We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Oracle Java Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."User interface and portal are great."
"I think the single sign-on functionality and the ease with which you can deposit things on the cloud have been valuable. Azure has very robust security functionalities and authentication features, which come with mobility, along with backup and credential checks."
"The solution is very simple to set up."
"The redundancy across different regions is the most valuable. It provides a big value for cloud services, especially for Microsoft."
"The ability to create the actual resource on the private cloud is easy to manage with Microsoft Azure."
"It is stable and scalable. It is useful for many applications and services, such as SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and OneDrive."
"We have found the most valuable feature to be the pricing calculator."
"Azure is very flexible and easy to manage."
"Backing up and recovery for my domain is very easy and fast. In addition, applying patches and undoing applied patches is effective and easy to do."
"The ability to manage security and access the server from any location with complete security using SSH is perfect for performing crucial tasks, even while travelling."
"The framework supports auto-configuration. A lot of features are already there. It is reliable and user-friendly to develop code, back-end engineering, or locate specific information such as addresses."
"The automated features of auto-purging in 12c helps clear disk space on a routine basis."
"Cloud has provided less maintenance."
"Self-provisioning, easy to choose from WebLogic 11g to 12c."
"The auto-backup, incremental backup and restoration features can be invaluable for management."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The tool should add an interface that is similar to AWS."
"Compared with other cloud solution providers, Microsoft is not good at local support."
"The integration pipeline could be a bit more broad in terms of applications."
"Overall, the solution is good but there are some minor technical issues that can be resolved."
"The market place can be raised, and the CMT can be more sophisticated to create more opportunities for the end users."
"The technical support is good, but the response time is poor."
"One area where Microsoft Azure could improve is in offering a broader range of pre-built plugins and tools compared to AWS."
"The security must be improved."
"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself. For example, how do we add more storage, how do we extend a specific portion? I would like to see videos illustrating some of the technical tasks that we often need to do."
"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."
"Needs better integration with other Oracle/non-Oracle products."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in PaaS Clouds with 299 reviews while Oracle Java Cloud Service is ranked 19th in PaaS Clouds with 15 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Oracle Java Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Java Cloud Service writes "User-friendly code development solution needing enhancements addressing glitches". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Oracle Java Cloud Service is most compared with Amazon AWS and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service. See our Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.