Top 10 Oracle Java Cloud Service Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

16 reviews
85% willing to recommend

737 followers

Top Oracle Java Cloud Service Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Oracle Java Cloud Service based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, and Red Hat OpenShift. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Azure

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Azure

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Azure excels in pricing, support, and versatility, making it suitable for diverse enterprise needs, including .NET applications. In comparison, Oracle Java Cloud Service is ideal for Java-centric businesses, focusing on specialized integration with Oracle products, offering strategic value despite higher initial costs.

Download Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure offers lower initial setup costs compared to Oracle Java Cloud Service, highlighting a significant cost-saving advantage for businesses looking to minimize upfront expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Azure offers lower initial setup costs compared to Oracle Java Cloud Service, highlighting a significant cost-saving advantage for businesses looking to minimize upfront expenses.

Amazon AWS

4.2 out of 5

Amazon AWS

4.2 out of 5

Amazon AWS offers extensive features with advanced security and versatility. In comparison, Oracle Java Cloud Service excels in deep integration for Java applications. AWS provides broader technology support, while Oracle's streamlined deployment benefits enterprises focused on Java, optimizing performance and ROI in such environments.

Download Amazon AWS vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service Report

Pricing

Amazon AWS generally offers flexible setup costs accommodating various budget ranges, while Oracle Java Cloud Service tends to have higher initial setup fees, reflecting its robust enterprise-focused offerings.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat OpenShift

4.2 out of 5

Red Hat OpenShift

4.2 out of 5

Oracle Java Cloud Service facilitates Java development with seamless integration and specialized support for Oracle applications. In comparison, Red Hat OpenShift focuses on comprehensive container orchestration and scalability, appealing to enterprises seeking flexibility with its Kubernetes-based architecture and adaptable deployment model.

Download Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift Report

Pricing

Oracle Java Cloud Service offers straightforward setup costs, whereas Red Hat OpenShift presents a more flexible pricing structure, highlighting their differing approaches to initial implementation expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE Helion

3.6 out of 5

HPE Helion

3.6 out of 5

HPE Helion is chosen for its flexibility and cost-effectiveness, appealing to enterprises seeking scalable computing with open-source integration. In comparison, Oracle Java Cloud Service attracts companies focused on Java development, emphasizing comprehensive features and high-performance environments despite higher costs.

Download HPE Helion vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service Report

Pricing

HPE Helion typically incurs lower setup costs compared to the Oracle Java Cloud Service, which can lead to substantial cost savings for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE Helion typically incurs lower setup costs compared to the Oracle Java Cloud Service, which can lead to substantial cost savings for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses.

Related categories

PaaS Clouds

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

Server Virtualization Software