HashiCorp Nomad vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform comparison

HashiCorp and Red Hat are both solutions in the Container Management category. HashiCorp is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Red Hat is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5. HashiCorp holds a 3.0% mindshare in CM, compared to Red Hat’s 31.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of HashiCorp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

HashiCorp Nomad

Read 2 HashiCorp Nomad reviews

1,093 Views
863 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Read 48 Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform reviews

10,269 Views
8,418 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

HashiCorp Nomad

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

HashiCorp Nomad and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform compete in container orchestration. HashiCorp Nomad has an advantage in pricing and support, whereas Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform offers superior features.

Features: HashiCorp Nomad provides simplicity and robust orchestration across diverse environments, noted for its flexibility and ease of use in mixed workloads. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform offers a comprehensive feature set with enhanced security, integrated developer tools, and broader ecosystem support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform provides streamlined deployment with extensive documentation and enterprise-level support. HashiCorp Nomad offers flexible deployment due to its simpler architecture but has limited support channels.

Pricing and ROI: HashiCorp Nomad offers lower initial setup and ongoing costs, making it cost-effective for organizations optimizing ROI. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform requires higher initial investment but offers good long-term value with its extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed HashiCorp Nomad vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

HashiCorp Nomad vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

HashiCorp Nomad

Ranking in Container Management

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Ranking in Container Management

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of HashiCorp Nomad is 3.0%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is 31.4%, up from 26.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Zeeshan Akhtar

Full stack developer at VMware

Has out of the box features , which is good for companies that don't want to spend too much time on research

I've noticed a few UI issues. For example, when monitoring services and tasks, sometimes the tasks keep disconnecting. If you open the shell in HashiCorp Nomad using the exit button, it often disconnects, and you have to log in again. Sometimes, when I check the logs in the UI for microservices tasks, I encounter an issue where the logs are not visible. However, if I log in again after some time, refresh the page, or check a different container, the logs usually appear. These logs are being generated, as I can see them being shipped to my LogView. I'm not sure if this is a product issue or something related to our deployment, but I've noticed it.

Read full review

Vlado Velkovski

DevOps Architect at KIBS

Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime

OpenShift has a pretty steep learning curve. It's not an easy tool to use. It's not only OpenShift but Kubernetes itself. The good thing is that Red Hat provides specific targeted training. There are five or six pieces of training where you can get certifications. The licenses for OpenShift are pretty expensive, so they could be cheaper because the competition isn't sleeping, and Red Hat must take that into account. There are a few versions of OpenShift. There is the normal OpenShift and an OpenShift Plus license. Red Hat could think of how to connect those two subscriptions because, with Red Hat Plus, you have one tool called ACM (Advanced Cluster Management), where you can manage multiple clusters from one place. We deployed this functionality by ourselves, but if you don't pay the license for Red Hat OpenShift Plus, you'll lack this functionality. If you have a multi-cloud environment and you have a lot of work to do, it would be a plus if the Red Had OpenShift Plus license came in a bundle with the regular solutions. This ACM tool should be available in the normal subscription, not just the Plus version. There are new versions on an almost weekly basis. I found myself that the upgrading of OpenShift clusters is not a task that will successfully finish every time. It's a simple and quick, but not reliable process. That's why we use multiple clusters. We use v4.10.3, but we want to move to v4.12.X. The upgrade process itself can fail, and we don't have backups of our OpenShift cluster because we have backups of all the Kubernetes manifests on GitHub. We destroy the cluster, bring up a new one quickly, and apply those scripts. The upgrade itself could be more resilient for us as administrators of OpenShift to be sure that it'll succeed and not occasionally fail. They can improve the reliability of their upgrade process. They also have implementations of some Red Hat-verified operators for a lot of products like Elasticsearch. They're good enough for development purposes, but some of the OpenShift operators still lack resilient production-grade configurations. Red Hat says that we have a few hundred operators, but I believe that only half of them are production-grade ready at this moment. They need to work much more on those operators to become more flexible because you can deploy all of them in development mode, but when we go to production grade and want to make specific changes to the operator and configuration, we lack those possibilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You could get most of HashiCorp Nomad's features from other microservice orchestrators like Kubernetes. The tool's advantage is its ease of use and integration with services like Envoy. With Kubernetes, you must think about many things, like UI integration, which vault to use, and how to discover the service. With the tool, many things come out of the box, making it easy to start. For example, using the Ingress proxy with the tool is quite easy, while it's trickier with Kubernetes."

"If you face an issue with an image during deployment, the solution will automatically revert to the last stable image."

"They have built on top of Kubernetes. Most of the Kubernetes latest technology is already supported by the solution."

"The architecture is the best. The solution is scalable if you are on a container-based solution."

"The solution's security throughout the stack and the software supply chain is very reliable. When it was on-prem, it was by default secured by our company firewalls and security tools, and now it's in the cloud, which has its security and systems in place. This provides stability to our infrastructure."

"The software is user-friendly and straightforward to use, which is favorable to a developer."

"The usability and the developer experience. The platform has a centralized consultant that is easy to use for our development, operations and security teams."

"The best feature is the management for the port life cycle, which automatically recycles, pulls, and scales up and down based on needs and requests."

"The operating system has a live update and is more secure than any other. It's made for Atomic OS, a lightweight OS new to the market. I also like the source-to-image capabilities. The customer can directly deploy their applications from the repository. It's a highly flexible and easy way to deploy into production."

"It is very lightweight and can be deployed very fast, especially when it comes to containers."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pros

Cons

"It would be good to have a UI interface so that developers could receive notifications for jobs in a bad state."

"I've noticed a few UI issues. For example, when monitoring services and tasks, sometimes the tasks keep disconnecting. If you open the shell in HashiCorp Nomad using the exit button, it often disconnects, and you have to log in again. Sometimes, when I check the logs in the UI for microservices tasks, I encounter an issue where the logs are not visible. However, if I log in again after some time, refresh the page, or check a different container, the logs usually appear. These logs are being generated, as I can see them being shipped to my LogView. I'm not sure if this is a product issue or something related to our deployment, but I've noticed it."

"My impression is that this solution is pretty expensive so I think the pricing plan could improve."

"The product could benefit from additional operators and tools integrated with OpenShift."

"Container Platform could be improved if we could aggregate logs out of the box instead of having to do it through integrations with other products."

"It can take 10 to 15 minutes to deploy a microservice. The CI/CD process takes a long time, and if it's because of OCP, that is something that can be changed."

"There is room for improvement with integration."

"The product's interface is a bit buggy."

"OpenShift Container Platform needs to work on integrations."

"We are not big customers of Red Hat, but sometimes, we have severe bugs. We are very innovative, and sometimes, we have to wait for a long time to get proper attention. Red Hat should improve on that."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We paid for Cloud Pak for integration. It all depends on how many VMs or how many CPUs you are using. They do the licensing based on that."

"We have to pay for the license."

"It depends on who you're talking to. For a large corporation, it is acceptable, other than the significant infrastructure requirements. For a small organization, it is in no way suitable, and we'd go for Amazon's container solution."

"It largely depends on how much money they earn from the application being deployed; you don't normally deploy an app just for the purpose of having it. You must constantly look into your revenue and how much you spend every container, minute, or hour of how much it is working."

"The product pricing is competitive and structured around vCPU subscriptions, aligning with our application requirements."

"The product is expensive."

"Its price is a bit high because it's a premium product, but as long as the business is ready to pay for that, it's okay."

"The solution is expensive, and I rate it an eight out of ten. There is a subscription called OpenShift Plus, which offers additional features and products the vendor provides to complement the OpenShift Container Platform. These include ACM, Red Hat Quay, and Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HashiCorp Nomad?

Sometimes, the job is in a bad state, and we don't get any notifications. It would be good to have a UI interface so that developers could receive notifications for jobs in a bad state.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HashiCorp Nomad?

We use HashiCorp Nomad mainly to deploy our images in the form of jobs. It is also used for load balancing, containerization, and instance deployment.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering HashiCorp Nomad?

I would recommend HashiCorp Nomad to other users because it is the best tool for deployment. It is easy for a beginner to learn to use HashiCorp Nomad for the first time. Any developer with a decen...

See all answers

Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenShift Container Platform?

The tool's most valuable features include high availability, scalability, and security. Other features like advanced cluster management, advanced cluster security, and Red Hat Quay make it powerful...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenShift Container Platform?

OpenShift pricing varies by region. For example, a simple cluster with three nodes in DAL-10 might cost around $560 to $580 per month, subject to specific configurations like memory and CPU cores.

See all answers

Comparisons

Rancher Labs vs HashiCorp Nomad

Compared 17% of the time

Portainer vs HashiCorp Nomad

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs HashiCorp Nomad

Compared 11% of the time

Kubernetes vs HashiCorp Nomad

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon EKS vs HashiCorp Nomad

Compared 6% of the time

More HashiCorp Nomad Competitors

Amazon EKS vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 50% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 15% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon Elastic Container Service vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

November 2024

Download HashiCorp Nomad product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

December 2024

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform report

Download Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform product report

Learn More

HashiCorp

Red Hat

Overview

HashiCorp was founded by Mitchell Hashimoto and Armon Dadgar in 2012 with the goal of revolutionizing datacenter management: application development, delivery, and maintenance.

The datacenter of today is very different than the datacenter of yesterday, and we think the datacenter of tomorrow is just around the corner. We're writing software to take you all the way from yesterday to today, and then safely to tomorrow and beyond.

Physical, virtual, containers. Private cloud, public cloud, hybrid cloud. IaaS, PaaS, SaaS. Windows, Linux, Mac. These are just some of the choices faced when architecting a datacenter of today. And the choice is not one or the other; instead, it is often a combination of many of these.

HashiCorp builds tools to ease these decisions by presenting solutions that span the gaps. Our tools manage both physical machines and virtual machines, Windows, and Linux, SaaS and IaaS, etc. And we're committed to supporting next-generation technologies, as well.

HashiCorp was founded and continues to be run by the primary authors of all our core technologies powering thousands of companies worldwide. We speak at conferences and write books related to application and infrastructure management.

All our foundational technologies are open source and developed openly, and have been since 2010.

The Tao of HashiCorp is the foundation that guides our vision, roadmap, and product design. As you evaluate using or contributing to HashiCorp's products, it may be valuable to understand the motivations and intentions for our work.

Red Hat® OpenShift® offers a consistent hybrid cloud foundation for building and scaling containerized applications. Benefit from streamlined platform installation and upgrades from one of the enterprise Kubernetes leaders.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Edenor, BMW, Ford, Argentine Ministry of Health

Buyer's Guide

HashiCorp Nomad vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

December 2024

Free Report: HashiCorp Nomad vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about HashiCorp Nomad vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HashiCorp Nomad vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform report.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.