IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs Perforce Acana comparison

IBM and Perforce are both solutions in the API Management category. IBM is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.5, while Perforce is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 0.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to Perforce’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews

755 Views
553 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Perforce Acana

Read 3 Perforce Acana reviews

815 Views
698 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Perforce Acana

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

Perforce Acana and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration compete in delivering integration solutions, with IBM Cloud Pak holding the advantage due to its advanced features and flexibility, despite Perforce Acana's cost-effective appeal.

Features: Perforce Acana supports a budget-friendly and intuitive interface, streamlined version control, and continuous integration, suitable for smaller operations. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration offers AI-driven automation, extensive API management, and comprehensive integration capabilities, ideal for complex enterprise environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Perforce Acana provides an easy deployment process and responsive customer service, catering to teams with limited IT resources. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration has a more complex deployment needing an advanced understanding but is supported by comprehensive customer service to assist users through the process, enhancing scalability and customization.

Pricing and ROI: Perforce Acana's competitive pricing and quick ROI make it a good choice for budget-conscious organizations due to low setup costs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration requires a larger initial investment, promising high ROI with advanced features that improve long-term efficiencies, which is suitable for those looking for expansive capabilities beyond initial cost-saving.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Perforce Acana Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Perforce Acana

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Ranking in API Management

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (15th)

Perforce Acana

Ranking in API Management

28th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 0.4%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perforce Acana is 0.5%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Neelima Golla

Senior Software Engineer at NessPRO Italy

A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation

I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

Saurav Krishna

Data Engineering and AI Intern at .3Lines Venture Capital

Authentication mechanism is easy to implement but improvement is needed in documentation

For API security purposes, we use the tool to host all our APIs. This allows us to take advantage of the security features provided by the platform. With the solution, we can implement rules such as rate limiting and restricting the number of API calls for each user. It acts as a secure gateway…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"It is a stable solution."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

"The tool's authentication mechanism is easy to implement. We had to define a few parameters."

"Good interface, intuitive solution."

"It allowed us to publish and replace pre-essential transactions in one place, with a uniformity in terms of control and policies."

Cons

"The initial setup is not easy."

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"The pricing can be improved."

"The product has new features that we are going to implement in the next few months, such as API management and analytic reporting."

"Akana API Management needs to improve its documentation."

"Lacks an integrated billing feature."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive solution."

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"For us, the pricing and licensing policies were for an on-premise installation with a fixed cost structure, that matched our budgeting policies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Akana API Management?

The tool's authentication mechanism is easy to implement. We had to define a few parameters.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Akana API Management?

Akana API Management needs to improve its documentation.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akana API Management?

I rate Akana API Management an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 45% of the time

IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 15% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

AWS Glue vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors

Apigee vs Perforce Acana

Compared 42% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Perforce Acana

Compared 18% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs Perforce Acana

Compared 15% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Perforce Acana

Compared 15% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Perforce Acana

Compared 11% of the time

More Perforce Acana Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

April 2025

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

April 2025

Download Perforce Acana product report

Overview

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

Perforce Acana optimizes workflows with robust functionality designed for efficient file versioning and collaboration. It offers reliable features suitable for organizations requiring performance and scalability.

Leveraging powerful version control, Perforce Acana enables teams to manage large codebases and complex projects with ease. Its distributed architecture supports concurrent editing, ensuring developers collaborate effectively without workflow interruptions. Integration with popular development tools streamlines operations, making it a preferred choice for high-demand environments needing adaptability alongside stringent compliance standards.

What are Perforce Acana's key features?

Version Control: Offers advanced capabilities for managing large-scale projects with ease.
Scalability: Supports expansive teams and growing codebases efficiently.
Integration: Syncs seamlessly with numerous development tools and platforms.
Concurrent Editing: Facilitates simultaneous collaboration among developers.

Which benefits should users consider from reviews?

Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined operations that improve team efficiency.
Reduced Downtime: Reliable architecture minimizing workflow disruptions.
Cost-Effectiveness: Long-term savings through improved resource management.
Scalability: Growing projects accommodated without sacrificing performance.

Perforce Acana is widely adopted in industries such as gaming and finance, where robust version control and collaborative capabilities are essential. It ensures large teams operate seamlessly, supporting intense development cycles while adhering to industry-specific regulations.

Perforce

Sample Customers

CVS Health Corporation

British American Tobacco, Credit Suisse, Daimler, eBay, FOX, Liberty Mutual, Marriott, Mayo Clinic, Skandia, Tata communications

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Perforce Acana

March 2025

Free Report: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Perforce Acana

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Perforce Acana and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Perforce Acana report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.