McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Splunk SOAR comparison

McAfee and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. McAfee is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. McAfee holds a 0.5% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Splunk’s 7.2% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of McAfee users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Read 40 McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator reviews

988 Views
222 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Splunk SOAR

Read 44 Splunk SOAR reviews

4,577 Views
2,761 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Splunk SOAR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Splunk SOAR are competing in the cybersecurity management category. Splunk SOAR has the upper hand due to its superior automation capabilities, despite McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator having more favorable pricing and support.

Features: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator offers centralized security management, robust policy enforcement, and compliance reporting capabilities. It provides centralized virus signatures and patch updates, easy-to-use console, and integrated reports for signature update status. Splunk SOAR is known for its advanced automation features, comprehensive playbook-driven responses, and seamless integration with other security tools. Its automation playbooks save analysts time, and it is user-friendly with a flexible integration framework.

Room for Improvement: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator could improve its user interface, scalability, and integration capabilities to match modern demands. Additionally, enhancing their customization options would broaden their usability. Splunk SOAR could benefit from simplifying its deployment process, expanding its pre-built integration options, and improving user accessibility for less technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator provides a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer service to ease technical challenges. Splunk SOAR offers strong support but highlights a more complex deployment model due to its extensive customization and integration options, requiring more technical expertise initially. McAfee’s simplicity contrasts with Splunk’s flexibility for advanced configurations.

Pricing and ROI: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is generally seen as more cost-effective with a high ROI due to its simpler pricing structure and efficiency. Splunk SOAR’s pricing reflects its sophisticated capabilities, with users deeming its long-term ROI significant due to enhanced automation and reduced manual interventions. McAfee's advantage lies in being budget-friendly, while Splunk offers premium features.

To learn more, read our detailed McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 844,944 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk SOAR

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is 0.5%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk SOAR is 7.2%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

DavidJones7

Head of Content at Pharmaflow

Offers automation alert features with easy integrations and impressive scalability

I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. There are a few technical challenges with the deployment, but it can easily solved by an experienced professional but not by a beginner user of the tool. The complete implementation and migration to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator will take around three months. If someone is using a software platform already with implemented use cases in their environment, it might be difficult to implement the same use cases when the customer is migrating to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. The conditions and prior alert settings needs to be accurate when migrating to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, otherwise false positive alerts might get generated.

Read full review

Shubham Sinha.

Senior Principal Information Security Analyst at Veritas Technologies LLC

Helped eliminate repetitive and redundant tasks, but custom functions and reporting need a lot of work

The visibility of the solution’s playbook viewer depends on the right you assign to the analyst. SOAR has the flexibility to distinguish between the roles of analyst and owner. If the analyst's role is to just work on a ticket, they cannot view the playbook design platform. That is limited to the owner. That can be both a good and bad thing. A major problem I have faced in SOAR's rights distribution is roles and responsibilities. Suppose I am initially granted user rights or analyst rights, but later on, I also get admin rights. SOAR is unable to amend the limitations of my role. I raised a support ticket with Splunk about this. They said it's a bug in their 5.3.5 version. To fix this, I had to reinstall the entire platform from scratch, just to amend the rights and responsibilities of one role. This bug was not fixed. Also, the latest GUI is terrible. The previous one was better. Another point is that while using Splunk SOAR in an investigation is not difficult, there are some complex parameters. We have SOAR case management, but the licensing is going to put a big hole in your pocket. Also, there is an issue with investigation node addition. When you are doing node additions you cannot grant the entire environment to have SOAR visibility into the incident. So when you integrate it with an ITSM tool, like ServiceNow or Jira for ticketing purposes, there is a challenge. When you do nodes for investigation on a regular basis, sometimes it does not update our ServiceNow platform, which is terrible. It is a redundant activity for an analyst to update that in the case management as well as in the ITSM tool. Although SOAR provides integration, the functionality of investigation and nodes is terrible when it comes to integration. An additional area for improvement is custom function creation. It's terrible. A newbie cannot create custom functions right away. They would require a solid understanding first. Also, the reporting is really awful. If I want to do a report for a customized time period, such as the last three days or the last four days, or from the 10th to the 12th of June, that is not available in SOAR at all. That kind of feature is available in Cortex XSOAR. Reporting is a real challenge.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Application control and traffic encryption are the most valuable features."

"The policy auditing, policy management, and device auditing are all valuable features. Our customers appreciated the ability to get alerts to system-wide events from a single view."

"The DLP feature in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is good."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator's performance is good."

"McAfee is helping us to clean all of the viruses from the machines, protecting our desktops from the latest threats."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has a built-in advanced pattern, which is very useful because it can detect any pattern."

"The security is a key feature and the console is very user friendly."

"The best part is management in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pros

"The best feature is the integration and the custom Python code that we can write. Splunk SOAR provides us with both of these capabilities, allowing us to integrate different security solutions with Splunk SOAR and take remediation actions directly on those security tools."

"SOAR allows custom code to be written and integrates with various technologies through pre-built apps like Windows Remote Management or custom apps we can build ourselves like a secret retrieval app from our vault."

"Very flexible integration with other tools"

"The most valuable features of Splunk SOAR are the easy integration with other solutions, including other Splunk solutions. The most important playbooks we need on the market come already on the Frontend. However, nowadays, Splunk changed its name, it's not Frontend anymore, it's Splunk Store. This is a very strong point."

"The ability to automate Splunk SOAR and customize the playbook use cases is the most valuable feature and is very exciting for me."

"Our customers find it easy to conduct searches and consider it an excellent content management system."

"The most valuable feature of Splunk SOAR is the automated playbooks, which saves analysts time."

"The solution allows us to customize playbooks and incorporate custom code, allowing us to drag and drop elements while still writing code to build the integrations we need."

More Splunk SOAR pros

Cons

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator needs to upgrade its technology since the solution's EDR function is not good compared to other vendors in the market."

"They have to do something to make the solution more resilient or recoverable from power failure events, which may include creating their own database."

"We would like to see more integration with different platforms and extend this to other platforms. We are migrating to the cloud and want to extend it from our on-premises setup to the cloud."

"It would be highly beneficial if the metrics or dashboards could be customized"

"The way that ePolicy launches the updates is very slow. It would be great if that was faster."

"Sometimes agents hang. We have to reinstall the agents."

"There is a problem when it comes to agent communication and duplicate records, where the rebooting of a machine leads to the installation of a new agent and you get a lot of duplicate records that ultimately affect your compliance monitoring."

"The solution is difficult to tune to avoid false positives."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator cons

"SOAR is probably the most unreliable product Splunk has and that's because most of it is content driven from what you put into it. There are certain parts of it that have a little bit of difficulty at volume too. It's always changing. There is new stuff coming out for it that's going to make it a little bit better, but it does have some drawbacks."

"The font used in the interface could be changed and made easier to read."

"The creation of playbooks is complex in Splunk SOAR, and the number of integrations needs enhancement. Although it enhances alert handling, it still has a journey to compete with Palo Alto SOAR and FortiSOAR."

"Providing Splunk app developers and playbook developers Python Stub files so that way when they create custom code through their IDE, they can have IntelliCode suggestions."

"In the beginning, we couldn't find any specific documents for every function. It wasn't easy to navigate to what we needed."

"The cost of Splunk SOAR has room for improvement."

"I haven't had any issues with the solution so far."

"We want to see improvements made to the APIs such that we can connect to many different systems and data sources."

More Splunk SOAR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is not an expensive solution."

"For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive."

"It is attractively priced. It is a fraction of what we're going to pay for CrowdStrike or SentinelOne, but it only has a fraction of the capabilities as well."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is a cheaply priced product, meaning it is not expensive since McAfee provides a free version of ePO, which includes phone support as well."

"McAfee tries to package different things into different products, then sell them as different products with different licenses. They just split everything up into multiple things. That's just their sales pitch and how they do it."

"$The price of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is expensive, it is approximately $6,000 to $9,000 per license annually."

"This solution is priced in the mid-range."

"It's an expensive solution"

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

"We renewed it this year. This year was the first time there was a dramatic increase in the price. It was kind of non-negotiable. It was just a high increase. We had internal communications, and it was definitely a surprise to us. In a short time frame, we renewed it this year. Prices are going up everywhere, but they are not always justifiable, at least not to our eyes. The pricing this year was definitely a big shock."

"Splunk SOAR is an expensive solution for an organization of our size."

"It's very overpriced because it is based on the number of users. There is no bulk licensing."

"The cost is high and the licensing is on an annual basis."

"The tool is not cheap."

"I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."

"While I can't confirm the exact pricing, some colleagues have mentioned that Splunk SOAR may be on the costlier side."

"In my opinion, the price is high, but if you want good products, you have to be willing to pay for them."

More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator network security software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mcafee's ePolicy O...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION ePO?

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator's performance is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION ePO?

It's an expensive solution.

See all answers

What do you like most about Splunk Phantom?

Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?

Splunk SOAR is affordable cost-wise only, but not competitive from a technical perspective compared to Palo Alto SOAR and FortiSOAR.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?

The creation of playbooks is complex in Splunk SOAR ( /categories/security-orchestration-automation-and-response-soar ), and the number of integrations needs enhancement. Although it enhances alert...

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 52% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 48% of the time

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Competitors

Cortex XSIAM vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 25% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 19% of the time

Tines vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 9% of the time

Torq vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 8% of the time

More Splunk SOAR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

March 2025

Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR

March 2025

Download Splunk SOAR product report

Also Known As

McAfee ePO, ePolicy Orchestrator, Intel Security ePolicy Orchestrator, McAfee MVISION ePO

Phantom

Overview

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (McAfee ePO) is the most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, McAfee ePO makes risk and compliance management simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.

McAfee

Splunk SOAR offers features like automation and orchestration of manual tasks, speeding up work, detection and response to advanced and emerging threats.

Go from overwhelmed to in-control

Automate manual tasks. Address every alert, every day. Establish repeatable procedures that allow security analysts to stop being reactive and focus on mission-critical objectives to protect your business.

Force multiply your team

Orchestrate and automate repetitive tasks, investigation and response to increase efficiency and productivity, and do more with the people you already have. Make a team of three feel like a team of 10.

From 30 minutes to 30 seconds

Work faster with Splunk SOAR. Respond to threats in seconds. Lower your mean time to respond (MTTR) by automating security tasks and workflows across all of your security tools.

End-to-end security operations made easy

Take advantage of Splunk Enterprise Security and Splunk SOAR joining forces to provide a seamless and intuitive SecOps platform to prevent, detect and respond to advanced and emerging threats.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Brelje & Race, Cognizant, Sutherland Global Services, Eagle Rock Energy, Arab National Bank, Bank Central Asia, Kleberg Bank, Leading Mexican Bank, SF Police Credit Union, Macquarie Telecom, Seagate Technology, Blackburn & Darwen Council, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, IRCEP, Major U.S. State Government, State of Alaska, State of Colorado, Cemex, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke

Recorded Future, Blackstone

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR

March 2025

Free Report: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR

Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.