Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HyperScience vs Nanonets comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
HyperScience scales efficiently, supporting diverse sectors with adaptable automation, despite some configuration challenges and variable user numbers.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.6
HyperScience offers advanced OCR for handwritten documents, with high accuracy, AI enhancements, and robust user training and reporting.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.0
HyperScience aims to improve usability, expand language support, automate forms, and enhance integration with RPA tools and APIs.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
9.0
HyperScience's customer service is praised for responsiveness, effective customization, and in-house support, with users expressing overall satisfaction.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
HyperScience delivers stable and reliable performance, though enhancements in language support and dictionary validations are needed.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.4
Enterprise buyers had mixed pricing experiences, with some finding HyperScience affordable and others expensive, needing direct inquiry for details.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

HyperScience
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
5th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nanonets
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
16th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the mindshare of HyperScience is 9.4%, up from 9.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nanonets is 2.0%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
 

Featured Reviews

Pavan Balaji - PeerSpot reviewer
Performs well on handwritten text and on checkboxes; lacks sufficient language options
The solution lacks support for a variety of languages. It supports three or four languages, whereas other vendors support 60 languages. I'd also like to see some improvement in the various dictionaries, including address validation dictionaries, or phone number validation dictionaries, those things need to be improved. It provides a machine confidence score but doesn't give accuracy scores.
Use Nanonets?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hyperscience's customers are some of the top enterprises in the Insurance, Government, Financial Services, and Healthcare industries.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ABBYY, UiPath, Automation Anywhere and others in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP). Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.