IBM Db2 Database vs MySQL comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. IBM holds a 7.0% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 8.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IBM Db2 Database

Read 73 IBM Db2 Database reviews

7,396 Views
4,674 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

MySQL

Read 148 MySQL reviews

7,825 Views
6,096 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

IBM Db2 Database

MySQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

IBM Db2 Database and MySQL compete in the database management systems category. Based on feature richness and performance optimization, IBM Db2 has the upper hand in environments demanding advanced capabilities and integration.

Features: IBM Db2 Database offers a powerful structured query language dialect with object tables, Java method support, and user-defined functions. It supports multiple platforms and includes self-tuning memory management for optimized performance without human intervention. MySQL is notable for its open-source status and ease of use, performing efficiently in small to medium applications with functionalities like multi-threaded architecture, triggers, and crash recovery techniques.

Room for Improvement: IBM Db2 Database is reportedly complex with difficulties in learning and licensing challenges. Users find its integration with web technologies lacking. MySQL suffers from slower performance with InnoDB, lacks advanced management tools, and has limited support for complex operations like stored procedures and active directory integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Db2 Database primarily thrives in on-premises environments with varied support levels, though users report reliable but occasionally slow and expensive customer service. MySQL offers on-premises and hybrid deployments with strong community support contributing to its ease of use, yet lacks the formal support seen with proprietary solutions.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Db2 Database is perceived as expensive compared to alternatives like MySQL, however, it offers long-term financial benefits due to robust performance and reliability. MySQL, being open-source, incurs minimal initial cost, offering savings on licensing fees but may incur extra expenses for enterprise support. Both databases provide substantial ROI, with MySQL favored for budget-conscious deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Db2 Database vs. MySQL Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Db2 Database vs. MySQL

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,319 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Db2 Database

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

148

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Db2 Database is 7.0%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MySQL is 8.5%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

SimonHiggins

Mainframe Technical Manager/Service Integration Lead at Saudi Business Machines

Very scalable with high availability and excellent technical support

The good thing is that there are improvements coming with later function levels for the z/OS Db2. I'd like it if, with the operating system that we've got, z/OS, on the mainframe, it would allow us to refresh the hardware to run Linux dockers on the mainframe. This means this might give us opportunities for different ways of coming into the Db2 environment in the future. We just want a bit more integration with Linux. That said, we are already seeing Linux more readily available on the mainframe environment. Not only have we got the premium operating systems on OS. We can run LPARs on the same mainframe footprint that is also supporting Linux. This is what has improved and made the mainframe environment more competitive. We're also looking at AI for Db2 as well, and machine learning for the future. We know that AI has come out, that we're going to get that, and we're going to evaluate that product next year for Db2. That said, I haven't got any real complaints about Db2 on the mainframe. For the most part, a lot of the problems we have nowadays are to do with communication between the various teams that you would class as stakeholders.

Read full review

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

Native encryption ensures secure data management with a simple deployment

The most valuable feature is the on-premises data encryption facilities. By default, we can provide encryption, and this feature in MySQL is why we prefer it over other databases. The native encryption in MySQL encourages us to use this database model more frequently compared to Oracle and other databases. With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment. It perfectly supports our ROI, and we have no issues with its functionality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are dealing with millions of transactions a month and the performance is very good."

"Some of the most valuable features are the scaling from a small very cheap installation to a very large enterprise installation. In addition, the backups and assistance are good."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Db2 Database is its ability to perform automatic self-management, reducing the need for manual tasks such as managing logs and folders."

"As part of your licensing with IBM, you get access to their case system, which lets you raise incidents related to software or hardware. This system is helpful for problem determination and quickly identifying issues."

"It's the best solution in terms of security, performance, and availability because the system is available 24/7."

"It's very secure."

"I believe that because the support is good, they jump in and assist us in determining the root cause."

"The solution is very stable, in both hardware and database."

More IBM Db2 Database pros

"The solution is easy to use."

"The way that MySQL has improved my organization is that it comes free and also works fine on the technical side."

"I find MySQL's relational data storage format very useful for data management. Our structure is well-defined and easy for end users and business stakeholders to read. I appreciate the tool's simplicity and ability to integrate with our backend tools."

"The installation process for the most scalable solution is remarkably quick, taking only a short amount of time."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The replication feature is the most valuable. We are replicating our servers."

"MySQL is a scalable tool. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The solution's technical support is good. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."

"It's a mature solution that's been around for decades."

More MySQL pros

Cons

"The product’s user interface is not easy to use."

"GUI needs improvement."

"The capabilities of this solution could improve."

"It would be helpful to have more querying tools and more development tools for us to work easily with Microsoft."

"It would be helpful to have a hybrid data storage facility that includes NoSQL technologies."

"The application development requires a Java developer and not every company has these resources."

"Db2 interface could be improved a bit. Comparing it to Oracle, Db2's interfaces could be improved."

"IBM's support isn't as strong as it used to be, especially when it comes to providing fixes."

More IBM Db2 Database cons

"If the customer is already using or has already used Oracle for a long time they will know the look and feel and the character of this database that can fit into their business."

"The solution could improve the monitoring. At the present time, you need to use third-party monitoring solutions."

"Improvements to MySQL depend on the specific use case. For example, in my scenario, I frequently need to maintain and store data, which can then be utilized to generate reports. On the other hand, others may suggest incorporating a feature that allows for easier visualization of the data, such as what is available in Power BI or other similar tools."

"It requires a training platform."

"I would like to improve the solution’s pricing for licenses."

"The user interface could be more user friendly. Mainly because most of the times we see black and white digital lines. Something like Python."

"Scalability could be improved."

"The auto-tuning and NDB cluster has some limitations regarding foreign keys."

More MySQL cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We purchase the product's yearly license."

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis."

"Db2 is less expensive than Oracle."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It's not super expensive, but also not cheap."

"Compared to other databases, Db2 is relatively cheaper."

"Clients are required to purchase a license."

"It's very expensive for West African countries like ours."

"Compared to Oracle, it is so much cheaper."

More IBM Db2 Database pricing and cost advice

"There is no cost involved, no licensing fees."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing a six out of ten. The solution is not cheap but it’s a fair value. The pricing depends on the use cases of our customers. Some of our customers use the community edition which is license free and a good fit for their use cases. However, we encourage our bigger customers to sign up because of the scalability issues. The paid versions get direct technical support from Oracle."

"I rate the solution's pricing as four out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. For our basic needs, it's quite affordable. However, the cost increases when we need to scale up or require high availability. Our developer team of about 600 people uses MySQL without much issue. The pricing becomes more of a concern on the business side, as we have more end users and need constant database availability and scaling. In those cases, the solution gets a bit more expensive, even though it provides good value for the business."

"This product has a good price point."

"I use a free version at present."

"It is open-source."

"The pricing is not much expensive, it's cheap."

"Microsoft licensing for SQL Server is probably ten times more expensive. I used to work for the government, and I remember when we were looking into upgrading to the enterprise version of SQL Server 2019, the licensing was going to cost 350,000. To get the equivalent in the cloud, it was going to be about four grand to get the same processing power and everything else. With MySQL, it was going to be about 300 for the same licensing. Cost-wise, for sure, there is a huge difference. Would you prefer to pay 300 a month or 3,000 to have the same amount of data resources? You might lose a few options that you need, but it isn't worth the price difference."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

62%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Db2 Database?

Db2 database scalability and performance capabilities match our database needs. It covers pretty much everything a database administrator or engineer might need.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Db2 Database?

IBM Db2 is an expensive solution. While I am not heavily involved with pricing, additional companies provide capabilities or products like those from BMC, which many installations might also purchase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Db2 Database?

The user interface is old and needs to be improved. It doesn't match the responsive and suggestion-rich UI of cloud solutions. New functions don't come to mind.

See all answers

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

Comparisons

SQL Server vs IBM Db2 Database

Compared 33% of the time

Oracle Database vs IBM Db2 Database

Compared 19% of the time

SAP HANA vs IBM Db2 Database

Compared 17% of the time

Teradata vs IBM Db2 Database

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Informix vs IBM Db2 Database

Compared 2% of the time

More IBM Db2 Database Competitors

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 28% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 16% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 9% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

SQLite vs MySQL

Compared 2% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Db2 Database

February 2025

Download IBM Db2 Database product report

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

February 2025

Download MySQL product report

Also Known As

DB2

No data available

Overview

DB2 Enterprise for Linux, UNIX, and Windows is the ideal data server for the most demanding workloads. New XML support is designed to help firms minimize the time and effort it takes to persist and use their XML data reducing development costs and improving business agility.

IBM

MySQL is a cost-efficient and scalable relational database management system widely used in web, mobile applications, and academic projects.

MySQL is utilized for backend operations, data analysis, reporting, financial transactions, and ERP databases. It supports deployment on local servers, Cloud, and Kubernetes. Its free, open-source nature along with strong community support make it popular among companies. MySQL's compatibility with multiple platforms and programming languages enhances its appeal. While it remains stable and easy to use, areas such as replication, clustering, and backup require improvement to better serve enterprise applications. Enhanced security, error messages, and monitoring tools are also desired for a better user experience.

What are the most important features of MySQL?

Free and Open-Source: No licensing costs, perfect for budget-conscious projects.
Compatibility: Works with multiple platforms and programming languages.
High Performance: Efficient performance across large datasets.
Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business needs.
Clustering and Replication: Ensures data availability and redundancy.
Easy Installation: Quick setup process on various operating systems.
Community Support: Extensive resources and community assistance.
Cross-Platform: Operates seamlessly on different operating systems.
Data Management Interface: Simplifies data handling and manipulation.

What are the benefits of using MySQL?

Cost Efficiency: Reduce expenses with a free, open-source database.
Scalability: Adapt to increasing data demands effortlessly.
Performance: Handle large datasets with ease and speed.
Community Support: Access a vast pool of knowledge and resources.
Flexibility: Integrate with various platforms and languages for diverse use cases.
Data Reliability: Clustering and replication for high data availability.

In multiple industries, MySQL supports internal applications, billing systems, academic teaching purposes, and ERP databases. Companies leverage MySQL for Cloud and local deployments, ensuring effective data manipulation and backend operations in diverse projects. Its role in financial transactions and reporting further emphasizes its versatility.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Knorr-Bremse, Mizuho Bank Ltd., Australian Government Department of Defence, SCHWENK Zement, Friedhelm Loh Group, YAZAKI Europe Limited, Ekornes ASA, Baldor Electric, VSN Systemen BV, Lion Brewery (Ceylon) PLC, PLANSEE Group, TE Connectivity, Hansgrohe SE, Openmatics, University of Toronto

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

Buyer's Guide

IBM Db2 Database vs. MySQL

March 2025

Free Report: IBM Db2 Database vs. MySQL

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Db2 Database vs. MySQL and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Db2 Database vs. MySQL report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.