this year was definitely a big shock."

"Splunk SOAR is an expensive solution for an organization of our size."

More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

825,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Retailer

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Siemplify?

The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user inter...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Siemplify?

We often encounter minor issues that could be improved, but we maintain communication with the developers and submit feature requests. Recently, I requested enhancements such as improved search fun...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Siemplify?

Siemplify has streamlined various tasks such as configuring playbooks, integrations, and running reports. It helps automate security incident response processes through configuration setup and prov...

See all answers

What do you like most about Splunk Phantom?

Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?

I rate Splunk SOAR two out of 10 for affordability. Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?

The dashboard could be improved and some other features. SOAR should integrate network capabilities, allowing us to also monitor the WLAN network. Splunk is also expensive and difficult for beginne...

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Google Security Operations

Compared 36% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Security Operations

Compared 19% of the time

More Google Security Operations Competitors

Cortex XSIAM vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 28% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 18% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 8% of the time

Tines vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Resilient vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk SOAR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

December 2024

Download Google Security Operations product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR

December 2024

Download Splunk SOAR product report

Also Known As

Siemplify ThreatNexus

Phantom

Learn More

Google

Splunk

Overview

Google Security Operations provides advanced threat detection and response capabilities. Tailored for cybersecurity professionals, it integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure, offering a proactive approach to managing security challenges.

Designed for enterprises requiring robust threat management, Google Security Operations harnesses the power of Google's infrastructure to deliver comprehensive insights into potential vulnerabilities and attack vectors. Leveraging AI and machine learning, users benefit from enhanced accuracy and speed in identifying threats, making it a crucial tool in maintaining cybersecurity resilience. Its adaptability allows businesses to customize security protocols, ensuring alignment with specific security strategies.

What are the most crucial features of Google Security Operations?

Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify potential threats quickly.
Automated Response: Streamlines response measures to mitigate risks efficiently.
Scalability: Designed to grow with the security demands of an organization.
Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with existing security tools and platforms.

What benefits do users gain from Google Security Operations?

Improved Security Posture: Strengthens defenses against emerging threats.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for extensive manual monitoring efforts.
Enhanced Decision Making: Provides detailed insights for informed security strategies.
Operational Efficiency: Increases the effectiveness of cybersecurity teams.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Google Security Operations is implemented to address specific regulatory and compliance requirements. Its adaptive features support cybersecurity frameworks, ensuring data protection and risk management standards are met effectively.

Splunk SOAR offers features like automation and orchestration of manual tasks, speeding up work, detection and response to advanced and emerging threats.

Go from overwhelmed to in-control

Automate manual tasks. Address every alert, every day. Establish repeatable procedures that allow security analysts to stop being reactive and focus on mission-critical objectives to protect your business.

Force multiply your team

Orchestrate and automate repetitive tasks, investigation and response to increase efficiency and productivity, and do more with the people you already have. Make a team of three feel like a team of 10.

From 30 minutes to 30 seconds

Work faster with Splunk SOAR. Respond to threats in seconds. Lower your mean time to respond (MTTR) by automating security tasks and workflows across all of your security tools.

End-to-end security operations made easy

Take advantage of Splunk Enterprise Security and Splunk SOAR joining forces to provide a seamless and intuitive SecOps platform to prevent, detect and respond to advanced and emerging threats.

Sample Customers

FedEx Mondelez Intenrational Check Point Trustwave Atos Cyberint Bae Systems Crowe Longwall Security Telefonica Nordea HCL

Recorded Future, Blackstone

Buyer's Guide

Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR

December 2024

Free Report: Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

825,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.