Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk SOAR based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Sentinel, Elastic Security, and AWS Security Hub.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Splunk SOAR surpasses its competitors by offering seamless automation and orchestration of security operations, advanced threat intelligence integration, and an intuitive interface that boosts productivity and efficiency for security teams.
Splunk Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Splunk SOAR offers superior non-Microsoft tool integration and strong automation, appealing to multifaceted environments. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel excels within the Microsoft ecosystem, leveraging Azure Logic Apps for analytics, which attracts users invested in Microsoft infrastructure.
Splunk SOAR involves significant initial setup costs, contrasting with Microsoft Sentinel's more accessible setup expenses. This difference in setup costs highlights varying approaches to initial financial investment between the two solutions.
Splunk SOAR involves significant initial setup costs, contrasting with Microsoft Sentinel's more accessible setup expenses. This difference in setup costs highlights varying approaches to initial financial investment between the two solutions.
Elastic Security offers scalability, ease of data visualization, and flexibility with its open-source platform. In comparison, Splunk SOAR focuses on automation and integration with mature playbooks. Elastic attracts through cost-effectiveness, while Splunk appeals with comprehensive features despite higher costs.
Elastic Security offers cost-effective setup with straightforward processes, while Splunk SOAR tends to have higher initial costs due to its advanced integration capabilities.
Elastic Security offers cost-effective setup with straightforward processes, while Splunk SOAR tends to have higher initial costs due to its advanced integration capabilities.
Splunk SOAR stands out for customizable automation and integration across platforms, appealing to users needing advanced automation. In comparison, AWS Security Hub excels in AWS service integration, attracting those within the AWS ecosystem who seek seamless operation and accessible pricing.
Splunk SOAR has a higher setup cost, while AWS Security Hub offers a more affordable initial investment, highlighting a clear difference in initial pricing for organizations evaluating their security tool options.
Splunk SOAR has a higher setup cost, while AWS Security Hub offers a more affordable initial investment, highlighting a clear difference in initial pricing for organizations evaluating their security tool options.
Cortex XSOAR excels in automation and diverse playbook options, ideal for dynamic SOC environments. In comparison, Splunk SOAR's strength lies in custom playbook creation with flexible integrations. Cortex XSOAR benefits large organizations with its features, while Splunk SOAR offers customization for varied use cases.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is recognized for its seamless initial setup while Splunk SOAR users highlight a more detailed configuration process. This reflects a clear divergence in setup approaches between the two security automation platforms.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is recognized for its seamless initial setup while Splunk SOAR users highlight a more detailed configuration process. This reflects a clear divergence in setup approaches between the two security automation platforms.
Exabeam excels in advanced analytics and threat detection, appealing to those prioritizing security insights. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers robust integration and orchestration, ideal for organizations seeking extensive workflows and playbook automation. Exabeam's pricing is attractive, while Splunk SOAR's capabilities justify its higher cost.
Exabeam setup cost is more budget-friendly, while Splunk SOAR may require a larger upfront investment. Users often find Exabeam's pricing more accessible compared to Splunk SOAR's costlier implementation fees.
Exabeam setup cost is more budget-friendly, while Splunk SOAR may require a larger upfront investment. Users often find Exabeam's pricing more accessible compared to Splunk SOAR's costlier implementation fees.
ThreatConnect TIP excels in threat data management and seamless deployment, appealing to those seeking effective threat intelligence solutions. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers robust automation features, catering to organizations prioritizing streamlined security operations through comprehensive security orchestration and customizable workflows.
ThreatConnect TIP requires higher setup costs, making it more suitable for larger budgets, while Splunk SOAR offers a more affordable setup, appealing to companies looking for budget-friendly solutions.
ThreatConnect TIP requires higher setup costs, making it more suitable for larger budgets, while Splunk SOAR offers a more affordable setup, appealing to companies looking for budget-friendly solutions.
Splunk SOAR, with robust integration and advanced threat detection, attracts larger enterprises. In comparison, Tines appeals to those seeking flexibility and ease, offering a low-code approach. Splunk's established support suits complex needs, while Tines's competitive pricing benefits smaller setups.
ServiceNow Security Operations integrates seamlessly with workflows, offering efficient incident response. In comparison, Splunk SOAR excels with customizable playbooks and flexible deployments. ServiceNow simplifies deployments with responsive support, while Splunk delivers adaptable setups and advanced automation, appealing to those with complex security needs.
ServiceNow Security Operations typically has higher setup costs compared to Splunk SOAR, which is known for more competitive pricing in initial deployment. While ServiceNow Security Operations offers extensive features, Splunk SOAR provides cost-effective solutions for setup.
ServiceNow Security Operations typically has higher setup costs compared to Splunk SOAR, which is known for more competitive pricing in initial deployment. While ServiceNow Security Operations offers extensive features, Splunk SOAR provides cost-effective solutions for setup.
Fortinet FortiSOAR appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its cost-effectiveness and responsive support. In comparison, Splunk SOAR attracts those seeking advanced automation, offering a comprehensive feature set and flexible deployment options, ideal for enterprises needing scalable solutions and detailed analytics.
Fortinet FortiSOAR setup cost is competitive, offering a cost-efficient integration, while Splunk SOAR presents a higher initial expense that reflects its comprehensive capabilities.
Fortinet FortiSOAR setup cost is competitive, offering a cost-efficient integration, while Splunk SOAR presents a higher initial expense that reflects its comprehensive capabilities.
Torq automates security workflows and incident responses, streamlining operations and enhancing threat detection. Users value its customizable workflows and seamless tool integration but note limitations in customization options. Performance issues during peak times and a steep learning curve require attention. Detailed documentation and a responsive support team enhance user experience.
Logpoint integrates robust log management and cost-effective dashboards. In comparison, Splunk SOAR excels in automation and diverse playbook offerings. Logpoint's fixed pricing suits those seeking predictable costs, while Splunk SOAR is ideal for organizations prioritizing customization and ROI-driven automation.
Swimlane offers simplicity and customization with user-friendly automation tools. In comparison, Splunk SOAR excels in advanced analytics and robust third-party integrations. Swimlane's ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness attract users, while Splunk SOAR appeals through its data handling capabilities and extensive integration options.
Swimlane offers a cost-effective setup compared to the higher initial expense associated with Splunk SOAR, highlighting the affordability of Swimlane while suggesting a more significant investment is needed for those opting for Splunk SOAR's comprehensive solution.
Swimlane offers a cost-effective setup compared to the higher initial expense associated with Splunk SOAR, highlighting the affordability of Swimlane while suggesting a more significant investment is needed for those opting for Splunk SOAR's comprehensive solution.
IBM Resilient excels in integration with QRadar, offering flexibility and customization for dynamic playbooks in incident response. In comparison, Splunk SOAR's strengths lie in flexible integration capabilities and mature automation modules, enhancing task efficiency and supporting diverse deployment models.
IBM Resilient has a higher setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, which offers a more economical entry point. Splunk SOAR attracts budget-conscious enterprises, whereas IBM Resilient may appeal to those prioritizing premium features associated with a higher investment.
IBM Resilient has a higher setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, which offers a more economical entry point. Splunk SOAR attracts budget-conscious enterprises, whereas IBM Resilient may appeal to those prioritizing premium features associated with a higher investment.
Google Security Operations, favored for seamless cloud-native security within Google Cloud environments, attracts cloud-focused organizations seeking easy integration and reduced costs. In comparison, Splunk SOAR appeals to businesses needing sophisticated automation and orchestration across multi-platform contexts, justifying its higher setup investment.
Google Security Operations involves lower setup costs, while Splunk SOAR tends to be more expensive to implement. Users may weigh these pricing strategies when comparing these industry-leading security solutions.
Google Security Operations involves lower setup costs, while Splunk SOAR tends to be more expensive to implement. Users may weigh these pricing strategies when comparing these industry-leading security solutions.
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator attracts buyers with its cost-effective centralized security management and strong support. In comparison, Splunk SOAR appeals with automated incident response and integration capabilities, making it a valuable investment for those seeking advanced analytics despite requiring specialized deployment expertise.
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is noted for its more affordable setup cost, providing a cost-effective solution for businesses. In contrast, Splunk SOAR's setup cost is significantly higher, reflecting its comprehensive suite of advanced security automation features.
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is noted for its more affordable setup cost, providing a cost-effective solution for businesses. In contrast, Splunk SOAR's setup cost is significantly higher, reflecting its comprehensive suite of advanced security automation features.
Splunk SOAR excels in automation efficiency, offering seamless integration and playbook execution. In comparison, Cyware Cyber Fusion focuses on collaborative incident response and real-time threat intelligence, appealing to those valuing enhanced team communication and a comprehensive security ecosystem.
InsightConnect excels in simplicity and automation, appealing to those who prioritize ease of use and integration flexibility. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers enhanced incident response through advanced analytics, making it ideal for those investing in comprehensive capabilities despite higher costs.
Rapid7 InsightConnect has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, highlighting affordability as a key differentiator. Splunk SOAR, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive solution that may justify its higher initial investment for some organizations.
Rapid7 InsightConnect has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, highlighting affordability as a key differentiator. Splunk SOAR, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive solution that may justify its higher initial investment for some organizations.
D3 Security offers cost-effective solutions with strong case management and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides extensive integration and analytics capabilities, justifying its higher price for tech buyers looking for advanced customization and a wide range of third-party integrations.
