We performed a comparison between Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform and Trend Vision One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The stability is very good."
"This is stable and scalable."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The most valuable use is detailing metadata collection from the endpoint and network."
"The email security feature is really good."
"The solution is very easy to use. Its interface is very simple, and you can build IOC's indicators. You can use your rules to detect these attacks because you can leverage threat intelligence. Y"
"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is stable and runs all the time."
"I feel the anti-ransomware update is one of the tool's valuable features."
"It helps us with investigations."
"The most valuable feature is the network protection shield on every server, which isolates attacks and prevents our clients from being affected."
"VisionOne offers a clear window into the security posture of our endpoints."
"The proactive approach is the best feature."
"Trend Micro XDR is a comprehensive solution that is not overly complex to use or manage."
"We haven't had any issues with configurations or customizations."
"The automatic EDR system that notifies us when something is wrong is valuable."
"Scaling is not a problem at all."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is not a good product. We had problems with endpoints and the solution did not detect it. We didn't get any alerts about the attack."
"In some of the places I have come across, even though they use Kaspersky, the ransomware enters their system."
"The blind spot or gap in the platform is network analysis functionality."
"The backup and recovery features of the product are not good."
"The solution lacks cloud integrations."
"Trend Micro doesn't have the next-generation firewall."
"The price could be lower."
"The centralized dashboard has room for improvement."
"The solution lacks compatibility with other products. It needs to integrate better with other surrounding solutions."
"There isn't a lot I'd do to change it. The web interface could be improved to sort of make it a little easier to manage multiple clients out of one location. It could also be made a bit easier to sort of manage the licensing side of it."
"It would be ideal if they could improve the control of connectivity between sensors."
"The automation capabilities on-premises could be improved, as we currently have to manually activate servers and push policies."
"The product needs to have a lot more maturity, and they need to improve the overall technical support framework for getting the value out of XDR."
More Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is ranked 53rd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 5 reviews while Trend Vision One is ranked 5th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 43 reviews. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is rated 6.6, while Trend Vision One is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform writes "The tool provides excellent sandboxing and email security features, but the backup and recovery features are not good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One writes "The integration of toolsets is key, enabling automation, and vendor has been tremendous partner for us". Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is most compared with Darktrace and HP Wolf Security, whereas Trend Vision One is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Micro Apex One, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Microsoft Defender XDR and Wazuh. See our Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform vs. Trend Vision One report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.