IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration comparison

IBM App Connect and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. IBM App Connect is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2, while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5. IBM App Connect holds a 4.2% mindshare in CDI, compared to IBM Cloud Pak for Integration’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM App Connect users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration users who would recommend it.

IBM App Connect

Read 23 IBM App Connect reviews

1,843 Views
1,010 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews

668 Views
502 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM App Connect

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

IBM App Connect and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration serve distinct integration needs, competing in the integration tools category. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration appears to have the upper hand due to its robust features and comprehensive support, making it suitable for enterprises with complex requirements, despite its higher cost.

Features: IBM App Connect offers pre-built connectors, quick integration with cloud services, and straightforward API management. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration includes AI-driven automation, multi-style integration, and strong security capabilities, making it appealing for enterprises requiring extensive integration.

Room for Improvement: IBM App Connect can enhance its scalability and complexity management for larger setups. It could also improve its connectors' capabilities for more diverse applications. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration might benefit from a simpler user interface and reduced deployment complexity, along with more competitive pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM App Connect provides a simpler deployment process and commendable customer service, enabling rapid integration. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration involves a more complex deployment but offers extensive support and documentation for comprehensive integration setups.

Pricing and ROI: IBM App Connect is cost-effective with a low setup cost, delivering quick ROI for simpler integration needs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration, while having a higher initial cost, offers advanced capabilities and scalability, showing higher ROI for businesses willing to invest in extensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM App Connect vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM App Connect

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

15th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Management (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM App Connect is 4.2%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 1.9%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Mehdi El Filahi

Co-Founder at tenekit

Offers flexible adapters, good scalability but logging can be difficult at times

There is room for improvement in the logging messages. Sometimes, if you put someone new into App Connect, they can abandon it the same day. The logging is really painful. However, IBM has made efforts to integrate with Elasticsearch for logging, so that's an improvement. Overall, the logging can be difficult at times. One more important point is that if IBM improves its CI/CD capabilities, it will make a big difference. Right now, I have to create my own CI/CD setup from scratch for every client, which is inefficient. Back in 2013, I worked with Sonic ESB, and even then, it had CI/CD with Maven. With App Connect, you need to build everything yourself when using tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, or CircleCI. IBM really needs to provide official support for this.

Read full review

Igor Khalitov

Owner/Full Stack Software Engineer at Maraphonic, Inc.

Manages APIs and integrates microservices with redirection feature

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration includes monitoring capabilities to track the performance and health of your integrations. You can quickly roll back to a previous version if an issue arises. Additionally, it supports incremental deployments, allowing you to shift traffic to a new version of an API gradually. For example, you can start by directing 10% of traffic to the new version while the rest continue using the legacy version. If everything works as expected, you can gradually increase the traffic to the new version over time. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration has a client base that includes numerous organizations using AI and machine learning technologies. We leverage an open-source machine learning framework and integrate it with Kafka to help create and manage various products and data retrieval processes. For companies with private data, the framework first retrieves relevant data from a GitHub database, which is then combined with the final request before being sent to a language model like GPT. This ensures that the language model uses your specific data to generate responses. Kafka plays a key role by streaming real-time data from file systems and databases like Oracle and Microsoft SQL. This data is published to Kafka topics, then vectorized and used with artificial intelligence to enhance the overall process. It's like an old-fashioned approach. The best way is to redesign it with products such as Kafka. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Technical support is good."

"App Connect's best feature is that it can be deployed in a container."

"It has different type of interfaces that can integrate with companies."

"The solution is fast and supports Open UI 3.0 certification."

"The most valuable feature is the security."

"We use IBM App Connect for the integration between the applications."

"Provides good security features."

"There is a friendly interface for configuration, and integration is made easy."

More IBM App Connect pros

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"It is a stable solution."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

Cons

"Finding developers for the product is difficult since it is a niche solution. I know the OpenShift environment is running well for the microservice environment. We had some issues with the other environment we tried to implement. It can be easily implemented internally, but we have some problems in practice."

"The user interface of IBM App Connect can be a little bit more user-friendly, I would say because the first-time developer is onboarded while using IBM App Connect, he or she may get a little intimidated or daunted looking at all the options available or the pipelines, et cetera."

"When we do a version upgrade of the system, the platform is kind of complicated."

"IBM App Connect should improve security features."

"They reply in one or two hours at most, but they could be better."

"Plugins for the repositories are difficult to find."

"The product should improve its support."

"The interface could be better."

More IBM App Connect cons

"The pricing can be improved."

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM App Connect's pricing is high compared to other products."

"It is very expensive if we want to scale."

"App Connect is not cheap."

"The solution's pricing isn't cheap, but you can get good discounts based on your competitive deal."

"The price could be better."

"Initially, App Connect was quite expensive because the cost was based on the number of processors we used. However, it's now based on containers, which means we can be more specific about our consumption and get a better price."

"The licensing cost for IBM App Connect is very high."

"The cost depends upon the consumer."

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"It is an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

58%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM App Connect?

I like the adapters. The adapters help us achieve scalability. If you want to connect to SAP, there's an adapter. Salesforce? There's an adapter. You want to connect to another system? There's like...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM App Connect?

IBM App Connect's pricing is high compared to other products.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM App Connect?

Our company has a big project for delivery and e-commerce sites. We use IBM App Connect to deliver information to our end users after they buy our products. We get information from many places, suc...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...

See all answers

Comparisons

webMethods.io vs IBM App Connect

Compared 32% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs IBM App Connect

Compared 12% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs IBM App Connect

Compared 10% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM App Connect

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Process Orchestration vs IBM App Connect

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM App Connect Competitors

IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 17% of the time

AWS Glue vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 11% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 6% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect

February 2025

Download IBM App Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

January 2025

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report

Also Known As

IBM Cast Iron

No data available

Overview

Rapidly connect public clouds, private clouds and on-premises application

App Connect Professional is IBM’s cloud integration offering which delivers an integration solution
• With ease-of-use, flexibility and increased responsiveness to the evolving business needs, while removing the daunting complexities of integration.
• Provides the powerful combination of a ‘simple integration experience’ for business users looking to automate how their applications talk to each other; coupled with a ‘configuration based integration’ approach for IT.
• App Connect Professional is for the teams and integration developers who need to solve more complex problems and need powerful tooling for integration scenarios

IBM

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

Sample Customers

United Way of Allegheny County, Saint-Gobain CPS, Ricoh, SunTrust Banks Inc.

CVS Health Corporation

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

January 2025

Free Report: IBM App Connect vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM App Connect vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM App Connect vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.