Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Splunk SOAR Logo

Top 10 Splunk SOAR Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader
557 followers
Post review

Top Splunk SOAR Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk SOAR based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Sentinel, AWS Security Hub, and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk SOAR Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Splunk SOAR offers flexible integration and customizable playbooks, appealing to those requiring extensive automation. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel's seamless Microsoft integration and robust analytics through Kusto Query Language attracts users seeking comprehensive threat response and detailed security incident management.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Splunk SOAR has a high setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel is known for its lower initial expenses. The cost difference significantly impacts budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk SOAR has a high setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel is known for its lower initial expenses. The cost difference significantly impacts budget considerations.
Splunk SOAR Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR focuses on automation and flexibility, appealing to environments needing robust playbook development. In comparison, AWS Security Hub is geared towards AWS-centric environments, offering security management and real-time alerts. Splunk SOAR suits automation needs, while AWS Security Hub provides seamless AWS integration.
Download AWS Security Hub vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Splunk SOAR may have a higher setup cost compared to AWS Security Hub, highlighting potential budget considerations for enterprises seeking a cost-effective solution for integrating and analyzing security data across platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk SOAR may have a higher setup cost compared to AWS Security Hub, highlighting potential budget considerations for enterprises seeking a cost-effective solution for integrating and analyzing security data across platforms.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
4.2 out of 5
Cortex XSOAR excels in automation and a vast playbook repository, ideal for complex incident management with machine learning and scripting options. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides robust integration, flexible playbook development, and varied integrations, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive orchestration.
Download Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR setup cost is often praised for its simplicity, while Splunk SOAR is noted for its comprehensive pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR setup cost is often praised for its simplicity, while Splunk SOAR is noted for its comprehensive pricing.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Exabeam excels in user behavior analytics and simplicity, appealing to those valuing ease of use. In comparison, Splunk SOAR emphasizes flexible automation and integration, ideal for environments needing complex orchestration. Each offers distinct advantages in specific operational areas.
Download Exabeam vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Exabeam offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, whereas Splunk SOAR requires a higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, whereas Splunk SOAR requires a higher upfront investment.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
4.2 out of 5
ThreatConnect TIP excels with its detailed threat intelligence and customizable dashboards. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers robust automation and strong analytics. ThreatConnect TIP appeals with its transparent pricing, while Splunk SOAR's extensive features promise better ROI, despite initial costs.
Download Splunk SOAR vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) setup costs are perceived as significant, whereas Splunk SOAR's initial investment is generally viewed as more budget-friendly. This highlights a notable difference in initial financial commitment between the two solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) setup costs are perceived as significant, whereas Splunk SOAR's initial investment is generally viewed as more budget-friendly. This highlights a notable difference in initial financial commitment between the two solutions.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations
4.0 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations offers seamless incident response with comprehensive integration capabilities, appealing to those valuing ease and support. In comparison, Splunk SOAR, with its adaptability and robust feature set, attracts organizations needing extensive customization and versatile integration for complex environments.
Download ServiceNow Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR Report
ServiceNow Security Operations typically has higher setup costs compared to Splunk SOAR, which is known for more competitive pricing in initial deployment. While ServiceNow Security Operations offers extensive features, Splunk SOAR provides cost-effective solutions for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations typically has higher setup costs compared to Splunk SOAR, which is known for more competitive pricing in initial deployment. While ServiceNow Security Operations offers extensive features, Splunk SOAR provides cost-effective solutions for setup.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiSOAR offers user-friendly interfaces and diverse automation, appealing to those seeking ease of use and rapid deployment. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides advanced customization and robust features for tech buyers needing flexible, comprehensive solutions for detailed threat detection and response.
Download Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Fortinet FortiSOAR has higher setup costs, while Splunk SOAR offers more affordable initial pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiSOAR has higher setup costs, while Splunk SOAR offers more affordable initial pricing.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Tines
4.5 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Tines
4.5 out of 5
Splunk SOAR offers robust integrations and automation capabilities, appealing to enterprises requiring comprehensive security solutions. In comparison, Tines provides flexibility and ease of use, ideal for organizations seeking straightforward automation with rapid implementation and minimal complexity.
Download Splunk SOAR vs. Tines Report
Splunk SOAR requires significant initial setup investment, while Tines offers a more straightforward setup process, highlighting a key difference in the cost and complexity of implementation between these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk SOAR requires significant initial setup investment, while Tines offers a more straightforward setup process, highlighting a key difference in the cost and complexity of implementation between these two solutions.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
LogPoint focuses on cost-effective log management with integrated SIEM and SOAR features suitable for organizations with stable logging needs. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers extensive automation and integration capabilities, appealing to those seeking flexibility and advanced orchestration despite higher pricing.
Download Logpoint vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Logpoint offers a straightforward, cost-effective setup, while Splunk SOAR involves a higher initial investment but delivers extensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Logpoint offers a straightforward, cost-effective setup, while Splunk SOAR involves a higher initial investment but delivers extensive capabilities.
Splunk SOAR Logo
IBM Resilient
3.7 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
IBM Resilient
3.7 out of 5
IBM Resilient provides robust incident response with dynamic playbooks and strong IBM integration, suitable for complex deployments. In comparison, Splunk SOAR excels in automation and third-party integrations, appealing for flexibility. IBM Resilient may challenge initial setups, while Splunk SOAR focuses on automation efficiency.
Download IBM Resilient vs. Splunk SOAR Report
IBM Resilient has a lower initial setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Splunk SOAR incurs a higher initial investment, offering advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Resilient has a lower initial setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Splunk SOAR incurs a higher initial investment, offering advanced features.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Swimlane
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Swimlane
3.8 out of 5
Swimlane excels with flexibility, a streamlined deployment, and competitive pricing, appealing to those desiring cost-effectiveness and adaptability. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers comprehensive threat management and advanced intelligence, attracting buyers willing to invest in extensive functionalities and long-term security improvements.
Download Splunk SOAR vs. Swimlane Report
Swimlane has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, which can influence budget-conscious decisions, while Splunk SOAR offers extensive features that may justify its higher setup expense for those seeking comprehensive options.
View comparison
Pricing
Swimlane has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, which can influence budget-conscious decisions, while Splunk SOAR offers extensive features that may justify its higher setup expense for those seeking comprehensive options.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Torq
1 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Torq
1 out of 5
Torq automates security workflows and incident responses, streamlining operations and enhancing threat detection. Users value its customizable workflows and seamless tool integration but note limitations in customization options. Performance issues during peak times and a steep learning curve require attention. Detailed documentation and a responsive support team enhance user experience.
View comparison
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
4.0 out of 5
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator stands out for its cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment. In comparison, Splunk SOAR enhances its appeal with extensive integration capabilities and advanced automation, making it suitable for complex environments demanding comprehensive security management solutions.
Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR Report
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator incurs lower setup costs, while Splunk SOAR presents a more substantial initial investment, highlighting a key difference in affordability between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator incurs lower setup costs, while Splunk SOAR presents a more substantial initial investment, highlighting a key difference in affordability between the two solutions.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Google Security Operations
4.3 out of 5
Google Security Operations excels in integration with Google services, offering competitive pricing and ROI. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides robust automation and feature richness, with higher costs justified by its adaptability across security environments. Tech buyers may choose based on specific feature needs and existing ecosystems.
Download Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Google Security Operations has low initial setup costs, while Splunk SOAR is associated with higher deployment expenses. This difference highlights Google's cost-efficient entry point compared to Splunk's potentially more resource-intensive installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Security Operations has low initial setup costs, while Splunk SOAR is associated with higher deployment expenses. This difference highlights Google's cost-efficient entry point compared to Splunk's potentially more resource-intensive installation process.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Cyware Cyber Fusion
3.5 out of 5
Splunk SOAR excels in automation efficiency, offering seamless integration and playbook execution. In comparison, Cyware Cyber Fusion focuses on collaborative incident response and real-time threat intelligence, appealing to those valuing enhanced team communication and a comprehensive security ecosystem.
Download Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Splunk SOAR requires a moderate initial setup cost, whereas Cyware Cyber Fusion offers a lower entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk SOAR requires a moderate initial setup cost, whereas Cyware Cyber Fusion offers a lower entry point.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Rapid7 InsightConnect
4.0 out of 5
InsightConnect excels in simplicity and automation, appealing to those who prioritize ease of use and integration flexibility. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers enhanced incident response through advanced analytics, making it ideal for those investing in comprehensive capabilities despite higher costs.
Download Rapid7 InsightConnect vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Rapid7 InsightConnect has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, highlighting affordability as a key differentiator. Splunk SOAR, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive solution that may justify its higher initial investment for some organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 InsightConnect has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, highlighting affordability as a key differentiator. Splunk SOAR, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive solution that may justify its higher initial investment for some organizations.
Splunk SOAR Logo
D3 Security
4.5 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
D3 Security
4.5 out of 5
D3 Security offers cost-effective solutions with strong case management and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides extensive integration and analytics capabilities, justifying its higher price for tech buyers looking for advanced customization and a wide range of third-party integrations.
Download D3 Security vs. Splunk SOAR Report
D3 Security has a more straightforward setup process, while Splunk SOAR may involve higher initial costs and complexity.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
D3 Security has a more straightforward setup process, while Splunk SOAR may involve higher initial costs and complexity.
Splunk SOAR Logo
LogicHub SOAR+
4.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
LogicHub SOAR+
4.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR excels with its integration capabilities and automated playbooks for seamless responses. In comparison, LogicHub SOAR+ offers advanced machine learning and custom automation. Splunk's pricing appeals to budget-conscious buyers, whereas LogicHub's tailored solutions attract those needing specific threat handling.
Download LogicHub SOAR+ vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Splunk SOAR setup costs are higher, reflecting its comprehensive features, while LogicHub SOAR+ offers a more affordable setup, appealing to budget-conscious users seeking essential functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk SOAR setup costs are higher, reflecting its comprehensive features, while LogicHub SOAR+ offers a more affordable setup, appealing to budget-conscious users seeking essential functionalities.

Related categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Microsoft Security Suite