HP Wolf Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete comparison

HP and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. HP is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #38 with an average rating of 8.6. HP holds a 6.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

HP Wolf Security

Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews

8,798 Views
7,341 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Symantec Endpoint Security ...

Read 17 Symantec Endpoint Security Complete reviews

1,015 Views
752 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

HP Wolf Security

Symantec Endpoint Security ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

HP Wolf Security and Symantec Endpoint Security Complete both offer robust endpoint security solutions with distinct strengths. Users are happier with the pricing and support of HP Wolf Security, but Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is considered a superior product due to its features, which users feel are worth the price.

Features: HP Wolf Security is praised for its isolation capabilities, advanced threat protection, and ease of use. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete receives positive feedback for comprehensive threat detection, response automation, and advanced machine learning. Symantec's broader feature set leads users to perceive it as more advanced.

Room for Improvement: HP Wolf Security users point to occasional difficulty in managing complex environments and the need for better integration with other tools. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete users mention performance issues and a steep learning curve. Both products need improvements in different areas, but Symantec's complexity is a more significant drawback.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security is noted for its straightforward deployment and reliable customer support. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete, while praised for detailed setup guides, is seen as more challenging to deploy, with users having mixed experiences with customer service. Therefore, HP Wolf Security is preferred for ease of deployment and support.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security is considered more affordable, providing good ROI and lower setup costs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete, despite higher costs, delivers impressive ROI due to its advanced features. Users find Symantec worth the extra investment for its comprehensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (33rd)

Symantec Endpoint Security ...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

38th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 6.1%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Livin Sunil

Information Security Engineer at M.Tech

Provides comprehensive protection with a need for a more intuitive interface

Security Complete comes with antivirus plus EDR, which is a convergence of antivirus and EDR. I have both the antivirus and EDR features constantly, allowing my team's customers to conduct detailed analyses of where attacks have occurred or if any malicious files are present, which devices or files have been targeted. It provides a greater level of view, making it easy for my team to mitigate those particular attacks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"Security Complete comes with antivirus plus EDR, which is a convergence of antivirus and EDR."

"The feature I like the most is the Adaptive Protection... And it does not negatively affect users' activities because we can adapt it and allow binaries that are executed regularly, while forbidding those that are not executed within the company."

"In reference to zero-day attacks, we immediately get signatures from the Symantec site. That is good."

"One of the most valuable features includes elements such as host libraries."

"It protects emails and messages shared between users."

"The SONAR feature is valuable as it offers real-time protection and threat rejection."

"I am impressed with the tool's detection response."

"Endpoint security platform that provides protection for Active Directory environments, file servers, etc., and offers excellent technical support."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Complete pros

Cons

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms. There are a lot of updates that come out for Microsoft Windows operating systems and the Bromium product needs to be able to keep up quickly with those updates and all the browser updates that are coming out. It's hard to do, but that's really where they need to be more responsive because we end up with problems and then we have to call support to get patches, etc."

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"Symantec could have better support for iOS and Android mobile devices."

"The solution's support is not available over the weekends. We also need to have the DLP, endpoint security, and encryption integrated into one agent."

"Symantec Endpoint Security Complete could improve by integrating more easily with other Symantec security products."

"Symantec Endpoint Security Complete does not cover everything on the cloud. It does not cover the workstation emails. There are risks associated with it."

"The Threat Defense for Active Directory feature has a problem in that it is not possible to deploy it within a hybrid management architecture... we would have to migrate all the infrastructure to be managed by the cloud to deploy this feature, so we have not deployed it."

"Instead of the updates, the tool needs to come up with a concept similar to Veritas."

"They could improve the user interface."

"The solution should include automatic updates."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Complete cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"It's cost-effective and well-suited for smaller to midrange companies."

"The product's pricing is dependent on partnership levels. The solution's price is competitive compared to other solutions."

"The pricing is good. It's good value for the money."

"I'm recommending going with three-year licensing, rather than the yearly licensing option for this product."

"Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is not expensive."

"In terms of costs, Symantec Endpoint Security Complete has become costlier compared to how much it was in the past. The cost of the product is very high now. The customer needs to pay extra for additional features, but not for technical support. For example, if you need an email gateway or if you are looking for URL filtering, you have to pay extra, and that's where the costs for Symantec Endpoint Security Complete become higher."

"License renewal is not a straightforward process. I have a three-year subscription. It takes a long time to renew the license after three years. It is not proactive on that. The solution is expensive for the coverage that it does. I have to include other products to complement the protection that Symantec Endpoint Security Complete does not cover. We have to pay 18 euros. There are no additional support or maintenance costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?

The product came as a bundle with the machine.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?

The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?

I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Endpoint Security Complete?

The solution prevents any damage from viruses and provides risk mitigation for virus threats.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Endpoint Security Complete?

Symantec Endpoint Security Full/Complete license is not expensive and advise using the full feature.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Endpoint Security Complete?

They could improve the user interface. Currently, everything is pretty good, however, when it comes to the Maniac and Protection, there could be enhancements.

See all answers

Comparisons

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 16% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 8% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Compared 77% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Compared 10% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Compared 8% of the time

Malwarebytes vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Compared 4% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Security Complete Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

April 2025

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

March 2025

Symantec Endpoint Security Complete report

Download Symantec Endpoint Security Complete product report

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry

No data available

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale.

Symantec Endpoint Security (SES) Complete delivers comprehensive protection for all your traditional and mobile devices across the entire attack chain. Symantec endpoint innovations include behavioral isolation, Active Directory security, and Threat Hunter technologies to protect your endpoints against sophisticated threats and targeted attacks. For higher return-on-investment and lower total cost of ownership, this single-agent solution supports on-premises, hybrid, and cloud-based deployments.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Valspar

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

April 2025

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.