IBM DevOps Test UI vs Inflectra Rapise comparison

IBM and Inflectra are both solutions in the Regression Testing Tools category. Additionally, 88% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Inflectra users who would recommend it.

IBM DevOps Test UI

Read 8 IBM DevOps Test UI reviews

484 Views
268 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

163 Views
79 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

IBM DevOps Test UI

Inflectra Rapise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM DevOps Test UI and Inflectra Rapise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Inflectra Rapise Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Inflectra Rapise

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM DevOps Test UI

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (29th), Regression Testing Tools (14th)

Inflectra Rapise

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (30th), Test Automation Tools (23rd)

Featured Reviews

Hellen Zhang

Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada

Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support

The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to how it works with the browser and the startup takes some time. Adjusting those changes to speed up the load time will improve the solution.

Read full review

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."

"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."

"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."

"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

Cons

"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."

"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."

"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."

"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

28%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

32%

Government

18%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?

I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?

See all answers

Comparisons

Selenium HQ vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 39% of the time

HCL OneTest vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 23% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 17% of the time

More IBM DevOps Test UI Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2025

Download IBM DevOps Test UI product report

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

April 2025

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Also Known As

IBM Rational Functional Tester

Rapise

Overview

IBM DevOps Test UI, also known as Rational Functional Tester, is a software tool designed for automated functional and regression testing of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) and data-driven testing. It automates the testing process to ensure application functionalities work as intended and identifies any issues caused by new code changes. The tool is tailored for GUI testing, allowing for easy recording and playback of test cases that interact with UI elements like buttons and menus. It supports data-driven testing, enabling comprehensive tests across various data sets. Additionally, it offers visual editing features with screenshot representations for easy test creation and ScriptAssure technology to maintain test scripts even if the UI changes.

IBM

Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?

Inflectra

Sample Customers

Edumate

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Inflectra Rapise

March 2025

Free Report: IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Inflectra Rapise

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Inflectra Rapise and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Inflectra Rapise report.

See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.