Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs Nuix eDiscovery comparison

Microsoft and Nuix are both solutions in the eDiscovery category. Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8, while Nuix is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 26.6% mindshare in eD, compared to Nuix’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nuix users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Read 8 Microsoft Purview eDiscovery reviews

1,239 Views
1,033 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Nuix eDiscovery

Read 1 Nuix eDiscovery review

704 Views
445 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Nuix eDiscovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Purview eDiscovery and Nuix eDiscovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Commvault and others in eDiscovery.

To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

eDiscovery

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Ranking in eDiscovery

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (21st)

Nuix eDiscovery

Ranking in eDiscovery

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is 26.6%, up from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nuix eDiscovery is 6.0%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

eDiscovery

Featured Reviews

Michael Bollhoefer

Deveoper Enterprise Content Mamagement Lead at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Enables automated legal holds, but sorting and filtering could be improved

The sorting and filtering of the result data need improvement, and the interface for writing queries is not user-friendly for business users. We still need all the backend stuff. We have to use Graph API to interface with everything and create custom interfaces on the front end to make it easier for the end users, which is costly. The reporting, sorting, and filtering capabilities that other products have aren't available natively in Purview.

Read full review

Akiko Miyake

Partner at Ernst & Young

Straightforward installation, good support, and suitable for large pipelines

My past experience with the Nuix eDiscovery platform showed it was clunky when reviewing individual files and viewing folder structures. I wondered why we had to process in Nuix eDiscovery and then transfer to another review platform, this was a waste of time. I wish Nuix eDiscovery would have a comprehensive review platform in-house. I heard they have improved in this area, but our firm hasn't invested in it. Integrating the processing and review would make for a fantastic solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is its ability to search across various platforms, including Exchange, SharePoint, Teams, and OneDrive. It enables a streamlined, unified process for searching across these platforms."

"Microsoft Purview eDiscovery has saved me personally a lot of time because I can query it, and it touches everything we have as a full Microsoft shop."

"The speed of it is valuable. I am able to search even 10,000 mailboxes for specific content. It helps search and accommodate the often limited information provided by users regarding what they need."

"The most valuable features are automatic content logging tagging. Performing these tasks manually would be impossible. Since most of our data is already in Microsoft, it's convenient to run it through this tool."

"Purview eDiscovery has made it significantly easier to handle rare litigation requests."

"The ability to query everything that's in Microsoft and send links or add people, like managers, to review the documents is valuable. It's easy as I don't have to download and email anything. I just add them as a reviewer, and they can access it from there."

"I think eDiscovery Premium has made dealing with data from Teams much more accessible than any other platform."

"The return on investment is saving the equivalent of one or two full-time IT department employees and a few hours per week for legal staff."

More Microsoft Purview eDiscovery pros

"In my industry, it is important to use this solution because it can handle a large pipeline."

Cons

"Microsoft Purview eDiscovery should be cheaper."

"The query language can be time-consuming to figure out if you don't know it initially. While there are options with dropdowns to select criteria, having a natural language feature would be beneficial. Copilot is expected to add such functionality in the future."

"The query language can be time-consuming to figure out if you don't know it initially."

"We find that many critical functions are available only to E5 license holders."

"I see two significant challenges with many of my clients. One is that there are some functionality gaps compared to specialized tools in the legal industry, like a legal hold tool or a document review tool. They have features that Purview eDiscovery lacks. Those gaps create a situation where I almost have to do things twice. I need to collect all my data in eDiscovery and ship it to another platform to complete the review."

"I would suggest adding more platforms."

"The sorting and filtering of the result data need improvement, and the interface for writing queries is not user-friendly for business users. We still need all the backend stuff. We have to use Graph API to interface with everything and create custom interfaces on the front end to make it easier for the end users, which is costly. The reporting, sorting, and filtering capabilities that other products have aren't available natively in Purview."

"It has been one of the most solid tools I have worked with. However, Purview Data Loss Protection for remediating policy violations needs refinement, for example, in defining what constitutes a credit card because that is where I get the most false positives."

More Microsoft Purview eDiscovery cons

"My past experience with the Nuix eDiscovery platform showed it was clunky when reviewing individual files and viewing folder structures. I wondered why we had to process in Nuix eDiscovery and then transfer to another review platform, this was a waste of time. I wish Nuix eDiscovery would have a comprehensive review platform in-house. I heard they have improved in this area, but our firm hasn't invested in it. Integrating the processing and review would make for a fantastic solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In the positions that I've had through contracting over the years, I've heard talk of it being overpriced and underperforming compared to its competitors."

"Microsoft Purview eDiscovery comes as part of Microsoft 365 licenses."

"With the full bundle, pricing is not a significant concern. As an M3, I find the Purview pricing of 1250 per user worthwhile."

"The pricing and licensing with Microsoft can be complex, and licensing is known to be a challenge because it changes frequently. While the licensing for Purview is not as tricky as other Microsoft products, navigating licenses since the shift to E3 and E5 plans has been a task, as individual licenses must now be purchased separately."

"The costs associated with E5 licensing are currently expensive for us, so we use the E3 license, which comes with fewer features and functionalities."

"The price of Nuix eDiscovery is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Government

18%

Legal Firm

17%

Retailer

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?

The tool has been beneficial. Some of our previous users left the organization without sharing the information they had at a personal level. This information was related to the organization, and th...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?

We go through CDW for all of our acquisitions, and they are very easy to work with. With CSP or MCE-style agreements with Microsoft, the process is streamlined since we have reps from both Microsof...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?

I would suggest adding more platforms. Currently, it's compatible with OneDrive, Teams, SharePoint, and Exchange. Adding more features, as Microsoft continues to expand their cloud offerings, would...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nuix eDiscovery?

In my industry, it is important to use this solution because it can handle a large pipeline.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nuix eDiscovery?

The price of Nuix eDiscovery is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nuix eDiscovery?

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Vault vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 53% of the time

Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 6% of the time

Exterro vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 5% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Purview eDiscovery Competitors

LAW PreDiscovery vs Nuix eDiscovery

Compared 19% of the time

IPRO vs Nuix eDiscovery

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery vs Nuix eDiscovery

Compared 15% of the time

Brainspace Discovery vs Nuix eDiscovery

Compared 13% of the time

kCura Relativity vs Nuix eDiscovery

Compared 10% of the time

More Nuix eDiscovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery

December 2024

Download Microsoft Purview eDiscovery product report

Buyer's Guide

eDiscovery

December 2024

Download Nuix eDiscovery product report

Learn More

Microsoft

Nuix

Overview

Efficiently respond to legal matters or internal investigations with intelligent capabilities that reduce data to only what’s relevant. Discover data where it lives. Discover and collect data in place, within your Microsoft Purview boundary. Manage workflows efficiently. Streamline your eDiscovery process with an end-to-end workflow from one platform. Accelerate your process. Get insights quickly with built-in capabilities, reducing review time and costs.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Nuix's suite of powerful, integrated eDiscovery solutions provides a proven reliability across the entire legal discovery process. Nuix technology rapidly gives user a single, unified view into the widest variety of data sources so you can make informed decisions.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

CYFOR

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Commvault and others in eDiscovery. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.