Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE Helion vs Oracle Java Cloud Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Helion
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
26th
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Java Cloud Service
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
18th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of HPE Helion is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Java Cloud Service is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
PaaS Clouds
 

Featured Reviews

it_user568173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 8, 2016
We're hoping to offer it as an open stack solution to our customers. Initial setup takes a lot longer than we expected.
We're looking for an open stack platform. The whole HPE wraparound support and everything that we can get with an open source project is what we are looking at. Helion Being backed by a vendor (HPE) rather than vanilla openstack gives us a little more confidence that the product is now at a level…
Arkabrata  Ghosh - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 20, 2023
User-friendly code development solution needing enhancements addressing glitches
There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors. We're in the process of continuously fixing to address these issues, and once resolved, the application will be ready. I've worked on this internal system application, and I'll give you an example of our specific challenge. There was an issue involving a complex query where data was stored and retrieved from the database. The application also had a reporting component that wasn't generating reports or collecting the required information for Excel reports. To address this, I made changes to the query. I focused on the data format issue encountered in the implementation class. However, when implementing these changes under a specific thread, the application server showed an exception. I also made adjustments to resolve the issue.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Oracle is a little more expensive right now, but not much compared to SAP. Oracle's prices are very much dependent on the scale of the project and how many users are there."
"Oracle Java Cloud Service is an expensive product."
"It is somewhat expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Java Cloud Service?
I did a comparative study on the pricing between Oracle and SAP S/4HANA, but it was related to databases and in the areas associated with the clouds. I can tell that Oracle is a little more expensi...
What needs improvement with Oracle Java Cloud Service?
The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution. When working with a cloud tool, it's never 100 percent secure and it is always someth...
 

Also Known As

HPE Helion Cloud, HP Helion
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ACA Fashion Software, myLoc, Mendix, Comline AG, Nava Solutions, 20th Century Fox, Zhejiang University, iService Global, Okinawa Cross Head, Creative Photo Cloud, Zuora, Ormuco, Ecad, MyCloud, Northern Ireland Civil Service (NICS)
Avaya, ADNOC Distribution, DocuSign, Zamil Industrial Investment Company
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Helion vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.