McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Splunk SOAR comparison

McAfee and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. McAfee is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. McAfee holds a 0.6% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Splunk’s 7.2% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of McAfee users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Read 40 McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator reviews

1,135 Views
253 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Splunk SOAR

Read 43 Splunk SOAR reviews

4,898 Views
2,961 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Splunk SOAR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 8, 2024

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Splunk SOAR are competitive products in the cybersecurity space. Splunk SOAR generally has an advantage due to its advanced features and perceived value.

Features: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is known for its centralized management capability which facilitates streamlined operations across various endpoints, easy deployment of agents, and a user-friendly console. Splunk SOAR offers advanced orchestration and automation capabilities, excellent integration with other security tools, and customizable playbooks which enhance its versatility and comprehensiveness.

Room for Improvement: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator could improve scalability, adapt to more flexible deployment models, and enhance its reporting engine. Splunk SOAR could benefit from simplification of its setup procedure, better pricing structures to align with smaller budgets, and more intuitive playbook creation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator offers straightforward deployment but lacks flexibility. Its customer service is decent but not as extensive as desired. Splunk SOAR is recognized for its flexible deployment options and responsive customer service that enhances its integration process.

Pricing and ROI: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is cost-effective with lower setup expenses, offering significant initial savings. Splunk SOAR requires a larger initial investment but typically provides a higher ROI due to its superior functionalities and long-term benefits, even though its upfront cost is higher.

To learn more, read our detailed McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk SOAR

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is 0.6%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk SOAR is 7.2%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

DavidJones7

Head of Content at Pharmaflow

Offers automation alert features with easy integrations and impressive scalability

I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. There are a few technical challenges with the deployment, but it can easily solved by an experienced professional but not by a beginner user of the tool. The complete implementation and migration to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator will take around three months. If someone is using a software platform already with implemented use cases in their environment, it might be difficult to implement the same use cases when the customer is migrating to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. The conditions and prior alert settings needs to be accurate when migrating to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, otherwise false positive alerts might get generated.

Read full review

Shubham Sinha.

Senior Principal Information Security Analyst at Veritas Technologies LLC

Helped eliminate repetitive and redundant tasks, but custom functions and reporting need a lot of work

The visibility of the solution’s playbook viewer depends on the right you assign to the analyst. SOAR has the flexibility to distinguish between the roles of analyst and owner. If the analyst's role is to just work on a ticket, they cannot view the playbook design platform. That is limited to the owner. That can be both a good and bad thing. A major problem I have faced in SOAR's rights distribution is roles and responsibilities. Suppose I am initially granted user rights or analyst rights, but later on, I also get admin rights. SOAR is unable to amend the limitations of my role. I raised a support ticket with Splunk about this. They said it's a bug in their 5.3.5 version. To fix this, I had to reinstall the entire platform from scratch, just to amend the rights and responsibilities of one role. This bug was not fixed. Also, the latest GUI is terrible. The previous one was better. Another point is that while using Splunk SOAR in an investigation is not difficult, there are some complex parameters. We have SOAR case management, but the licensing is going to put a big hole in your pocket. Also, there is an issue with investigation node addition. When you are doing node additions you cannot grant the entire environment to have SOAR visibility into the incident. So when you integrate it with an ITSM tool, like ServiceNow or Jira for ticketing purposes, there is a challenge. When you do nodes for investigation on a regular basis, sometimes it does not update our ServiceNow platform, which is terrible. It is a redundant activity for an analyst to update that in the case management as well as in the ITSM tool. Although SOAR provides integration, the functionality of investigation and nodes is terrible when it comes to integration. An additional area for improvement is custom function creation. It's terrible. A newbie cannot create custom functions right away. They would require a solid understanding first. Also, the reporting is really awful. If I want to do a report for a customized time period, such as the last three days or the last four days, or from the 10th to the 12th of June, that is not available in SOAR at all. That kind of feature is available in Cortex XSOAR. Reporting is a real challenge.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The policy auditing, policy management, and device auditing are all valuable features. Our customers appreciated the ability to get alerts to system-wide events from a single view."

"Application control and traffic encryption are the most valuable features."

"It is a scalable solution...I rate its scalability a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the central management console, which is used for DLP, endpoint security, drive encryption, and application control."

"The most valuable feature of the McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is agent communication."

"Technical support is very helpful."

"The most valuable features of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator are the easy-to-use console, and lots of reports, such as customized reports and inventory reports. Additionally, overall the centralized management is very good where you can see the compliance levels and inventory."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its general purpose of protecting our endpoints from infections, malicious files, and all those kinds of things. The fact that there are organized policies and policy inheritance. The general management."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pros

"It's pretty easy when it comes to setting up assets. If you want to fetch emails or call a REST API, you can set up an asset and grab that information."

"I have found all the security automation platform features of Splunk SOAR to be good. The Automation playbook development is highly useful."

"The product provides 100% automation for certain processes."

"The most valuable feature is the risk-based access control."

"The product’s integration with other Splunk products is valuable."

"Its ability to integrate with other systems and applications in our environment is pretty easy. Sometimes if we see any complexity we try to involve a consultant to help us. Everything is through the built-in app. Splunk can connect to any assets through the built-in app. It could be in a platform, firewalls, or endpoints. It's easy if it's an app integration."

"Surprisingly, the mobile app is valuable because it is very convenient for our on-call analysts to respond and get alerted to security alerts and events wherever they are. We are able to harness the power of Splunk SOAR and everything that we are doing, and we are also able to alert our on-call analysts 24/7. From their mobile phone, they can respond to those alerts."

"The ability to automate Splunk SOAR and customize the playbook use cases is the most valuable feature and is very exciting for me."

More Splunk SOAR pros

Cons

"McAfee should improve in terms of customer support and assigning a knowledgeable TAM to customers."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator could improve by supporting container microservices, such as Docker and Kubernetes."

"There is a problem when it comes to agent communication and duplicate records, where the rebooting of a machine leads to the installation of a new agent and you get a lot of duplicate records that ultimately affect your compliance monitoring."

"There needs to be support for Mac computers. Currently, McAfee does not work on iOS."

"Lacks a single plug-in for multiple uses."

"It would be highly beneficial if the metrics or dashboards could be customized"

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator support has been helpful. However, sometimes when I raise the case they take a while to answer. For example, the last time I used them it took them two weeks to reply back by email. No one has contacted me back since. They should improve their service."

"It's a little bit complex to configure it, but when you start using it, it is much easier. There are many policies that you need to create, and in three or four places"

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator cons

"And most of the challenges that I have faced with the solution can be found in the documentation itself."

"We want to see improvements made to the APIs such that we can connect to many different systems and data sources."

"It would be ideal for us if Splunk SOAR could integrate with Teams."

"Portability is one thing that is currently lacking. The open-source product that I evaluated had portability. It would require a lot of development effort, but it will save the cost of rewriting all the playbooks."

"In my opinion, the focus should be on improving its simplicity, specifically the interface, and configuration."

"Splunk SOAR can improve IoT/OT security-related case studies or your use cases. Their integration with identity and access management (IAM) solutions is a bit shaky. They don't have good integration with a lot of IAM solutions. They do have good capability in terms of user access management internally, but even with privileged user access, they have a good module. However, if they have to integrate with solutions, such as CyberArk or IBM IAM solutions they are lacking, the visibility of user access is not that much."

"SOAR is probably the most unreliable product Splunk has and that's because most of it is content driven from what you put into it. There are certain parts of it that have a little bit of difficulty at volume too. It's always changing. There is new stuff coming out for it that's going to make it a little bit better, but it does have some drawbacks."

"It could be easier to implement."

More Splunk SOAR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"$The price of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is expensive, it is approximately $6,000 to $9,000 per license annually."

"McAfee tries to package different things into different products, then sell them as different products with different licenses. They just split everything up into multiple things. That's just their sales pitch and how they do it."

"For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive."

"Compared to other Antivirus products, the cost of this solution is a bit high."

"It's an expensive solution"

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is not an expensive solution."

"This solution is priced in the mid-range."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

"While I can't confirm the exact pricing, some colleagues have mentioned that Splunk SOAR may be on the costlier side."

"Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all the functions and tie together the data. It's the perfect tool for our needs."

"I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."

"Splunk SOAR is more expensive compared to other options for SOAR."

"Splunk SOAR is an expensive solution for an organization of our size."

"The cost is high and the licensing is on an annual basis."

"The licensing cost is reasonable."

"The tool is not cheap."

More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator network security software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mcafee's ePolicy O...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator?

I like the solution's feasibility. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is also better and easier to use than other ePOs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator?

The installation process is quite difficult and requires technical support.

See all answers

What do you like most about Splunk Phantom?

Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?

I rate Splunk SOAR two out of 10 for affordability. Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?

The dashboard could be improved and some other features. SOAR should integrate network capabilities, allowing us to also monitor the WLAN network. Splunk is also expensive and difficult for beginne...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Sentinel vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 29% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 27% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 22% of the time

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Competitors

Cortex XSIAM vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 26% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 18% of the time

Tines vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 9% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 1% of the time

More Splunk SOAR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

February 2025

Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR

February 2025

Download Splunk SOAR product report

Also Known As

McAfee ePO, ePolicy Orchestrator, Intel Security ePolicy Orchestrator, McAfee MVISION ePO

Phantom

Overview

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (McAfee ePO) is the most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, McAfee ePO makes risk and compliance management simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.

McAfee

Splunk SOAR offers features like automation and orchestration of manual tasks, speeding up work, detection and response to advanced and emerging threats.

Go from overwhelmed to in-control

Automate manual tasks. Address every alert, every day. Establish repeatable procedures that allow security analysts to stop being reactive and focus on mission-critical objectives to protect your business.

Force multiply your team

Orchestrate and automate repetitive tasks, investigation and response to increase efficiency and productivity, and do more with the people you already have. Make a team of three feel like a team of 10.

From 30 minutes to 30 seconds

Work faster with Splunk SOAR. Respond to threats in seconds. Lower your mean time to respond (MTTR) by automating security tasks and workflows across all of your security tools.

End-to-end security operations made easy

Take advantage of Splunk Enterprise Security and Splunk SOAR joining forces to provide a seamless and intuitive SecOps platform to prevent, detect and respond to advanced and emerging threats.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Brelje & Race, Cognizant, Sutherland Global Services, Eagle Rock Energy, Arab National Bank, Bank Central Asia, Kleberg Bank, Leading Mexican Bank, SF Police Credit Union, Macquarie Telecom, Seagate Technology, Blackburn & Darwen Council, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, IRCEP, Major U.S. State Government, State of Alaska, State of Colorado, Cemex, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke

Recorded Future, Blackstone

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR

January 2025

Free Report: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR

Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.