Amazon EMR vs Spark SQL comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Apache are both solutions in the Hadoop category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Apache is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 14.2% mindshare in H, compared to Apache’s 10.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Apache users who would recommend it.

Amazon EMR

Read 22 Amazon EMR reviews

1,295 Views
1,112 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Spark SQL

Read 14 Spark SQL reviews

965 Views
733 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Amazon EMR

Spark SQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EMR and Spark SQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Hadoop solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon EMR vs. Spark SQL Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EMR vs. Spark SQL

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EMR

Ranking in Hadoop

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Warehouse (11th)

Spark SQL

Ranking in Hadoop

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Hadoop category, the mindshare of Amazon EMR is 14.2%, down from 18.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spark SQL is 10.4%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Hadoop

Featured Reviews

Prashant Singh

Vice President -Product Management at Paytm

Seamless data integration enhances reporting efficiency and an easy setup

Amazon EMR has multiple connectors that can connect to various data sources. The service charges are based on processing only, depending on the resources used, which can help save money. It is easy to integrate with other services for storage, allowing data to be shifted to cheaper storage based on usage.

Read full review

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy to use and do not require a learning curve

Spark SQL can improve the documentation they have provided. It can be a bit unclear at times. They could improve the documentation a bit more so that we can understand it more easily. Moreover, they could improve SparkUI to have more advanced versions of the performance and the queries and all.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a variety of options and support systems."

"Amazon EMR has multiple connectors that can connect to various data sources."

"The solution is scalable."

"The security of the managed workflow and the managed services are the best features for us. Since we inherited their security model and it's all managed services, those are the key benefits for our clients."

"The ability to resize the cluster is what really makes it stand out over other Hadoop and big data solutions."

"The solution is pretty simple to set up."

"When we grade big jobs from on-prem to the cloud, we do it in EMR with Spark."

"In Amazon EMR it is easy to rebuild anything, easy to upgrade and has good fault tolerance."

More Amazon EMR pros

"It is a stable solution."

"Spark SQL's efficiency in managing distributed data and its simplicity in expressing complex operations make it an essential part of our data pipeline."

"The stability was fine. It behaved as expected."

"The performance is one of the most important features. It has an API to process the data in a functional manner."

"The solution is easy to understand if you have basic knowledge of SQL commands."

"Data validation and ease of use are the most valuable features."

"Offers a variety of methods to design queries and incorporates the regular SQL syntax within tasks."

"The team members don't have to learn a new language and can implement complex tasks very easily using only SQL."

More Spark SQL pros

Cons

"The most complicated thing is configuring to the cluster and ensure it's running correctly."

"The legacy versions of the solution are not supported in the new versions."

"The initial setup was time-consuming."

"The dashboard management could be better. Right now, it's lacking a bit."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"Amazon EMR can improve by adding some features, such as megastore services and HiveServer2. Additionally, the user interface could be better, similar to what Apache service provides, cross-platform services."

"We don't have much control. If we have multiple users, if they want to scale up, the cost will go and increase and we don't know how we can restrict that price part."

"Spark jobs take longer on Amazon EMR compared to previous experiences."

More Amazon EMR cons

"There should be better integration with other solutions."

"In terms of improvement, the only thing that could be enhanced is the stability aspect of Spark SQL."

"It would be beneficial for aggregate functions to include a code block or toolbox that explains its calculations or supported conditional statements."

"I've experienced some incompatibilities when using the Delta Lake format."

"Anything to improve the GUI would be helpful."

"In the next update, we'd like to see better performance for small points of data. It is possible but there are better tools that are faster and cheaper."

"It would be useful if Spark SQL integrated with some data visualization tools."

"SparkUI could have more advanced versions of the performance and the queries and all."

More Spark SQL cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"The cost of Amazon EMR is very high."

"The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"You don't need to pay for licensing on a yearly or monthly basis, you only pay for what you use, in terms of underlying instances."

"There is a small fee for the EMR system, but major cost components are the underlying infrastructure resources which we actually use."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. It can be expensive since it's a managed service, and if you are not careful, you can run into unexpected charges. You can make a mistake that costs you tens of thousands of dollars. That's happened to us twice, so I'm sensitive to it. We're still trying to work on that. Our smallest client probably spends a hundred thousand dollars yearly on licensing, while our largest is well over a million."

"Amazon EMR's price is reasonable."

More Amazon EMR pricing and cost advice

"The solution is open-sourced and free."

"The solution is bundled with Palantir Foundry at no extra charge."

"We use the open-source version, so we do not have direct support from Apache."

"The on-premise solution is quite expensive in terms of hardware, setting up the cluster, memory, hardware and resources. It depends on the use case, but in our case with a shared cluster which is quite large, it is quite expensive."

"We don't have to pay for licenses with this solution because we are working in a small market, and we rely on open-source because the budgets of projects are very small."

"There is no license or subscription for this solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

15%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon EMR?

Amazon EMR is a good solution that can be used to manage big data.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EMR?

The cost of Amazon EMR is a little bit expensive, especially considering the support package, which includes a gold package.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon EMR?

Spark jobs take longer on Amazon EMR compared to previous experiences. This aspect could be improved to make them more efficient.

See all answers

What do you like most about Spark SQL?

Spark SQL's efficiency in managing distributed data and its simplicity in expressing complex operations make it an essential part of our data pipeline.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spark SQL?

We don't have to pay for licenses with this solution because we are working in a small market, and we rely on open-source because the budgets of projects are very small.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spark SQL?

In terms of improvement, the only thing that could be enhanced is the stability aspect of Spark SQL. There could be additional features that I haven't explored but the current solution for working ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Snowflake vs Amazon EMR

Compared 38% of the time

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs Amazon EMR

Compared 30% of the time

Amazon Redshift vs Amazon EMR

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Amazon EMR

Compared 6% of the time

Apache Spark vs Amazon EMR

Compared 5% of the time

More Amazon EMR Competitors

Apache Spark vs Spark SQL

Compared 58% of the time

HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric vs Spark SQL

Compared 12% of the time

Netezza Analytics vs Spark SQL

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Db2 Big SQL vs Spark SQL

Compared 10% of the time

SAP HANA vs Spark SQL

Compared 10% of the time

More Spark SQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EMR

January 2025

Download Amazon EMR product report

Buyer's Guide

Spark SQL

December 2024

Download Spark SQL product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic MapReduce

No data available

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Apache

Overview

Amazon Elastic MapReduce (Amazon EMR) is a web service that makes it easy to quickly and cost-effectively process vast amounts of data. Amazon EMR simplifies big data processing, providing a managed Hadoop framework that makes it easy, fast, and cost-effective for you to distribute and process vast amounts of your data across dynamically scalable Amazon EC2 instances.

Spark SQL is a Spark module for structured data processing. Unlike the basic Spark RDD API, the interfaces provided by Spark SQL provide Spark with more information about the structure of both the data and the computation being performed. There are several ways to interact with Spark SQL including SQL and the Dataset API. When computing a result the same execution engine is used, independent of which API/language you are using to express the computation. This unification means that developers can easily switch back and forth between different APIs based on which provides the most natural way to express a given transformation.

Sample Customers

Yelp

UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, Alibaba Taobao, Kenshoo, Hitachi Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EMR vs. Spark SQL

January 2025

Free Report: Amazon EMR vs. Spark SQL

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EMR vs. Spark SQL and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon EMR vs. Spark SQL report.

See our list of best Hadoop vendors.

We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.