Hyland RPA vs UiPath comparison

Hyland and UiPath are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Hyland is ranked #33, while UiPath is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Hyland RPA

Read 1 Hyland RPA review

434 Views
253 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath

Read 775 UiPath reviews

45,350 Views
22,499 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Hyland RPA

UiPath

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hyland RPA and UiPath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA).

To learn more, read our detailed Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 813,418 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Hyland RPA

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

33rd

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

775

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

reviewer1638135

Works at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Aug 23, 2021

A scalable solution which is easy to install and use

We use the solution for banking, retail and invoice processing, these being replaced by the virtual box. The solution is very easy to use. While I, obviously, still require the support of the technical, delivery team, the POC is basically very quick. The solution should come with language…

Read full review

Michael-Peters

RPA Architect at Symrise

Oct 24, 2023

Improves accuracy and has the easiest interface and good scalability

Orchestrator needs an overhaul. They have added so many functions that it is sometimes quite hard to find the right settings. They have a tree hierarchy with the host and the tenant. Some settings you do on the host, and some settings you do on the tenant. You need to know at which level you are to find what you need. It all looks very same. The other thing that I have been telling them for years is the width of the activity. You cannot change the width. I do a lot of training to show something, and I constantly have to go into the advanced editor to show what is in there, but the big thing right now is Orchestrator.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is very quick."

"UiPath has reduced human error by 20%."

"The feature I like the most is ONEWEB UI automation. UiPath's OCR technology also works well. There is another feature called Action Center that lets you decide what happens after the data is captured."

"UiPath's interface element identification is arguably more reliable than Automation Anywhere's."

"I am a developer, and I love the tool's easiness with features like drag and drop. The tool is ready to use with some minor updates."

"I rate the scalability of UiPath, ten out of ten."

"My organization has been pretty happy with the amount of scalability that it has provided. One bot can literally run multiple processes and process millions of records."

"UiPath has a very good user interface, and the automation is a great feature. New users can easily understand UiPath."

"We are using the solution's selector technology for UI automation. That is the most important feature for us. For example, one of the applications in our company is being updated day by day, by the development team. We use selector to make it dynamic."

More UiPath pros

Cons

"The solution should come with language customization, which would simplify its use for our customers."

"UiPath's performance could be improved. UiPath's framework was built on top of .NET Core. It was a 32-bit platform initially, but they recently introduced a 64-bit version. Let's say I have a huge machine with 64 gigs of RAM. If I have a server machine and want to use multi-threading to extend my automation and multitask, the design won't allow me. I can't separate things into multiple processes."

"I would like to see improvements made in OCR, Captcha Automation, and PDF extraction."

"Many of the features that UiPath has are good, although better documentation is required for them."

"UiPath is very slow for scraping."

"We use intelligent automation for things like document processing. There is a validation center where the ML model extracts some values, and we can validate if it's correct. That aspect could be improved a little. The percentage of values extracted without validation could be increased. It's currently an attended process, but they should give you the option of making it unattended."

"Some features are limited for Orchestrator. For example, the AI features could be more flexible and easily accessible. Every time I want to use some new features, we have to do a deep dive into this technology."

"We aren't scaling up UiPath because it doesn't provide a satisfactory way to log and monitor data. Instead, we use other tools like Automation Anywhere for large-scale operations in our production environment. We're building solutions that can handle a huge amount of data so we can monitor real-time issues. I don't think UiPath solves that case for us."

"UiPath should expand its coding options and reduce its dependency on third-party resources. There should also be more flexible licenses for smaller businesses. It's hard for small companies to estimate the cost of adding users in their final budgets. UiPath could also improve error handling and capture a little more information about the execution of your processes."

More UiPath cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no licensing fee for our customers."

"I can estimate our licensing costs are approximately $100,000 USD per year."

"I believe that the price is on the higher side."

"It costs much less and it does much more than the competitors' solutions."

"There is some initial sticker shock from a lot of people regarding cost, until you show them what the actual benefit is. Initially, people are just going, "Why?" So, the retort for that is, "Look how much you will save, time, and budget-wise with one bot. If one bot costs X, this is how much it will save you over one year. This alleviates the "Oh my gosh" face, when it's 1200 dollars for a bot."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable and lower than its competitors."

"At the company that I was with previously, we were paying $3,600 USD per bot. With the new company that I am at, because we're new and we don't have the size, we are paying $8,000 USD per bot."

"UiPath is quite expensive and whatever additional components you want to use will have additional costs."

"UiPath is too expensive."

More UiPath pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

24%

Media Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

11%

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries

I can only speak to UiPath since that is the only RPA solution that I have used. I know that there are specific packages that you can integrate into your project that is specifically made to work w...

See all answers

RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?

Yes, Attended Bots which can run without centralized control Module. RPA Tools like Automation Anywhere, uiPath ,Power Automation they do support this.

See all answers

How do I choose between UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate?

Microsoft‌ ‌Power‌ ‌Automate‌ ‌is‌ ‌intuitive‌ ‌and‌ ‌easy‌ ‌to‌ ‌integrate‌ ‌and‌ ‌use.‌ ‌I‌ ‌like‌ ‌that‌ ‌there‌ ‌is‌ ‌no‌ ‌coding‌ ‌experience‌ ‌necessary,‌ ‌and‌ ‌appreciate‌ ‌the‌ ‌automated‌...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Microsoft Power Automate vs UiPath

Compared 28% of the time

Blue Prism vs UiPath

Compared 16% of the time

Automation Anywhere (AA) vs UiPath

Compared 11% of the time

Robocorp vs UiPath

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Robotic Process Automation vs UiPath

Compared 6% of the time

More UiPath Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

October 2024

Download Hyland RPA product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath

September 2024

Download UiPath product report

Also Known As

Another Monday

No data available

Learn More

Hyland

UiPath

Overview

Hyland RPA automatically captures, compiles and sequences process steps, recognizes unique elements for process tracking and documents all user interactions. Working alongside humans, Hyland RPA increases efficiency by reallocating idle bots with unique task “pulling” and processes any task type with a farm of multifunctional bots. Using low-code drag-and-drop tools, Hyland RPA integrates with core systems, including automation process parameters and output process scripts for bot execution. Hyland RPA provides a central view for management and customization, enables real-time monitoring, controlling and reporting and offers intuitive modification controls.

UiPath is a user-friendly automation software that streamlines business processes by automating repetitive tasks. It offers extensive automation capabilities, seamless integration with other systems, and robust security measures.

Users appreciate its intuitive design, ease of use, and ability to automate complex workflows.

Its seamless integration with various applications ensures smooth data exchange and enhances workflow management, while strong security measures protect sensitive data and maintain compliance with industry standards.

Sample Customers

ING, Vodafone, T-Mobile, Billbox

1. Accenture 2. Deloitte 3. PwC 4. IBM 5. Capgemini 6. KPMG 7. Ernst & Young 8. Infosys 9. Cognizant 10. Wipro 11. Tata Consultancy Services 12. HCL Technologies 13. Genpact 14. Tech Mahindra 15. DXC Technology 16. Atos 17. NTT Data 18. CGI 19. L&T Infotech 20. Hexaware Technologies 21. Mindtree 22. Mphasis 23. Virtusa 24. Syntel 25. Zensar Technologies 26. WNS Global Services 27. Hexaware Technologies 28. Larsen & Toubro Infotech 29. Persistent Systems 30. QuEST Global 31. Sonata Software 32. Zensar Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

October 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.