IBM Analytics Engine vs Spark SQL comparison

IBM and Apache are both solutions in the Hadoop category. IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Apache is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. IBM holds a 1.8% mindshare in H, compared to Apache’s 9.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Apache users who would recommend it.

IBM Analytics Engine

Read 1 IBM Analytics Engine review

132 Views
65 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Spark SQL

Read 14 Spark SQL reviews

1,046 Views
777 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

IBM Analytics Engine

Spark SQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Analytics Engine and Spark SQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop.

To learn more, read our detailed Hadoop Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Hadoop

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM Analytics Engine

Ranking in Hadoop

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spark SQL

Ranking in Hadoop

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Hadoop category, the mindshare of IBM Analytics Engine is 1.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spark SQL is 9.9%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Hadoop

Featured Reviews

Saket Pandey

Product Manager at a hospitality company with 51-200 employees

Good solution for small and medium-sized businesses and highly stable

I would advise instead of only going through other reviews; it would be great if you could schedule a talk with the IBM team that would be helping you implement this solution. They would deep dive into the process and protocols you are currently set up in, and then they will provide you an optimal solution and optimal price. So I believe talking with the support team was really amazing. They even helped us in some other parts as well. It is a good solution for small and medium-sized businesses. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten because of the support team. They were able to resolve issues, which helped us deploy higher-grade solutions correctly and quickly. We were able to ensure that our processes were working correctly, and we saved about 15-16% of a week's time by using this solution. In terms of return on investment, we saved about $7,000 a month.

Read full review

Lucas Dreyer

Data Engineer at BBD

Processing solution used for data engineering and transformation with the ability to process large datasets

It takes a bit of time to get used to using this solution versus Panda as it has a steep learning curve. You need quite a high level of skill with SQL in general to use this solution. If SQL is not someone's primary language, they might find it difficult to get used to. This solution could be improved if there was a bridge between Panda and Spark SQL such as translating from Panda operations to SQL and then working with those queries that are generated. In a future release, it would be useful to have a real time dashboard versus batch updates to Power BI.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best part was that we could make minor changes in the way we were bifurcating the data, even at a very small scale. The accuracy of conversion was also very high."

"One of Spark SQL's most beautiful features is running parallel queries to go through enormous data."

"The performance is one of the most important features. It has an API to process the data in a functional manner."

"It is a stable solution."

"Offers a variety of methods to design queries and incorporates the regular SQL syntax within tasks."

"Certain data sets that are very large are very difficult to process with Pandas and Python libraries. Spark SQL has helped us a lot with that."

"The team members don't have to learn a new language and can implement complex tasks very easily using only SQL."

"The speed of getting data."

"This solution is useful to leverage within a distributed ecosystem."

More Spark SQL pros

Cons

"One area for improvement would be the initial setup stage, which took longer than expected."

"There should be better integration with other solutions."

"In terms of improvement, the only thing that could be enhanced is the stability aspect of Spark SQL."

"It would be beneficial for aggregate functions to include a code block or toolbox that explains its calculations or supported conditional statements."

"There are many inconsistencies in syntax for the different querying tasks."

"This solution could be improved by adding monitoring and integration for the EMR."

"I've experienced some incompatibilities when using the Delta Lake format."

"Being a new user, I am not able to find out how to partition it correctly. I probably need more information or knowledge. In other database solutions, you can easily optimize all partitions. I haven't found a quicker way to do that in Spark SQL. It would be good if you don't need a partition here, and the system automatically partitions in the best way. They can also provide more educational resources for new users."

"Anything to improve the GUI would be helpful."

More Spark SQL cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There is no license or subscription for this solution."

"We don't have to pay for licenses with this solution because we are working in a small market, and we rely on open-source because the budgets of projects are very small."

"The solution is open-sourced and free."

"We use the open-source version, so we do not have direct support from Apache."

"The solution is bundled with Palantir Foundry at no extra charge."

"The on-premise solution is quite expensive in terms of hardware, setting up the cluster, memory, hardware and resources. It depends on the use case, but in our case with a shared cluster which is quite large, it is quite expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Analytics Engine?

The best part was that we could make minor changes in the way we were bifurcating the data, even at a very small scale. The accuracy of conversion was also very high.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Analytics Engine?

For large enterprises, it's a costly solution. I'd rate its pricing around seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Analytics Engine?

One area for improvement would be the initial setup stage, which took longer than expected. However, the support team was helpful. If the technical requirements for setup were reduced, the solution...

See all answers

What do you like most about Spark SQL?

Spark SQL's efficiency in managing distributed data and its simplicity in expressing complex operations make it an essential part of our data pipeline.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spark SQL?

We don't have to pay for licenses with this solution because we are working in a small market, and we rely on open-source because the budgets of projects are very small.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spark SQL?

In terms of improvement, the only thing that could be enhanced is the stability aspect of Spark SQL. There could be additional features that I haven't explored but the current solution for working ...

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric vs IBM Analytics Engine

Compared 100% of the time

More IBM Analytics Engine Competitors

Apache Spark vs Spark SQL

Compared 59% of the time

SAP HANA vs Spark SQL

Compared 11% of the time

HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric vs Spark SQL

Compared 11% of the time

Netezza Analytics vs Spark SQL

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Db2 Big SQL vs Spark SQL

Compared 9% of the time

More Spark SQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hadoop

December 2024

Download IBM Analytics Engine product report

Buyer's Guide

Spark SQL

November 2024

Download Spark SQL product report

Learn More

IBM

Apache

Overview

IBM Analytics Engine provides an architecture for Hadoop clusters that decouples the compute and storage tiers. Instead of a permanent cluster formed of dual-purpose nodes, the Analytics Engine allows users to store data in an object storage layer such as IBM Cloud Object Storage and spins up clusters of compute notes when needed. Separating compute from storage helps to transform the flexibility, scalability and maintainability of big data analytics platforms.

Spark SQL is a Spark module for structured data processing. Unlike the basic Spark RDD API, the interfaces provided by Spark SQL provide Spark with more information about the structure of both the data and the computation being performed. There are several ways to interact with Spark SQL including SQL and the Dataset API. When computing a result the same execution engine is used, independent of which API/language you are using to express the computation. This unification means that developers can easily switch back and forth between different APIs based on which provides the most natural way to express a given transformation.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, Alibaba Taobao, Kenshoo, Hitachi Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Hadoop vendors.

We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.