IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs Talend Data Management Platform comparison

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"It is a stable solution."

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

"They're very competitive in terms of performance, which is a good selling point. It has very rich features. It provides a very rich feature set in the application."

"I think Talend is one of the easiest tools for faster implementation compared to other tools."

"The most valuable feature is integration."

"The process of upgrading the software is quite easy."

"Overall, the management and running environment are very stable, and I would rate it an eight out of ten."

"I like everything about this product, but the biggest thing is the ease of use."

"The solution is very user-friendly and easy to understand."

"I like the way that you can use the context variables, and how you can work those context variables to give you values and settings for every development environment, such as PROD, TEST, and DEV."

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"The pricing can be improved."

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"I've had some issues with bugs causing crashes, especially when making changes to the system or with the monthly upgrades to Studio they've introduced."

"We'd like to see more connectors it the future."

"Including either XML or JSON in the next release would definitely be a good transformation. I'm not sure if Talend has that feature, but it's one of those requirements that we are working around and have to do some parsing of XML so this could make it easier."

"The product must enhance the data quality."

"I wonder if, at the same price, the API component could be added, which would be beneficial."

"Once you get past the basic tools, it gets pretty complicated."

"Performance and speed could be improved."

"I would like to sync a project and do an upload from that current version, and then from GitLab, be able to download the latest one."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"The licensing cost is about 40,000 Euros a year."

"The price is on a per-user basis. It's a little more expensive than other tools. There aren't any additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"The price of the Talend Data Management Platform is reasonable. The other competing solutions are priced high. Gartner Magic Quadrant identified other solutions, such as Informatica, that are far more expensive."

"The pricing is a little higher than what I had expected, but it's comparable with I-PASS competitors."

"The tool is cheap."

"The solution's pricing is very reasonable and half the cost of Informatica."

"License renewal is on a yearly basis."