Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo

Top 10 McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Alternatives

Vendor: McAfee
4.0 out of 5
610 followers
Post review

Top McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Sentinel, Elastic Security, and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

McAfee Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with McAfee, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator appeals with centralized management and customizable policies. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel excels with cloud-native deployment and powerful analytics. McAfee suits on-premises needs, while Microsoft offers scalable cloud solutions, appealing to organizations focused on innovative security technologies.
Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator involves a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel, which is known for its more cost-effective setup process, offering an affordable solution for businesses with limited budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator involves a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel, which is known for its more cost-effective setup process, offering an affordable solution for businesses with limited budgets.
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator focuses on centralized management, enhancing control across devices. In comparison, Elastic Security emphasizes advanced threat detection with strong data analysis capabilities. McAfee's setup is user-friendly, while Elastic requires more configuration but offers greater flexibility.
Download Elastic Security vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Report
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator incurs higher setup costs compared to Elastic Security, which offers more economical initial setup pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator incurs higher setup costs compared to Elastic Security, which offers more economical initial setup pricing.
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
4.2 out of 5
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator appeals with its cost-effective endpoint management and seamless integration with McAfee solutions. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR attracts tech buyers seeking advanced automation and incident response capabilities, offering substantial ROI despite higher initial costs.
Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Report
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a key difference in initial investment requirements for these cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a key difference in initial investment requirements for these cybersecurity solutions.
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
Splunk SOAR
4.1 out of 5
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
Splunk SOAR
4.1 out of 5
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator stands out for its cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment. In comparison, Splunk SOAR enhances its appeal with extensive integration capabilities and advanced automation, making it suitable for complex environments demanding comprehensive security management solutions.
Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR Report
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator incurs lower setup costs, while Splunk SOAR presents a more substantial initial investment, highlighting a key difference in affordability between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator incurs lower setup costs, while Splunk SOAR presents a more substantial initial investment, highlighting a key difference in affordability between the two solutions.
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is favored for its robust centralized security management and straightforward deployment with competitive pricing. In comparison, Exabeam offers advanced analytics and superior threat detection, appealing to organizations prioritizing predictive analytics and tailored deployment despite higher costs.
Download Exabeam vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Report
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has a higher setup cost than Exabeam. Exabeam offers a more budget-friendly option with its lower initial expenses, while McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator may require a more significant upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has a higher setup cost than Exabeam. Exabeam offers a more budget-friendly option with its lower initial expenses, while McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator may require a more significant upfront investment.

Related categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Microsoft Security Suite