Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
HyperScience Logo

HyperScience Reviews

Vendor: HyperScience
3.8 out of 5
308 followers
Start review

What is HyperScience?

Featured HyperScience reviews

HyperScience mindshare

As of April 2025, the mindshare of HyperScience in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category stands at 7.5%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)

PeerResearch reports based on HyperScience reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryIntelligent Document Processing (IDP)Apr 28, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersApr 28, 2025Download
ComparisonHyperScience vs ABBYY VantageApr 28, 2025Download
ComparisonHyperScience vs UiPath Document UnderstandingApr 28, 2025Download
ComparisonHyperScience vs Automation AnywhereApr 28, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Automation Anywhere4.22.9%95%556 interviewsAdd to research
ABBYY Vantage4.017.0%92%50 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
Government
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
4%
University
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Construction Company
3%
Retailer
3%
Media Company
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%

Compare HyperScience with alternative products

Learn more about HyperScience

HyperScience customers

Related questions

 

HyperScience reviews

Sort by:
Abdul Quadir - PeerSpot user
Assistant Manager at WNS Global Services
Verified user of HyperScience
Sep 22, 2022
Product version discussed: 8.0
It has a lot of functionality, whatever we use, but a few things could be improved

Pros

"Valuable features include tools like IQ Bot and the ability to extract handwritten documents with 93-95 per cent accuracy."

Cons

"Extracting tables from certain documents could be improved."
Satender Sajwan - PeerSpot user
Operations Manager at Genpact
Verified user of HyperScience
Nov 3, 2022
Gave a better output every time, reduced our touch time by 80%, and had a robust reporting mechanism to improve the process

Pros

"It provides the best accuracy for handwritten forms, which is a struggle in the industry. You can take processes with a lot of manual work and streamline them through this tool. "

Cons

"HyperScience has less capability while working on unstructured forms. Unstructured forms are those where there is no standard structure and the information can be anywhere on the form. They need to develop this capability."
Find out what your peers are saying about HyperScience. Updated April 2025
849,475 professionals have used our research since 2012.
YS
OCR Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of HyperScience
Aug 18, 2021
Product version discussed: Open Source Version
An intelligent document processing and automation solution that works well with hand written documents, but it would be better if it supported more formats

Pros

"I like that compared to other tools, HyperScience works best with handwritten documents."

Cons

"The product's usability could be better. The first pain point is that we're getting the output in a different format, and we were expecting a different timetable. The second point is that if you want better results, HyperScience says you have to configure a minimal PDF or a maximum of 400 PDFs. If you want results with 400 PDFs for what's written by these doctors, then you also configure the maximum of 400 templates for that. So, it's essentially a lack of support from HyperScience. In the next release, it would be better if failure scenarios were reduced. It would also help if they offered different formats, inputs or injections, and added different scenarios."
Pavan Balaji - PeerSpot user
Digital Innovation Leader at Allstate India
Verified user of HyperScience
Aug 4, 2022
Performs well on handwritten text and on checkboxes; lacks sufficient language options

Pros

"Has algorithms that can detect a document template even if the image has a lot of distortions."

Cons

"The solution lacks support for a greater range of languages."
Pavan Nanjundappa - PeerSpot user
Principal Data Scientist at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of HyperScience
Apr 15, 2022
Effective ORC, highly scalable, but limited dictionary corrections

Pros

"What I liked more about HyperScience was the quality of the OCR it is a lot better compared to Google."

Cons

"HyperScience could improve the unstructured data extraction feature. "
PeerSpot user
Lead Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Verified user of HyperScience
Mar 26, 2022
Beneficial user-training module, reliable, and useful digital extractions

Pros

"One of the most valuable features of HyperScience is the user-training module. Whenever the extraction takes place, based on the way we have trained HyperScience, it would give us some success status or a certain confidence level. If the solution has processed something that it determined was not extracted correctly it will queue those items for manual review."

Cons

"No solution is perfect and there are several different scenarios that could be improved in HyperScience. One area is where there are multiple tables in the same form I have seen HyperScience struggle. There is some issue with supporting the extraction from multiple tables involved on the same form. If this could improve, it would be a big benefit."
PeerSpot user
Head of AI and Automation at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Verified user of HyperScience
Jul 20, 2022
Good accuracy, a market leader, and offers various use cases

Pros

"We have seen pretty good accuracy."

Cons

"They could work on the price and make it a bit more reasonable."