Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM eDiscovery Manager vs Nuix eDiscovery comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM eDiscovery Manager
Ranking in eDiscovery
24th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nuix eDiscovery
Ranking in eDiscovery
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of IBM eDiscovery Manager is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nuix eDiscovery is 5.9%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eDiscovery
 

Featured Reviews

IC
Feb 17, 2021
Stable with administrative aspects and an easy to navigate backend
The initial setup isn't exactly straightforward. It's a little complex. A company really should hire some experts that can navigate the implementation. Including testing, the deployment took about three hours. It's not a long or drawn-out process. Technically, you only need one person to handle the setup, however, it's advisable to at least have two people who are knowledgeable. In our case, we implemented it first in a separate environment and, once we saw everything was working as it should, then we sent it to production. There isn't much maintenance required. There's another application that handles that, however, we do have to monitor logs and the server where we put the searches.
AM
Jan 27, 2023
Straightforward installation, good support, and suitable for large pipelines
Nuix eDiscovery is for processing data before we load it on the review data platform In my industry, it is important to use this solution because it can handle a large pipeline. My past experience with the Nuix eDiscovery platform showed it was clunky when reviewing individual files and viewing…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Creating and running queries on the solution is very good."
"In my industry, it is important to use this solution because it can handle a large pipeline."
 

Cons

"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"My past experience with the Nuix eDiscovery platform showed it was clunky when reviewing individual files and viewing folder structures. I wondered why we had to process in Nuix eDiscovery and then transfer to another review platform, this was a waste of time. I wish Nuix eDiscovery would have a comprehensive review platform in-house. I heard they have improved in this area, but our firm hasn't invested in it. Integrating the processing and review would make for a fantastic solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price of Nuix eDiscovery is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Government
16%
Legal Firm
16%
Retailer
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Nuix eDiscovery?
In my industry, it is important to use this solution because it can handle a large pipeline.
What needs improvement with Nuix eDiscovery?
My past experience with the Nuix eDiscovery platform showed it was clunky when reviewing individual files and viewing folder structures. I wondered why we had to process in Nuix eDiscovery and then...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

eDiscovery Manager
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hansgrohe
CYFOR
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.