Splunk SOAR vs Swimlane comparison

Read 10 Swimlane reviews

1,375 Views
1,306 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Splunk SOAR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Swimlane and Splunk SOAR are competing in the security orchestration, automation, and response category. Swimlane provides a more attractive pricing model and customer support, whereas Splunk SOAR excels with a comprehensive functionality set, offering a compelling choice for those seeking robust capabilities.

Features: Swimlane focuses on customization ease, flexible automation processes, and security operation environments. Splunk SOAR is notable for advanced machine learning, extensive integrations, and sophisticated toolsets suited for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Swimlane could enhance its AI capabilities and include more advanced threat detection features. It can also benefit from a richer integration ecosystem and greater scalability. Splunk SOAR may improve user interface simplicity, require less training time, and reduce initial setup complexity to be more user-friendly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Swimlane offers an easy deployment process augmented by excellent technical assistance, making integration within existing infrastructures smooth. Splunk SOAR, while providing reliable customer service, requires a more intricate initial setup due to its advanced features, necessitating an extended deployment period.

Pricing and ROI: Swimlane has lower setup costs and provides quicker returns on investment due to its economical pricing structure. Splunk SOAR, although higher in initial cost, justifies the expense with a significant potential ROI, attributed to its extensive feature capabilities and integration options.

To learn more, read our detailed Splunk SOAR vs. Swimlane Report (Updated: December 2025).

Splunk SOAR vs. Swimlane

Download the complete report

Helped 879,443 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Splunk SOAR

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Swimlane

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Powered Security Automation (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Splunk SOAR is 7.8%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Swimlane is 3.0%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk SOAR	7.8%
Swimlane	3.0%
Other	89.2%

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

Shiboo Suren

Manager cybersecurity at Hexion Inc.

Automates threat response and reduces investigation time but needs better threat intelligence integration

One thing that we would like to see with Splunk SOAR is the expandability to the threat intelligence feed. Currently, we have limited ingestion to the threat intelligence feed for the correlation purpose. We would like to see it being integrated, with license cost or without license cost, to leading threat intelligence sources such as Recorded Future, Feedly, or Flare. That is something we would appreciate having integrated. The second thing on the improvement side is about exposed credential-related information. If we start ingesting those data to Splunk SOAR or SIEM with some sort of integration with threat intelligence feed, that will also improve our detection and prediction method or help us with the investigation.

Read full review

MoumitaDas

Software Engineer III at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Task persistence and integration ease have been key benefits

The best part of Swimlane is the persistent notifications and its ease of integration, requiring minimal coding. While it lacks response features, it can be integrated with messaging or queue services to achieve this. Any incident response requires additional integration since Swimlane itself doesn't react to incidents. Real-time data in terms of persistence is configurable, and without config, tasks persist indefinitely until completion. If using Appian versions below 11, integration features for Swimlane aren't available. By default, Swimlane lacks built-in intelligence, needing coding for integration. Although the Swimlane is beneficial and reduces manpower requirements, it's hindered by its lack of exposure. If exposed through services or endpoints, its functionality could be accessed without needing a local standalone application. On a scale of one to ten, this solution deserves a rating of nine.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature is the integration and the custom Python code that we can write. Splunk SOAR provides us with both of these capabilities, allowing us to integrate different security solutions with Splunk SOAR and take remediation actions directly on those security tools."

"Our customers find it easy to conduct searches and consider it an excellent content management system."

"Splunk integrates with so many products. It provides us with good information for us to be able to do our jobs."

"Workflow management is most valuable. It is easily customizable"

"The most valuable feature is the API connector, depending on how it's formatted and who made the actual app offering for it. The REST API is my favorite component. It's very easy to use. The filters are also really valuable. Those are the two primary features but I enjoy using the rest of it."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the playbook automation just because it allows us to reduce the manual actions that SOC has to handle."

"I like the way Splunk interacts with various systems via the API. The ability to integrate Splunk with our ticketing system has been an immense help because we can maintain our workflow while blending Splunk with our support desk and other ways that we track work."

"The customization continues to be excellent."

More Splunk SOAR pros

"On a scale of one to ten, this solution deserves a rating of nine."

"The technical support from Swimlane is very good."

"Swimlane is a very effective way to represent workflows involving multiple users."

"Swimlane saves us 80 to 90 percent of our time by quickly helping us design the journey and efficiently passing information to various components."

"The biggest advantage of Swimlane for us is that it saves time, which in turn helps us in cost-saving."

"Our primary goal was to reduce analyst time, and we have been successful in that."

"Swimlane enables two SOC analysts to work efficiently as much as ten analysts would without Swimlane, which translates to significant manpower savings."

"It provides us with a single portal for our logs from different solutions."

More Swimlane pros

Cons

"I'm not an expert on Splunk SOAR, but I'm sure our team members know what areas could be improved."

"The algorithm and machine learning have room for improvement and can be more user-friendly."

"In the beginning, we couldn't find any specific documents for every function. It wasn't easy to navigate to what we needed."

"It would be ideal for us if Splunk SOAR could integrate with Teams."

"They can improve on what they are currently doing. They can provide more playbooks or at least template playbooks that are in their repository."

"They should integrate Splunk Enterprise Security better into Splunk Cloud."

"Splunk SOAR does not help me reduce my security event volume; in fact, it makes them massive."

"Splunk's support for integration is subpar and has room for improvement."

More Splunk SOAR cons

"We faced a lot of issues with the product’s stability."

"There is a need for enhanced version control in Swimlane. Currently, our version does not support it, making it tough to move changes between environments during significant updates."

"I would prefer to have more colors added to represent different risks or notations, which can be used for the prioritization of risks and the significance of information."

"The stability of the solution has room for improvement."

"Swimlane's search bar is not working effectively, and there is no option to differentiate between two cases at the same time."

"One of the disadvantages of Swimlane is that to manage the platform, we need hardcore developers."

"The initial setup and deployment are complex."

"I would like to see improvements in the minor bugs that occur with each update, as some features might have issues."

More Swimlane cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I found the price of Splunk SOAR to be good."

"While I can't confirm the exact pricing, some colleagues have mentioned that Splunk SOAR may be on the costlier side."

"The licensing cost is reasonable."

"We renewed it this year. This year was the first time there was a dramatic increase in the price. It was kind of non-negotiable. It was just a high increase. We had internal communications, and it was definitely a surprise to us. In a short time frame, we renewed it this year. Prices are going up everywhere, but they are not always justifiable, at least not to our eyes. The pricing this year was definitely a big shock."

"It's very overpriced because it is based on the number of users. There is no bulk licensing."

"Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all the functions and tie together the data. It's the perfect tool for our needs."

"Splunk SOAR is moderately priced, neither cheap nor overly expensive."

"When we first purchased our Splunk SOAR license, it was based on an event-count model. It was based on the number of events. I had strong opinions at the time that automation should not be stifled by the amount of automation you can accomplish, so the previous structure was not as beneficial for us. Later that year, we got told or saw at a conference that they announced user-based pricing. We are now in a renewal period, so we migrated to a user-based license model, which is more appropriate for us so that we no longer have to worry about stifling our automation based on the quantity."

More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	31

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Splunk Phantom?

Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?

I am familiar with the pricing aspect, setup cost, and licensing cost of Splunk SOAR, and it is pretty much similar to what industries are offering these days. We never had any issue when we had to...

What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?

The visibility of Splunk SOAR's playbook viewer is rather unclear to me; I wonder what the visibility is for. There are indeed some problems with integrating Splunk SOAR with other Splunk products ...

What needs improvement with Swimlane?

One of the disadvantages of Swimlane is that to manage the platform, we need hardcore developers. We have recently seen new products such as Tines and Blink Ops coming into the market, where a pers...

What is your primary use case for Swimlane?

We are using Swimlane for automation purposes and security orchestration. We are using Swimlane's Playbook Automation. One of the major playbooks that we use in Swimlane is for phishing email autom...

What advice do you have for others considering Swimlane?

I would rate Swimlane a seven out of ten as a product.

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 12% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 9% of the time

Tines vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 8% of the time

Exabeam vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 2% of the time

More Splunk SOAR Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 21% of the time

Tines vs Swimlane

Compared 16% of the time

Torq vs Swimlane

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Swimlane

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 5% of the time

More Swimlane Competitors

Product Reports

Splunk SOAR

Download Splunk SOAR product report

Download Swimlane product report

Also Known As

Phantom

No data available

Overview

Splunk SOAR offers features like automation and orchestration of manual tasks, speeding up work, detection and response to advanced and emerging threats.

Go from overwhelmed to in-control

Automate manual tasks. Address every alert, every day. Establish repeatable procedures that allow security analysts to stop being reactive and focus on mission-critical objectives to protect your business.

Force multiply your team

Orchestrate and automate repetitive tasks, investigation and response to increase efficiency and productivity, and do more with the people you already have. Make a team of three feel like a team of 10.

From 30 minutes to 30 seconds

Work faster with Splunk SOAR. Respond to threats in seconds. Lower your mean time to respond (MTTR) by automating security tasks and workflows across all of your security tools.

End-to-end security operations made easy

Take advantage of Splunk Enterprise Security and Splunk SOAR joining forces to provide a seamless and intuitive SecOps platform to prevent, detect and respond to advanced and emerging threats.

Splunk

Swimlane is a leader in security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR). By automating time-intensive, manual processes and operational workflows and delivering powerful, consolidated analytics, real time dashboards and reporting from across your security infrastructure, Swimlane maximizes the incident response capabilities of over-burdened and understaffed security operations.

Swimlane was founded to deliver scalable innovative and flexible security solutions to organizations struggling with alert fatigue, vendor proliferation and chronic staffing shortages. Swimlane is at the forefront of the growing market for security automation and orchestration solutions that automate and organize security processes in repeatable ways to get the most out of available resources and accelerate incident response.

Sample Customers

Recorded Future, Blackstone

LinkedIn, TransUnion, Citrix, Aetna, Perspecta

Splunk SOAR vs. Swimlane