Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform comparison

HP and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. HP is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.0, while Kaspersky is ranked #55 with an average rating of 6.7. HP holds a 2.2% mindshare in EDR, compared to Kaspersky’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.
HP Wolf Security
Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews
  • 2,301 Views
  • 1,966 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Att...
Read 6 Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform reviews
  • 275 Views
  • 140 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

HP Wolf Security and Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform offer endpoint and targeted attack protection. Based on user reviews, HP Wolf Security is favored for its cost-effectiveness and customer support, while Kaspersky is praised for its comprehensive security features and advanced threat detection.

Features: HP Wolf Security provides robust endpoint protection, real-time threat isolation, and strong user feedback. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform offers advanced threat detection, sophisticated response mechanisms, and features tailored to complex threats.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest HP Wolf Security could improve integration with other security tools, enhance reporting features, and expand its capabilities. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform could benefit from a more intuitive setup process, better documentation, and simpler configuration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Kaspersky's deployment process is more intricate, which may cause delays, though its customer service is efficient despite not being universally praised like HP Wolf Security's support.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security is noted for lower initial costs and faster return on investment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform, despite its higher price, is valued for its advanced features that justify the expenditure over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
39th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
3.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (34th)
Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Att...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
55th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 2.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2344002 - PeerSpot reviewer
Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments
The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.
Read full review
Muhammad Ali Aziz - PeerSpot reviewer
A cost-effective solution for endpoint protection and EDR
The Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is designed to detect various attacks, such as Mitraframe, and provide alerts for each attack technique and procedure. It also offers alerts for potential threats and conducts thorough analyses through its sandbox environment, which isolates and executes malware or unknown files within virtual machines. This allows for real-time threat detection and feedback on potential threats. The platform is a SOC tool and thus requires skilled resources for effective operation, as it involves both automation and manual understanding of attack scales. Third-party intelligence integration enriches the alert system but may lead to occasional false positives, which can be fine-tuned through exclusion options and custom rule creation. The platform offers extensive customization options, allowing users to create rules specific to file detection or PowerShell activities. It provides visibility into telemetry data, enabling comprehensive monitoring of environmental activities. Integration with frameworks like Mitraframe helps tailor policies and rules to suit specific environments. The platform competes with products like FireEye, Snowflake, and Trend Micro. Integration between Kaspersky and other products is seamless, allowing unified threat detection. It is a solid choice for enterprises seeking advanced threat detection capabilities in the Middle East. Overall, I rate the solution eight out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."
"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."
"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."
"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."
"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."
"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."
"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."
"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."
"The solution is very easy to use. Its interface is very simple, and you can build IOC's indicators. You can use your rules to detect these attacks because you can leverage threat intelligence. Y"
"The product's deployment phase is easy."
"I feel the anti-ransomware update is one of the tool's valuable features."
"The most valuable use is detailing metadata collection from the endpoint and network."
"The email security feature is really good."
"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is stable and runs all the time."
 

Cons

"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"
"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."
"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."
"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."
"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."
"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."
"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."
"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms. There are a lot of updates that come out for Microsoft Windows operating systems and the Bromium product needs to be able to keep up quickly with those updates and all the browser updates that are coming out. It's hard to do, but that's really where they need to be more responsive because we end up with problems and then we have to call support to get patches, etc."
More HP Wolf Security cons
"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is not a good product. We had problems with endpoints and the solution did not detect it. We didn't get any alerts about the attack."
"In some of the places I have come across, even though they use Kaspersky, the ransomware enters their system."
"I think the tool is still not really good enough for integration compared to other products."
"The blind spot or gap in the platform is network analysis functionality."
"The backup and recovery features of the product are not good."
"The solution lacks cloud integrations."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."
"Pricing is reasonable."
"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."
"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."
"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."
"Kaspersky is one of the cheaper solutions."
"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is cheap."
"The solution has competitive pricing."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
40%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?
The product came as a bundle with the machine.
See all answers
What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?
The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?
I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.
See all answers
What do you like most about Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?
The solution is very easy to use. Its interface is very simple, and you can build IOC's indicators. You can use your rules to detect these attacks because you can leverage threat intelligence. Y
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?
Its price is reasonable; it's neither very high nor very low, considering its capabilities.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?
I think the tool is still not really good enough for integration compared to other products. If you need to integrate with the ecosystem of the Kaspersky primary, and if we are going to the third p...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security Logo
Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 16% of the time
Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 15% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 9% of the time
McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security Logo
McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 8% of the time
More HP Wolf Security Competitors
Darktrace vs Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform Logo
Darktrace vs Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform
Compared 61% of the time
Trend Vision One vs Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform Logo
Trend Vision One vs Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform
Compared 39% of the time
More Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
HP Wolf Security
February 2025
HP Wolf Security reportDownload HP Wolf Security product report
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform
February 2025
Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform reportDownload Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform product report
 

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry
Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack
 

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale. 

HP

Today’s cybercriminals constantly design unique and innovative methods of penetration and compromise. To avoid perimeter prevention technologies they use social engineering, non-malware and supply chain attacks to operate under the radar of security designed to catch ‘bad’ traces. It’s not enough to just ‘know’ what’s bad or dangerous – enterprises need to understand what’s normal, and use AI-driven techniques that simplify and automate this process. Targeted Attack Analyzer is a machine learning engine that involves self-learning to establish the baseline of normal, legitimate activities of an entire network. Through continuous network telemetry collection it finds deviations, detects suspicious activities and predicts further malicious actions at the initial stages of multilayered attacks.

Kaspersky
 

Sample Customers

Valspar
Republic of Serbia, Goods.ru, Tael, Insolar
Buyer's Guide
HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform
January 2025
Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.